LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v CHARLES F. PARISI Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: IA-1885, Defendant: Charles F. Parisi, Plaintiff: SEC, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>IA-1885, Investment, Advisers, Parisi, Investment Company, Commission, Proceeding, Advisers Act, Instituting, Administrative Proceeding, Bar Order, Charles, Respondent, Administrative Proceeding Pursuant, Making Findings, Remedial Sanctions, Hereby, District, Participating, United States, Imposing Remedial Sanctions, Judgement, Permanent, California, Associating, Complaint, Alleges, Admits, Entry, Injunction, States District Court , ContentID: 120244301

Case Documents
1 2000-07-10 SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 111035
3 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 3 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
ADVISERS
PARISI
INVESTMENT COMPANY
COMMISSION
PROCEEDING
ADVISERS ACT
INSTITUTING
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
BAR ORDER
CHARLES
RESPONDENT
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING PURSUANT
MAKING FINDINGS
REMEDIAL SANCTIONS
HEREBY
DISTRICT
PARTICIPATING
UNITED STATES
IMPOSING REMEDIAL SANCTIONS
JUDGEMENT
PERMANENT
CALIFORNIA
ASSOCIATING
COMPLAINT
ALLEGES
ADMITS
ENTRY
INJUNCTION
STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Before the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

   INVESTMENT ADVISERS ACT OF 1940
   Release No. 1885 / July 10, 2000

   ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
   File No. 3-10249

   In the Matter of

   CHARLES F. PARISI,
   Respondent.

   ORDER INSTITUTING PUBLIC
   ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
   PURSUANT TO SECTION 203(f)
   OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISERS
   ACT OF 1940, MAKING FINDINGS
   AND IMPOSING REMEDIAL SANCTIONS

   I.

   The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") deems it
   appropriate in the public interest to institute a public
   administrative proceeding pursuant to Section 203(f) of the Investment
   Advisers Act of 1940 ("Advisers Act") against Charles F. Parisi
   ("Parisi").

   Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that said proceeding be, and hereby
   is, instituted.
   II.

   In anticipation of the institution of this proceeding, Parisi has
   submitted an Offer of Settlement ("Offer") which the Commission has
   determined to accept. Solely for the purpose of this proceeding and
   any other proceeding brought by or on behalf of the Commission or in
   which the Commission is a party, and without admitting or denying the
   findings contained in this Order, except that Respondent admits the
   jurisdiction of the Commission over him and over the subject matter of
   this proceeding and admits the entry of the judgment of permanent
   injunction set forth in paragraph III.C. Respondent consents to the
   entry of this Order Instituting Public Administrative Proceeding
   Pursuant To Section 203(f) Of The Investment Advisers Act Of 1940,
   Making Findings And Imposing Remedial Sanctions ("Order").
   III.

SNIPPETS:
  • ORDER INSTITUTING PUBLIC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
  • OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISERS ACT OF 1940, MAKING FINDINGS AND IMPOSING REMEDIAL SANCTIONS
  • The Securities and Exchange Commission deems it appropriate in the public interest to
  • Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that said proceeding be, and hereby is, instituted.
  • Solely for the purpose of this proceeding and any other proceeding brought by or on behalf of
  • Respondent consents to the entry of this Order Instituting Public Administrative Proceeding
  • the 1992 Bar Order barred Parisi from associating with any investment adviser or investment
  • On September 27, 1999, the Commission filed an action against Parisi in the United States
  • The Complaint filed in that action alleges, among other things, that from approximately
  • The Complaint alleges that Parisi associated with these entities by, among other things selecting portfolio managers for the Investment Company; participating in Investment Company board
  • On June 29, 2000, the United States District Court for the Southern District of California
  •    |