LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v SCOTT ESKEW Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: 33-7887, Defendant: Scott Eskew, Plaintiff: SEC, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>33-7887, Securities, Eskew, Act, Research Report, Exchange Act, Commission, Pursuant, Material Facts, Violations, Instituting, Findings, Paragraphs, Eskew Committed Violations, Instruments, Interstate Commerce, Mails, Sale, Purchasers, State Material Facts, Scott Eskew, Respondent, Making Findings, Cease-and-desist Order, Employing, Independent Research Analyst, Research Analyst, Misleading, Admitting, Acquisitions , ContentID: 120244264

Case Documents
1 2000-09-06 SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 110998
3 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 3 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
ESKEW
ACT
RESEARCH REPORT
EXCHANGE ACT
COMMISSION
PURSUANT
MATERIAL FACTS
VIOLATIONS
INSTITUTING
FINDINGS
PARAGRAPHS
ESKEW COMMITTED VIOLATIONS
BUSINESS
INSTRUMENTS
INTERSTATE COMMERCE
MAILS
SALE
PURCHASERS
STATE MATERIAL FACTS
SCOTT ESKEW
RESPONDENT
MAKING FINDINGS
CEASE-AND-DESIST ORDER
EMPLOYING
INDEPENDENT RESEARCH ANALYST
RESEARCH ANALYST
MISLEADING
ADMITTING
ACQUISITIONS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Before the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

   SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 Release No. 7887 / September 6, 2000

   SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
   Release No. 43248 / September 6, 2000

   Administrative Proceeding
   File No. 3-10278

   In the Matter of

   SCOTT ESKEW,
   Respondent.
   ORDER INSTITUTING PUBLIC PROCEEDINGS
   PURSUANT TO SECTION 8A OF THE
   SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 AND SECTION 21C
   OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
   1934, MAKING FINDINGS, AND IMPOSING
   CEASE-AND-DESIST ORDER

   I.

   The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") deems it
   appropriate that public cease-and-desist proceedings be, and they
   hereby are, instituted pursuant to Section 8A of the Securities Act of
   1933 ("Securities Act") and Section 21C of the Securities Exchange Act
   of 1934 ("Exchange Act") against Scott Eskew ("Eskew").

   II.

   In anticipation of the institution of these administrative
   proceedings, Eskew has submitted an Offer of Settlement ("Offer"),
   which the Commission has determined to accept. Solely for the purpose
   of these proceedings and any other proceeding brought by or on behalf
   of the Commission or to which the Commission is a party, Eskew admits
   the jurisdiction of the Commission over him and the subject matter of
   these proceedings and consents to the issuance of this Order
   Instituting Public Proceedings Pursuant to Section 8A of the
   Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21C of the Securities Exchange Act
   of 1934, Making Findings, and Imposing Cease-and-Desist Order ("the
   Order"), without admitting or denying the Commission's findings,
   except for those contained in Paragraph III.A below, which are
   admitted.

   III.
SNIPPETS:
  • SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
  • SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 Release No. 7887 / September 6,
  • Respondent.
  • ORDER INSTITUTING PUBLIC PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO SECTION 8A OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 AND
  • The Securities and Exchange Commission deems it appropriate that public cease-and-desist
  • Solely for the purpose of these proceedings and any other proceeding brought by or on behalf ut admitting or denying the Commission's findings, except for those contained in Paragraph III.A
  • The research report claimed, among other things, that the subject company had significantly
  • When the research report was published on the Internet, the report was described as the
  • The research report, as published, was false and misleading.
  • The company that was the subject of the report had not significantly expanded by acquisitions
  • Although Eskew relied upon his several years of personal experience in the underlying
  • F. Eskew committed violations of Section 17of the Securities Act, directly and indirectly,
  • G. Eskew committed violations of Sections 17and 17of the Securities Act, directly and engaging in transactions, practices, and a course of business which operated as a fraud or deceit
  •    |