LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v DALE VAN WYK Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: 34-43335, Defendant: Dale Van Wyk, Plaintiff: SEC, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>34-43335, Respondent, Commission, Investment, Securities, Exchange Act, Van Wyk, Instituting, Complaint, Icc, Investment Contracts, Administrative Proceedings, Hereby, Broker-dealer, Investor Funds, Pay, Matter, Dale Van Wyk, Administrative Proceedings Pursuant, Making Findings, Admitting, Entry, Jurisdiction, Paragraph, Injunction, Respondent Consents, District, Violations, Provisions, Facts , ContentID: 120244235

Case Documents
1 2000-09-25 SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 110969
3 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 3 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
COMMISSION
INVESTMENT
SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT
VAN WYK
INSTITUTING
COMPLAINT
ICC
INVESTMENT CONTRACTS
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS
HEREBY
BROKER-DEALER
INVESTOR FUNDS
PAY
MATTER
DALE VAN WYK
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT
MAKING FINDINGS
ADMITTING
ENTRY
JURISDICTION
PARAGRAPH
INJUNCTION
RESPONDENT CONSENTS
DISTRICT
COURT
VIOLATIONS
PROVISIONS
FACTS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
before the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

   Securities Exchange Act of 1934
   Release No. 43335 / September 25, 2000

   Administrative Proceeding
   File No. 3-10299
   In the Matter of

   Dale Van Wyk,

   Respondent.
   ORDER INSTITUTING PUBLIC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO
   SECTIONS 15(b) AND 19(h) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,
   MAKING FINDINGS AND IMPOSING REMEDIAL SANCTIONS

   I.

   The Securities and Exchange Commission deems it appropriate, for the
   protection of investors and in the public interest that administrative
   proceedings be instituted against Dale Van Wyk ("Van Wyk" or
   "Respondent") pursuant to Sections 15(b) and 19(h) of the Securities
   Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act").

   In anticipation of the institution of these proceedings, Respondent
   has submitted an Offer of Settlement ("Offer") which the Commission
   has determined to accept. Solely for the purpose of these proceedings
   and any other proceeding brought by or on behalf of the Commission or
   in which the Commission is a party, and without admitting or denying
   any of the findings contained herein, except as to the jurisdiction of
   the Commission over him and over the subject matter of these
   proceedings, and the matters set forth in paragraph II. 1. below, and
   the entry of the injunction set forth in paragraph II. 3. below, which
   are admitted, Respondent consents to the entry by the Commission of
   this Order Instituting Public Administrative Proceedings Pursuant to
   Sections 15(b) and 19(h) of the Exchange Act, Making Findings and
   Imposing Remedial Sanctions ("Order").

   Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that proceedings against Respondent
   be and hereby are instituted.

   II.

   On the basis of this Order and the Offer, the Commission finds that

   A. At all relevant times, Respondent Van Wyk was associated with an
SNIPPETS:
  • SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
  • ORDER INSTITUTING PUBLIC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO
  • SECTIONS 15AND 19OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,
  • The Securities and Exchange Commission deems it appropriate, for the protection of investors
  • Solely for the purpose of these proceedings and any other proceeding brought by or on behalf
  • below, which are admitted, Respondent consents to the entry by the Commission of this Order
  • IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that proceedings against Respondent be and hereby are instituted.
  • On September 24, 1998, the Commission filed a complaint in the United States District Court
  • The Complaint charged Respondent and others with violations of certain provisions of the
  • The Commission's complaint alleged that Respondent and others had represented that a) ICC
  • In fact, investor funds were not secure and risk free because investor funds were withdrawn
  • On January 5, 1999, without admitting or denying any of the allegations contained in the
  • On April 271999, the Court permanently enjoined Respondent from future violations of Sections
  •    |