LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v DAVID C. FANNIN Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: 33-7977, Defendant: David C. Fannin, Plaintiff: SEC, State: OR Oregon, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>33-7977, Sunbeam, Sales, Securities Act, Respondent, Earnings, Management, Commission, Sales Revenue, Earnings Shortfall, Misleading, Administrative Proceedings, Pursuant, Findings, Disclosure, Drafting, Senior Management, Customers, Inventory, Violations, David, Fannin, Instituting, Price, Reports, Acceleration, Net Sales, Matter, Settlement, General Counsel , ContentID: 120244009

Case Documents
1 2001-05-15 SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 110743
5 pages
TXT
Total Documents: 1 document , 5 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
SALES
SECURITIES ACT
RESPONDENT
EARNINGS
MANAGEMENT
COMMISSION
SALES REVENUE
MEMBERS
EARNINGS SHORTFALL
MISLEADING
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS
PURSUANT
FINDINGS
DISCLOSURE
DRAFTING
SENIOR MANAGEMENT
CUSTOMERS
INVENTORY
VIOLATIONS
DAVID
FANNIN
INSTITUTING
PRICE
REPORTS
ACCELERATION
NET SALES
MATTER
SETTLEMENT
GENERAL COUNSEL
   UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
   Before the
   SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

   SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
   Release No. 7977 / May 15, 2001

   ACCOUNTING AND AUDITING ENFORCEMENT
   Release No. 1394 / May 15, 2001

   ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
   File No. 3-10482

   In the Matter of

   DAVID C. FANNIN,

   Respondent.

   ORDER INSTITUTING PUBLIC
   ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS,
   PURSUANT TO SECTION 8A OF THE
   SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, MAKING
   FINDINGS, AND IMPOSING A
   CEASE-AND-DESIST ORDER

                                     I.

   The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") deems it
   appropriate that public administrative proceedings be, and hereby are,
   instituted with respect to David C. Fannin ("Respondent") pursuant to
   Section 8A of the Securities Act of 1933 ("Securities Act").

                                    II.

   In anticipation of the institution of these administrative
   proceedings, Respondent has submitted an Offer of Settlement ("Offer")
   that the Commission has determined to accept. Solely for the purpose
   of these proceedings, and any other proceeding brought by or on behalf
   of the Commission, or to which the Commission is a party, without
   admitting or denying the findings as set forth below, except as to
   jurisdiction of the Commission over Respondent and over the subject
   matter of these proceedings, which Respondent admits, Respondent
   consents to the entry of this Order Instituting Public Administrative
   Proceedings, Pursuant to Section 8A of the Securities Act of 1933,
   Making Findings and Imposing a Cease-and-Desist Order ("Order") set
   forth below.

SNIPPETS:
  • ORDER INSTITUTING PUBLIC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS, PURSUANT TO SECTION 8A OF THE SECURITIES
  • The Securities and Exchange Commission deems it appropriate that public administrative
  • In anticipation of the institution of these administrative proceedings, Respondent has
  • Solely for the purpose of these proceedings, and any other proceeding brought by or on behalf 33, Making Findings and Imposing a Cease-and-Desist Order set forth below.
  • David C. Fannin was Executive Vice President, General Counsel, and Secretary of Sunbeam
  • From the last quarter of 1996 through the first quarter of 1998, Sunbeam engaged in a program
  • In late 1997 and early 1998, members of Sunbeam senior management, including Respondent,
  • This undisclosed approach to earnings management would predictably lead to a future earnings
  • In the first quarter of 1998 the company faced a looming earnings shortfall, as reports to
  • During this period, members of Sunbeam senior management caused to be issued several press
  • is possible that net sales for the first quarter of 1998 may be lower than the range of Wall
  • Although this release, which Respondent participated in drafting, went beyond the Company's
  • Violations of Section 17of the Securities Act.
  •    |