LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING v PENSLEY Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: 34-40890, Defendant: PENSLEY, Plaintiff: ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>34-40890, Pensley, Commission, Act, Securities, Practice, Exchange Act, Visual Cybernetics, Pursuant, Violating, United States, Joel Pensley, Findings, Settlement, Instituting, Complaint, Nominees, District, Provision, Compass Rose, Permanently Enjoining, Administrative Proceedings, Imposing, Remedial Sanctions Pursuant, Admitting, Entry, Injunction, Stock, Registration Statement , ContentID: 120244582

Case Documents
1 1999-01-07 SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 111316
4 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 4 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
COMMISSION
ACT
SECURITIES
PRACTICE
EXCHANGE ACT
VISUAL CYBERNETICS
PURSUANT
VIOLATING
UNITED STATES
JOEL PENSLEY
FINDINGS
SETTLEMENT
INSTITUTING
COMPLAINT
NOMINEES
DISTRICT
PROVISION
COMPASS ROSE
PERMANENTLY ENJOINING
COURT
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS
IMPOSING
REMEDIAL SANCTIONS PURSUANT
ADMITTING
ENTRY
INJUNCTION
ATTORNEY
STOCK
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Before the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

   SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
   Release No. 40890 / January 7, 1999

   ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
   File No. 3-9800

   In the Matter of

   JOEL PENSLEY,
   Respondent.
   ORDER INSTITUTING PROCEEDINGS,
   MAKING FINDINGS, AND IMPOSING
   REMEDIAL SANCTIONS PURSUANT TO
   RULE 102(e) OF THE COMMISSIONS
   RULES OF PRACTICE

   I.

   The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") deems it
   appropriate and in the public interest that public administrative
   proceedings be, and they hereby are, instituted against Joel Pensley
   ("Pensley") pursuant to Rule 102(e)(3) of the Commission's Rules of
   Practice.

   In anticipation of the institution of these administrative
   proceedings, Pensley has submitted an Offer of Settlement of Joel
   Pensley ("Offer of Settlement") that the Commission has determined to
   accept. Solely for the purpose of these proceedings and any other
   proceedings brought by or on behalf of the Commission or to which the
   Commission is a party, Pensley, without admitting or denying the
   findings, except as to the entry of the injunction set forth in
   paragraph II.B.4 and the Commission's jurisdiction over him and the
   subject matter of these proceedings, which are admitted, consents to
   the entry of this Order Instituting Proceedings, Making Findings, and
   Imposing Remedial Sanctions Pursuant to Rule 102(e) of the
   Commission's Rules of Practice ("Order").

   II.

   FINDINGS

   On the basis of this Order and the Offer of Settlement, the Commission
   finds the following

SNIPPETS:
  • SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
  • SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
  • ORDER INSTITUTING PROCEEDINGS, MAKING FINDINGS, AND IMPOSING REMEDIAL SANCTIONS PURSUANT TO
  • The Securities and Exchange Commission deems it appropriate and in the public interest that
  • In anticipation of the institution of these administrative proceedings, Pensley has submitted
  • Solely for the purpose of these proceedings and any other proceedings brought by or on behalf ursuant to Rule 102of the Commission's Rules of Practice.
  • Joel Pensley, 57, is a solo-practice attorney licensed to practice in the State of New York.
  • From 1992 through 1995, Pensley was outside counsel for Visual Cybernetics Corp., although
  • On September 9, 1998, the Commission filed a civil injunctive action against Pensley and
  • The Commission's Complaint alleged that, between 1992 and 1994, Pensley and others
  • In order to raise working capital, Visual Cybernetics sold shares registered on Forms S-8
  • The documents omitted any discussion of a material provision of a 1992 agreement for Visual
  • On November 14, 1998, without admitting or denying any of the allegations in the Commission's
  • On December 29, 1998, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
  • who has been by name Permanently enjoined by any court of competent jurisdiction, by reason
  •    |