LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v SAMUEL G. LEDERMAN Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: 34-43106, Defendant: Samuel G. Lederman, Plaintiff: SEC, State: OR Oregon, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>34-43106, Lederman, Commission, Exchange Act, Securities, Lotus, Administrative Proceedings, Instituting, Pursuant, Hereby, Making Findings, Imposing Remedial Sanctions, Settlement, Tender, Ibm, Amount, Impose, United States, Matter, Samuel, Deems, Entry, Permanent, Consents, Broker-dealer, District, Civil, Violation, Thereunder, Transactions, Lotus Development Corporation , ContentID: 120244288

Case Documents
1 2000-08-02 SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 111022
3 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 3 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
COMMISSION
EXCHANGE ACT
SECURITIES
LOTUS
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS
INSTITUTING
PURSUANT
HEREBY
MAKING FINDINGS
IMPOSING REMEDIAL SANCTIONS
SETTLEMENT
TENDER
IBM
AMOUNT
IMPOSE
UNITED STATES
MATTER
SAMUEL
DEEMS
ENTRY
PERMANENT
CONSENTS
BROKER-DEALER
DISTRICT
CIVIL
VIOLATION
THEREUNDER
TRANSACTIONS
LOTUS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Before the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

   Securities Exchange Act of 1934
   Release No. 43106 \ August 2, 2000

   Administrative Proceeding
   File No. 3-10260
     _________________________________________________________________

   In the Matter of

   Samuel G. Lederman,

   Respondent.
     _________________________________________________________________

     ORDER INSTITUTING ADMINISTRATIVE
   PROCEEDINGS, MAKING FINDINGS AND
   IMPOSING REMEDIAL SANCTIONS
   PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 15(b) AND
   19(h) OF THE SECURITIES
   EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

   I.

   The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") deems it
   appropriate and in the public interest that administrative proceedings
   be instituted pursuant to Sections 15(b) and 19(h) of the Securities
   Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act") against Samuel G. Lederman
   ("Lederman").

   In anticipation of the institution of these administrative
   proceedings, Lederman has submitted an Offer of Settlement, which the
   Commission has determined to accept. Solely for purposes of these
   proceedings and any other proceedings brought by, or on behalf of, the
   Commission, or to which the Commission is a party, and without
   admitting or denying the findings herein, except as to the
   jurisdiction of the Commission over him and the subject matter of
   these proceedings and the entry of the permanent injunction as
   described in paragraph II.D. below, which he admits, Lederman consents
   to the entry of this Order Instituting Administrative Proceedings,
   Making Findings and Imposing Remedial Sanctions Pursuant to Sections
   15(b) and 19(h) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Order").

   Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that public administrative
   proceedings be, and hereby are, instituted against Lederman pursuant
SNIPPETS:
  • UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
  • SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
  • Securities Exchange Act of 1934
  • PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 15AND 19OF THE SECURITIES
  • The Securities and Exchange Commission deems it appropriate and in the public interest that
  • In anticipation of the institution of these administrative proceedings, Lederman has
  • Solely for purposes of these proceedings and any other proceedings brought by, or on behalf
  • below, which he admits, Lederman consents to the entry of this Order Instituting
  • Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that public administrative proceedings be, and hereby are,
  • Lederman, age 53 and a resident of Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, was, at all relevant
  • On May 26, 1999, the Commission filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the
  • Specifically, the Commission alleged that Lederman purchased 40 June $35 Lotus call options common stock, Lederman and the other individual realized an aggregate profit of $95,250, half of
  • June 12, 2000, a final judgment was entered against Lederman by consent which permanently
  • the Commission deems it appropriate and in the public interest to impose the sanctions
  •    |