![]() |
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1
.
SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
INVESTORS SECURITIES ACT CSI ALLEGES CEASE-AND-DESIST PROCEEDINGS BOND OFFERING GOLD RESERVES INSTITUTING INTERNET PURSUANT CALIFORNIA EXCESS RECKLESS KNOWING ACCORDING CHILE REASONABLE BASIS ASSIGNING EXTRACTION DISCLOSE FEES REVENUE YIELD RICH TRADING RICH TRADING PROGRAM FUNDS PAY INVESTORS PUBLIC HEARING ALLEGATIONS ENTERED PURSUANT |
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
Securities Act of 1933
Release No. 7676 / May 11, 1999
Administrative Proceedings
File No. 3-9892
CEASE-AND-DESIST PROCEEDINGS INSTITUTED AGAINST GARY J. PIERCE AND
C.S.I. AG. FOR FRAUDULENT INTERNET OFFERING
The Commission has issued an order instituting public cease-and-desist
proceedings pursuant to Section 8A of the Securities Act of 1933
against Gary J. Pierce, of Studio City, California, and C.S.I. Ag., a
Turks & Caicos company.
In the order, the Division of Enforcement ("Division") alleges that
from July 1997 to February 1999, Pierce and CSI solicited investments
in a $500 million unregistered bond offering for the Government of
Free Vietnam, a political association in Garden Grove, California, via
its Internet website and its newspaper. The Division further alleges
that the promotional materials promised potential investors who made
an initial $10,000 minimum investment a 5.5% annual return, plus
double their original investment at the end of five years, resulting
in an overall average annual return of at least 19.6%. According to
the Division, Pierce and CSI represented that the bond offering was
collateralized by $500 million of CSI's gold reserves in Chile, the
total value of which was in excess of $20 billion, when, in fact, they
had no reasonable basis for assigning any value to any such gold
reserves, and they knew or were reckless in not knowing that the
extraction of any existing gold would take years and millions of
dollars. The Division further alleges that Pierce and CSI knowingly or
recklessly failed to disclose the fact that 70% of the money invested
would be used for fees and other activities that would generate no
revenue, and that only 30% would be invested in an unspecified "yield
rich trading program," which would have to generate an average annual
rate of return on those funds in excess of 56% for five years to pay
investors the rates of return promised. The Division alleges that
Pierce and CSI violated Sections 5(c), 17(a)(1) and 17(a)(3) of the
Securities Act.
A public hearing will be scheduled to determine whether the
allegations against CSI and Pierce are true and, if so, whether a
cease-and-desist order should be entered pursuant to Section 8A of the
Securities Act.
_________________________________________________________________
Modified 05/11/1999
SNIPPETS:
|
| | | |