LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v ERIC P. FURMAN, CPA Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: 34-42901, Defendant: Eric P. Furman, CPA, Plaintiff: SEC, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>34-42901, Furman, Commission, Micro, Securities, Exchange, Practice, Act, Accountant, Micro Warehouse, Financial Statements, Instituting, Pursuant, Judgement, Connection, Complaint, Materially False, Violating, Misleading, Enjoins, Thereunder, Alleges, Scheme, Form S-3, Administrative Proceedings, Settlement, Admitting, Findings, Jurisdiction, Officer, Marketer , ContentID: 120244614

Case Documents
1 2000-06-06 SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 111348
3 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 3 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
COMMISSION
MICRO
SECURITIES
EXCHANGE
PRACTICE
ACT
ACCOUNTANT
MICRO WAREHOUSE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INSTITUTING
PURSUANT
JUDGEMENT
CONNECTION
COMPLAINT
MATERIALLY FALSE
VIOLATING
MISLEADING
ENJOINS
THEREUNDER
ALLEGES
SCHEME
FORM S-3
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS
SETTLEMENT
ADMITTING
FINDINGS
JURISDICTION
OFFICER
MARKETER
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Before the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

   SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
   Release No. 42901 / June 6, 2000

   ACCOUNTING AND AUDITING ENFORCEMENT
   Release No. 1267 / June 6, 2000

   ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
   File No. 3-10217
     _________________________________________________________________

   In the Matter of

   ERIC P. FURMAN, CPA

     Respondent.
     _________________________________________________________________

     ORDER INSTITUTING PUBLIC
   PROCEEDINGS AND OPINION
   AND ORDER PURSUANT TO RULE
   102(e) OF THE COMMISSION'S
   RULES OF PRACTICE

   I.

   The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") deems it
   appropriate that public administrative proceedings be, and hereby are,
   instituted against Eric P. Furman ("Furman"), a certified public
   accountant, pursuant to Rule 102(e)(3) of the Commission's Rules of
   Practice.

   II.

   In anticipation of the institution of these public administrative
   proceedings, Furman has submitted an Offer of Settlement which the
   Commission has determined to accept. Solely for the purposes of these
   proceedings and any other proceedings brought by or on behalf of the
   Commission or to which the Commission is a party, and without
   admitting or denying the findings, except that he admits to the
   Commission's finding that a Final Judgment of Permanent Injunction
   ("Final Judgment") has been entered against him as set forth in
   Section III.C. below, and also admits the jurisdiction of the
   Commission over himself and over the subject matter of this
   proceeding, Furman consents to the entry of this Order Instituting
SNIPPETS:
  • SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
  • ERIC P. FURMAN, CPA
  • ORDER INSTITUTING PUBLIC PROCEEDINGS AND OPINION AND ORDER PURSUANT TO RULE
  • The Securities and Exchange Commission deems it appropriate that public administrative
  • In anticipation of the institution of these public administrative proceedings, Furman has
  • Solely for the purposes of these proceedings and any other proceedings brought by or on
  • below, and also admits the jurisdiction of the Commission over himself and over the subject
  • Furman, age 37, is and has been a certified public accountant licensed to practice in the
  • He was the Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of Micro Warehouse,
  • Furman has practiced before the Commission within the meaning of Rule 102of the Commission's
  • Micro Warehouse is a Delaware corporation that serves as a direct marketer of brand name
  • Micro Warehouse's principal executive offices are located in Norwalk, Connecticut, and its
  • On January 13, 2000, Furman consented to the entry of a Final Judgment against him in SEC v.
  • On May 31, 2000, the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut entered the
  • Furman carried out his scheme by causing numerous fictitious manual journal entries to be
  • The inflated profits were reported in financial statements that Micro Warehouse presented in,
  • The complaint also alleges that Furman knew, or was reckless in not knowing, that the
  • Paragraph of Rule 102provides, in relevant part, that ...The Commission, with due regard to
  •    |