LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v THE DREYFUS CORPORATION and MICHAEL L. SCHONBERG RELEASE NOS. 33-7857, IA-1870, IC-24450 Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: 33-7857, Defendant: The Dreyfus Corporation and Michael L. Schonberg Release Nos. 33-7857, IA-1870, ic-24450, Plaintiff: SEC, State: OR Oregon, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>33-7857, Dreyfus, Schonberg, Securities, Investment Company Act, Advisers Act, Ipos, Exchange Commission, Funds, Administrative Proceedings, Respondents, Pursuant, Dag, Net Asset, Ipo Shares, Growth, United States, Making Findings, Desist Pursuant, Allocation, Transactions, Consultant, Portfolio Manager, Dreyfus Corporation, Order Instituting Proceedings, Remedial Sanctions, First Trading, Average Daily Net, Growth Received Shares, Prospective Shareholders, Ordering Respondents , ContentID: 120244632

Case Documents
1 2000-05-10 SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 111366
13 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 13 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
SCHONBERG
SECURITIES
INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT
ADVISERS ACT
IPOS
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
FUNDS
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS
RESPONDENTS
PURSUANT
DAG
NET ASSET
IPO SHARES
GROWTH
UNITED STATES
MAKING FINDINGS
DESIST PURSUANT
ALLOCATION
TRANSACTIONS
CONSULTANT
PORTFOLIO MANAGER
DREYFUS CORPORATION
ORDER INSTITUTING PROCEEDINGS
REMEDIAL SANCTIONS
FIRST TRADING
AVERAGE DAILY NET
GROWTH RECEIVED SHARES
PROSPECTIVE SHAREHOLDERS
ORDERING RESPONDENTS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
before the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

   INVESTMENT ADVISERS ACT OF 1940
   RELEASE NO. 1870 / May 10, 2000

   INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 1940
   RELEASE NO. 24450 / May 10, 2000

   SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
   RELEASE NO. 7857 / May 10, 2000

   ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
   FILE NO. 3-10201
   In the Matter of

   The Dreyfus Corporation
   and Michael L. Schonberg,
   Respondents.
   ORDER INSTITUTING PROCEEDINGS,
   MAKING FINDINGS, IMPOSING
   REMEDIAL SANCTIONS AND
   ORDERING RESPONDENTS TO CEASE
   AND DESIST PURSUANT TO SECTIONS
   203(e), 203(f), AND 203(k) OF THE
   INVESTMENT ADVISERS ACT OF 1940,
   SECTIONS 9(b) AND 9(f) OF THE
   INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 1940,
   AND SECTION 8A OF THE SECURITIES
   ACT OF 1933

   I.

   The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") deems it
   appropriate and in the public interest that public administrative
   proceedings be instituted against The Dreyfus Corporation ("Dreyfus")
   and Michael L. Schonberg (collectively "Respondents") pursuant to
   Sections 203(e), 203(f), and 203(k) of the Investment Advisers Act of
   1940 ("Advisers Act"), Sections 9(b) and 9(f) of the Investment
   Company Act of 1940 ("Investment Company Act"), and Section 8A of the
   Securities Act of 1933 ("Securities Act").

   In anticipation of the institution of these administrative
   proceedings, Respondents have submitted Offers of Settlement
   ("Offers") which the Commission has determined to accept. Solely for
   the purpose of these proceedings and any other proceedings brought by
   or on behalf of the Commission, or to which the Commission is a party,
SNIPPETS:
  • SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
  • INVESTMENT ADVISERS ACT OF 1940
  • The Dreyfus Corporation and Michael L. Schonberg,
  • ORDER INSTITUTING PROCEEDINGS, MAKING FINDINGS, IMPOSING REMEDIAL SANCTIONS AND ORDERING
  • INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 1940, AND SECTION 8A OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
  • The Securities and Exchange Commission deems it appropriate and in the public interest that
  • In anticipation of the institution of these administrative proceedings, Respondents have
  • Dreyfus serves as investment adviser for the Dreyfus Aggressive Growth Fund and other
  • He served as portfolio manager for five of the Dreyfus Funds, including DAG, at intervals
  • Dreyfus Growth and Value Funds, Inc. is an open end, management investment company within the
  • Over the course of DAG's first fiscal year, Schonberg's allocations of securities purchased
  • Dreyfus did not take appropriate steps and did not institute adequate procedures reasonably
  • In July 1995, Schonberg was appointed portfolio manager of two preexisting funds the Dreyfus
  • Although the net asset sizes of these four funds differed significantly from each other
  • Therefore, IPOs in general, and hot IPOs in particular, represent valuable investment
  • Schonberg's IPO allocations over the course of DAG's first fiscal year had the effect of
  • Of the 109 IPOs, DAG was allocated shares in 89 percent, Strategic Growth received shares in
  • In an average month the three Funds other than DAG, taken together, received IPO shares whose
  • neither Dreyfus nor Schonberg disclosed to the Funds' boards of directors or to the Funds'
  • Pursuant to Section 203of the Advisers Act, Dreyfus shall, within ten days of the entry of
  • arrange for the Consultant to make conclusions and recommendations within 90 days from the
  •    |