LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v BRIAN T. LENIHAN Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: IA-1874, CourtCode: SU, CourtName: SUPERIOR COURT IN NORWALK, CONNECTICUT, AND ENTERED A PLEA OF GUILTY, Defendant: Brian T. Lenihan, Plaintiff: SEC, State: CT Connecticut, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>IA-1874, Lenihan, Investment, Commission, Investment Adviser, Advisers Act, Investment Clients, Proceeding, Findings, Convictions, Connecticut, Violation, Sanction, Cgs, Felonies, Securities, Exchange Commission, Administrative Proceeding, Matter, Brian, Pursuant, Larceny, Forgery, Engaging, Scheme, Defraud Investment Clients, Failing, Proper Disclosures, Regard, Advisory, Fee , ContentID: 120244613

Case Documents
1 2000-06-07 SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 111347
2 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 2 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
INVESTMENT
COMMISSION
INVESTMENT ADVISER
ADVISERS ACT
INVESTMENT CLIENTS
PROCEEDING
FINDINGS
CONVICTIONS
CONNECTICUT
VIOLATION
SANCTION
CGS
FELONIES
SECURITIES
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
MATTER
BRIAN
PURSUANT
LARCENY
FORGERY
ENGAGING
SCHEME
DEFRAUD INVESTMENT CLIENTS
FAILING
PROPER DISCLOSURES
REGARD
ADVISORY
FEE
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Before the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

   Investment Advisers Act of 1940 Release No. 1874 / June 7, 2000

   Administrative Proceeding File No. 3-10155

   In the Matter of

   Brian T. Lenihan,
   Respondent.

   ORDER MAKING FINDINGS
   AND IMPOSING A SANCTION

   I.

   In connection with a public administrative proceeding instituted
   against him on March 14, 2000, pursuant to Section 203(f) of the
   Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (the "Advisers Act"), Brian T. Lenihan
   ("Lenihan") has submitted an Offer of Settlement ("Offer") to the
   Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") which the Commission
   has determined to accept. Solely for the purposes of this proceeding
   and any other proceeding brought by or on behalf of the Commission or
   in which the Commission is a party, and without admitting or denying
   the findings contained herein, except that he admits the jurisdiction
   of the Commission over him and over the subject matter of these
   proceedings, and the findings contained in Section II, paragraphs 1,
   2, and 4 below, Lenihan consents to the entry of the findings and
   remedial sanction set forth below.

   II.

   On the basis of this Order and the Offer submitted by Lenihan, the
   Commission makes the following findings.

   1. Lenihan, an investment adviser, did business under the name
   "Lenihan Investments," a sole-proprietorship operated from his
   residence in Fairfield County, Connecticut. Lenihan registered with
   the Commission as an investment adviser under Section 203 of the
   Advisers Act on July 12, 1994. Lenihan maintained his status as a
   registered investment adviser until March 13, 1998, when his
   registration was withdrawn pursuant to the terms of a Form ADV-W filed
   with the Commission on January 12, 1998.

   2. On July 18, 1999, Lenihan appeared before the Stamford/Norwalk
   Superior Court in Norwalk, Connecticut, and entered a plea of guilty
SNIPPETS:
  • Investment Advisers Act of 1940 Release No. 1874 / June 7,
  • Administrative Proceeding File No. 3-10155
  • Brian T. Lenihan, Respondent.
  • ORDER MAKING FINDINGS AND IMPOSING A SANCTION
  • In connection with a public administrative proceeding instituted against him on March 14,
  • Solely for the purposes of this proceeding and any other proceeding brought by or on behalf
  • Lenihan, an investment adviser, did business under the name "Lenihan Investments," a
  • Lenihan maintained his status as a registered investment adviser until March 13, 1998, when
  • On July 18, 1999, Lenihan appeared before the Stamford/Norwalk Superior Court in Norwalk,
  • In pertinent part, the criminal information under which Lenihan was convicted in July 1999
  • By virtue of his convictions for larceny and forgery, Lenihan has been convicted of felonies
  • By virtue of his convictions for engaging in a scheme to defraud investment clients and
  •    |