LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v D.E. FREY and COMPANY, INC Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: 34-43354, Defendant: D.E. Frey and Company, Inc., Plaintiff: SEC, State: IN Indiana, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>34-43354, Frey, Representatives, Supervision, Trading, Accounts, Registered Representatives, Securities, Colorado Springs, Independent Consultant, Commission, Engagement, Exchange Act, Investment, Customer, Denver, Unsuitable Trading, Review, Report, Respondent, Recommendations, Compliance, Atlanta, Clients, Staff, Adequate, Unauthorized Trading, Firm, Branch Manager, Trading Activity, Osj Offices , ContentID: 120244227

Case Documents
1 2000-09-26 SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 110961
7 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 7 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
REPRESENTATIVES
SUPERVISION
TRADING
ACCOUNTS
REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVES
SECURITIES
COLORADO SPRINGS
INDEPENDENT CONSULTANT
COMMISSION
ENGAGEMENT
EXCHANGE ACT
INVESTMENT
CUSTOMER
DENVER
UNSUITABLE TRADING
REVIEW
REPORT
RESPONDENT
RECOMMENDATIONS
COMPLIANCE
ATLANTA
CLIENTS
STAFF
ADEQUATE
UNAUTHORIZED TRADING
FIRM
BRANCH MANAGER
TRADING ACTIVITY
OSJ OFFICES
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Before the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

   SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
   Release No. 43354 / September 26, 2000

   ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
   File No. 3-10308
   In the Matter of

   D.E. FREY AND COMPANY, INC.

   Respondent.
   ORDER INSTITUTING PUBLIC PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 15(b) AND
   19(h) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, MAKING FINDINGS AND
   IMPOSING REMEDIAL SANCTIONS

   I.

   The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") deems it
   appropriate, in the public interest and for the protection of
   investors that administrative proceedings be instituted pursuant to
   Sections 15(b) and 19(h) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
   ("Exchange Act") against Respondent D.E. Frey and Company, Inc.,
   ("D.E. Frey" or "Respondent"). Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that
   these proceedings be, and hereby, are instituted.

   In anticipation of the institution of these administrative
   proceedings, the Respondent has submitted an Offer of Settlement
   ("Offer"), which the Commission has determined to accept. Solely for
   the purpose of these proceedings and any other proceedings brought by
   or on behalf of the Commission or in which the Commission is a party,
   and without admitting or denying the findings herein, except that the
   Respondent admits the Commission's jurisdiction over it and over the
   subject matter of these proceedings, D.E. Frey has consented by its
   Offer to the entry of the findings and the imposition of the remedial
   sanctions as to it as set forth below.

   II.

   On the basis of this Order and the Offer submitted by the Respondent,
   the Commission finds that

   A. Respondent

   D. E. Frey is a corporation registered with the Commission as a
   broker-dealer since 1988. It is a member of the National Association
SNIPPETS:
  • SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
  • D.E. FREY AND COMPANY, INC.
  • ORDER INSTITUTING PUBLIC PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 15AND 19OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
  • The Securities and Exchange Commission deems it appropriate, in the public interest and for
  • Between 1995 and 1999, three registered representatives at D.E. Frey, each of whom had a
  • D.E. Frey failed reasonably to supervise those registered representatives to prevent or
  • D.E. Frey failed to develop procedures for imposing heightened supervision where appropriate
  • Unsuitable Trading, Unauthorized Trading and Churning in Customer Accounts by Registered
  • In 1998 and 1999, a registered representative of D.E. Frey located at an office of
  • In 1998, a registered representative and branch manager of D.E. Frey located at an OSJ in
  • From October 1995 through May 1996, a registered representative of D.E. Frey located at an
  • Thirty-six of D.E. Frey's 48 branch offices are OSJ offices; three of those OSJ offices were
  • According to D.E. Frey's compliance manuals, branch managers of OSJ offices were required to
  • Specifically, D.E. Frey's written supervisory procedures required that branch managers review
  • D.E. Frey's written supervisory procedures required the compliance department to send
  • The Atlanta representative made unsuitable trading recommendations to two clients.
  • The Independent Consultant shall conduct a review of D.E. Frey's supervisory and compliance
  • At the end of that review, which in no event shall be more than 180 days after the date of
  • For the period of engagement and for a period of two years from the completion of the
  •    |