LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING v PROCEEDINGS Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: 40945, Defendant: PROCEEDINGS, Plaintiff: ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING, State: OR Oregon, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>40945, Audit Clients, Professionals, Securities, Publicly-held, Independence, Commission, Manager, Pwc, Firm, Professional Services, Fund Manager, Tampa Tax, Public Accounting, Investments, Regulation S-x, Standards, Requiring, Engagement, Pension Department, Report, Pursuant, Gaas, Respondent, Respecting, Contravention, Retirement Plan, Staff, Commit, Purchases , ContentID: 120244541

Case Documents
1 1999-01-14 SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 111275
14 pages
TXT
Total Documents: 1 document , 14 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
PROFESSIONALS
SECURITIES
PUBLICLY-HELD
INDEPENDENCE
COMMISSION
MANAGER
PWC
FIRM
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PARTNERS
FUND MANAGER
TAMPA TAX
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING
INVESTMENTS
REGULATION S-X
STANDARDS
REQUIRING
ENGAGEMENT
PENSION DEPARTMENT
REPORT
PURSUANT
GAAS
RESPONDENT
RESPECTING
CONTRAVENTION
RETIREMENT PLAN
STAFF
COMMIT
PURCHASES
                              UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
                                     Before the
                         SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


          SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
          Release No.  40945  /  January 14, 1999

          ACCOUNTING AND AUDITING ENFORCEMENT
          Release No.  1098  /  January 14, 1999

          ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
          File No.  3-9809

                                          :
          In the Matter of                :  ORDER INSTITUTING
                                          :  PROCEEDINGS AND OPINION AND
          PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP,     :  ORDER PURSUANT TO RULE 102(e)
                                          :  OF THE COMMISSION’S RULES OF
                    Respondent.           :  PRACTICE
                                          :


                                         I.

               The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") deems
          it appropriate and in the public interest to institute public
          administrative proceedings pursuant to Rule 102(e) of the
          Commission’s Rules of Practice[1] against PricewaterhouseCoopers
          LLP ("PwC" or "Respondent").

                                         II.

               In anticipation of the institution of these administrative
          proceedings, PwC has submitted an Offer of Settlement which the
          Commission has determined to accept.  Solely for the purpose of
          these proceedings and any other proceedings brought by or on
          behalf of the Commission, or to which the Commission is a party,
          and without admitting or denying the facts, findings, or
          conclusions herein, except as to the Commission’s jurisdiction
          over it and the subject matter of these proceedings, which are
          admitted, PwC consents to the entry of this Order Instituting
          Proceedings and Opinion and Order Pursuant to Rule 102(e) of the
          Commission’s Rules of Practice ("Order").

               Accordingly, it is ordered that proceedings pursuant to Rule
          102(e) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice be, and hereby are,
          instituted.
SNIPPETS:
  • SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
  • The Securities and Exchange Commission deems it appropriate and in the public interest to
  • In anticipation of the institution of these administrative proceedings, PwC has submitted an
  • PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP is a public accounting firm
  • During the period 1996 through 1998, C&L’s procedures for ensuring its compliance with
  • * In 31 instances, individual partners owned securities
  • provided no professional services and individual
  • C&L’s retirement plan owned securities
  • Each of these instances was contrary to Rule 2-01of Regulation S-X and generally accepted
  • First, in December 1996, a senior tax associate of C&L’s Tampa office ("Tampa Tax Associate")
  • These investments occurred in three types of instances.
  • During the period 1997 through 1998, an independent fund manager that was not a C&L employee
  • C&L’s procedure for monitoring the fund manager’s compliance with C&L’s prohibitions
  • In addition, the pension department did not ensure that the investments were sold, and did
  • responsibilities and located in [the engagement office]
  • On the basis of the foregoing, the Commission finds that Respondent failed to comply with
  • PwC undertakes that it will take measures which it determines will be designed to provide
  • not unacceptable to the Commission Staff,
  • contravention of the applicable rules and regulations
  • respecting professional independence ("Internal
  •    |