LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v JAMES A. SKALKO Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: 34-43317, Defendant: James A. Skalko, Plaintiff: SEC, State: IN Indiana, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>34-43317, Securities, Exchange Act, Respondent, Commission, Administrative Proceedings, Instituting, Findings, Participating, Penny Stocks, Respondent James, Skalko, Administrative Proceedings Pursuant, Imposing Remedial Sanctions, Admitting, Complaint, Corporate Relations Group, Offerings, United States, Matter, Making Findings, Deems, Protection, Investors, Hereby, Jurisdiction, Consents, District, Florida, Thereunder, Pay , ContentID: 120244244

Case Documents
1 2000-09-21 SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 110978
2 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 2 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
EXCHANGE ACT
RESPONDENT
COMMISSION
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS
INSTITUTING
FINDINGS
PARTICIPATING
PENNY STOCKS
RESPONDENT JAMES
SKALKO
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT
IMPOSING REMEDIAL SANCTIONS
ADMITTING
COMPLAINT
CORPORATE RELATIONS GROUP
OFFERINGS
UNITED STATES
MATTER
MAKING FINDINGS
DEEMS
PROTECTION
INVESTORS
HEREBY
JURISDICTION
CONSENTS
DISTRICT
FLORIDA
THEREUNDER
PAY
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Before the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

   SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
   Release No. 43317 / September 21, 2000

   ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
   File No. 3-10293
   In the Matter of

   JAMES A. SKALKO,

   Respondent.
   ORDER INSTITUTING PUBLIC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO
   SECTIONS 15(b)(6) AND 19(h) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,
   MAKING FINDINGS AND IMPOSING REMEDIAL SANCTIONS

   I.

   The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") deems it
   appropriate in the public interest and for the protection of investors
   that a public administrative proceeding be, and hereby is, instituted
   pursuant to Sections 15(b)(6) and 19(h) of the Securities Exchange Act
   of 1934 ("Exchange Act") against Respondent James A. Skalko.

   II.

   In anticipation of the institution of these administrative
   proceedings, Respondent has submitted an Offer of Settlement (the
   "Offer") which the Commission has determined to accept. Solely for the
   purpose of these proceedings and any other proceedings brought by or
   on behalf of the Commission or in which the Commission is a party, and
   without admitting or denying the findings, except as to jurisdiction
   over him and the subject matter of these proceedings and as to
   paragraph III.A. below, which Respondent admits, Respondent consents
   to the entry of this Order Instituting Public Administrative
   Proceedings Pursuant to Sections 15(b)(6) and 19(h) of the Securities
   Exchange Act of 1934, Making Findings and Imposing Remedial Sanctions
   (the "Order").

   III.

   On the basis of this Order and the Respondent's Offer, the Commission
   makes the following findings

   A. On August 11, 2000, by Respondent's consent, in which he neither
   admitted nor denied any of the allegations of the complaint, except as
SNIPPETS:
  • UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
  • SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
  • ORDER INSTITUTING PUBLIC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO
  • SECTIONS 15AND 19OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,
  • MAKING FINDINGS AND IMPOSING REMEDIAL SANCTIONS
  • The Securities and Exchange Commission deems it appropriate in the public interest and for
  • In anticipation of the institution of these administrative proceedings, Respondent has
  • Solely for the purpose of these proceedings and any other proceedings brought by or on behalf
  • below, which Respondent admits, Respondent consents to the entry of this Order Instituting
  • On August 11, 2000, by Respondent's consent, in which he neither admitted nor denied any of
  • Corporate Relations Group, Inc. et al., C.A.
  • No. 6 99-cv-1222-Orl-28A, entered a Final Judgment that permanently enjoined Respondent from
  • The Commission's complaint in the injunctive action alleged, among other things, that from at
  • The securities of several of the companies discussed in the complaint constituted penny
  • By engaging in the conduct described above, Respondent was a person who participated in
  • the Commission deems it appropriate in the public interest and for the protection of
  • Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, that Respondent James A. Skalko be, and hereby is, barred from
  •    |