 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1
.
SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
FRAUD MCEVOY ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS MCKINNEY GORDON TAYLOR PARKS BROWNSON UNITED STATES SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT COMMISSION INSTITUTING SHIRLEY DARLAN GORDON MICHAEL FRANCIS DOUGLAS PARKS JOHN CONSPIRACY COMMIT SECURITIES FRAUD MAIL FRAUD WIRE FRAUD FLA INDICTMENT CRIMINAL INFORMATION PROMOTER CLIENTS PROTECTION INVESTORS |
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Release No. 43322 / September 21, 2000
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
File No. 3-10295
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS INSTITUTED AGAINST SHIRLEY A. McKINNEY,
DARLAN GORDON, MICHAEL J. McEVOY, FRANCIS A. TAYLOR, IV, DOUGLAS PARKS
AND JOHN BROWNSON
On September 21, 2000, the Commission entered an Order Instituting
Administrative Proceedings Pursuant to Sections 15(b) and 19(h) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Order") against Shirley A. McKinney
("McKinney"), Darlan Gordon ("Gordon"), Michael J. McEvoy ("McEvoy"),
Francis A. Taylor, IV ("Taylor"), Douglas Parks ("Parks") and John S.
Brownson ("Brownson") based on their convictions for conspiracy to
commit securities fraud, mail fraud and wire fraud. United States v.
Paul Mabry, et al., Case No. 98-8117-CR-HURLEY (S.D. Fla. 1998) and
United States v. McEvoy, Case No. 98-8115 CR- HURLEY (S.D. Fla. 1998).
The Division of Enforcement alleged that McKinney, Gordon, McEvoy,
Taylor, Parks and Brownson each pled guilty to one count of an
indictment or criminal information charging them with conspiracy to
commit securities fraud, mail fraud and wire fraud. The indictment and
criminal information alleged that while employed as registered
representatives at various registered broker-dealers during various
periods between June 1993 and June 1995, McKinney, Gordon, McEvoy,
Taylor, Parks and Brownson accepted undisclosed compensation from a
promoter for inducing their clients to purchase securities of certain
issuers affiliated with the promoter. Each was sentenced to probation
and/or prison and ordered to pay restitution to the extent that their
clients suffered losses.
A hearing will be scheduled before an administrative law judge to
determine whether the allegations in the Order are true and, if so,
what remedial sanctions are appropriate for the protection of
investors and in the public interest.
_________________________________________________________________
Modified 09/22/2000
SNIPPETS:
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
