LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v DONALD G. BROOKS RELEASE NOS. 34-42927, IA-1877 Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: 34-42927, Defendant: Donald G. Brooks Release Nos. 34-42927, IA-1877, Plaintiff: SEC, State: OR Oregon, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>34-42927, Brooks, Investors, Act, Commission, Fund, Bfp, Church, Securities, Exchange, Advisers Act, Texas, Complaint, Payments, Fictitious Church, Donald, Findings, Texas Corporation, Deems, Protection, Hereby, Consents, Sanctions, Broker-dealers, Financial Planning, Dallas, Clients, District, Violations, Thereunder , ContentID: 120244604

Case Documents
1 2000-06-13 SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 111338
3 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 3 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
INVESTORS
ACT
COMMISSION
FUND
BFP
CHURCH
SECURITIES
EXCHANGE
ADVISERS ACT
TEXAS
COMPLAINT
PAYMENTS
FICTITIOUS CHURCH
DONALD
FINDINGS
TEXAS CORPORATION
DEEMS
PROTECTION
HEREBY
CONSENTS
SANCTIONS
BROKER-DEALERS
FINANCIAL PLANNING
BUSINESS
DALLAS
CLIENTS
DISTRICT
VIOLATIONS
THEREUNDER
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Before the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

   SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
   Release No. 42927 / June 13, 2000

   INVESTMENT ADVISERS ACT OF 1940
   Release No. 1877 / June 13, 2000

   ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
   File No. 3-10224
   ____________________________
   In the Matter of             ORDER INSTITUTING PROCEEDINGS,
                                MAKING FINDINGS AND IMPOSING
   Donald G. Brooks,            REMEDIAL SANCTION
   Respondent.
   ____________________________

   I.

   The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") deems it
   appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors,
   that public administrative proceedings be, and hereby are, instituted
   pursuant to Sections 15(b) and 19(h) of the Securities Exchange Act of
   1934 ("Exchange Act"), and Section 203(f) of the Investment Advisers
   Act of 1940 ("Advisers Act") against Donald G. Brooks ("Brooks").

   In anticipation of the institution of these proceedings, Brooks has
   submitted an Offer of Settlement ("Offer") to the Commission, which
   the Commission has determined to accept.

   Solely for the purpose of these proceedings and any other proceedings
   brought by or on behalf of the Commission, or in which the Commission
   is a party, and without admitting or denying the findings contained
   herein, except those contained in paragraphs II.A., II.B and II.C.,
   and the jurisdiction of the Commission over him and the subject matter
   of these proceedings, Brooks consents to the issuance of this Order
   Instituting Proceedings, Making Findings and Imposing Remedial
   Sanctions, and to the entry of the findings set forth below.

   II.

   On the basis of this Order and the Offer submitted by Brooks, the
   Commission finds that

   A. Donald G. Brooks, age 64 and a resident of Garland, Texas, from May
   1990 through April 1999, was a registered representative with one or
SNIPPETS:
  • SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
  • SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
  • The Securities and Exchange Commission deems it appropriate in the public interest, for the
  • In anticipation of the institution of these proceedings, Brooks has submitted an Offer of
  • Solely for the purpose of these proceedings and any other proceedings brought by or on behalf
  • Sanctions, and to the entry of the findings set forth below.
  • Donald G. Brooks, age 64 and a resident of Garland, Texas, from May 1990 through April 1999,
  • Brooks Financial Planning, Inc., a Texas corporation with its principal place of business in
  • Brooks and BFP provided financial planning advice to their clients and took compensation from
  • On March 24, 2000, a Final Judgment was entered by consent against Brooks and BFP, in the
  • Brooks and BFP were permanently enjoined from violations of Sections 17of the Securities Act
  • The Commission's Amended Complaint against Brooks and BFP alleged that starting in 1989 and
  • E. The Complaint further alleged that although Brooks and BFP promised investors annual
  • F. The Complaint also alleged that Brooks and BFP encouraged prospective investors to
  • Brooks and BFP promised investors semi-annual or other periodic "interest" payments.
  • In view of the foregoing, the Commission deems it appropriate in the public interest, for the
  • Brooks be, and hereby is, barred from association with any broker, dealer or investment
  •    |