LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v ALL-TECH DIRECT, INC., et al Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: 34-44415, Defendant: All-Tech Direct, Inc., f/k/a All-Tech Investment Group, Inc., Harry Lefkowitz, Mark Shefts,Lisa Esposito, Ralph Zulferino, David Waldman, Adams Leeds, and Barry Parish, Plaintiff: SEC, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>34-44415, All-tech, Independent Consultant, Customers, Accounts, Margin, Exchange Act, Regulation, Waldman, Commission, Zulferino, Loans, Securities, Recommendations, Employees, Credit, Policies, Esposito, Findings, Internal Controls, Extending, Charge, Review, Relevant Period, United States, Lefkowitz, Jersey, Resides, Violations, Balance, Practices , ContentID: 120243980

Case Documents
1 2001-06-13 SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 110714
8 pages
TXT
Total Documents: 1 document , 8 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
INDEPENDENT CONSULTANT
CUSTOMERS
ACCOUNTS
MARGIN
EXCHANGE ACT
REGULATION
WALDMAN
COMMISSION
ZULFERINO
LOANS
SECURITIES
RECOMMENDATIONS
EMPLOYEES
CREDIT
POLICIES
ESPOSITO
FINDINGS
INTERNAL CONTROLS
EXTENDING
CHARGE
REVIEW
RELEVANT PERIOD
UNITED STATES
LEFKOWITZ
JERSEY
RESIDES
VIOLATIONS
BALANCE
PRACTICES
   UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
   Before the
   SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

   SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
   Release No. 44415 / June 13, 2001

   Administrative Proceedings
   File No. 3-10150
     _________________________________________________________________

   In the Matter of

   ALL-TECH DIRECT, INC., f/k/a ALL-TECH
   INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.,
   HARRY LEFKOWITZ, MARK SHEFTS,
   LISA ESPOSITO, RALPH ZULFERINO,
   DAVID WALDMAN, ADAM LEEDS, and
   BARRY PARISH

   Respondents.
     _________________________________________________________________

   ORDER MAKING FINDINGS
   IMPOSING REMEDIAL
   SANCTIONS, ISSUING
   CEASE-AND-DESIST ORDER
   AND ORDERING COMPLIANCE
   WITH UNDERTAKINGS
   AGAINST ALL-TECH DIRECT,
   INC., f/k/a ALL-TECH
   INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.

                                     I.

   On February 22, 2000, the Securities and Exchange Commission
   ("Commission") instituted public administrative and cease-and-desist
   proceedings pursuant to Sections 15(b) and 21C of the Securities
   Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act") against All-Tech Direct, Inc.
   f/k/a All-Tech Investment Group, Inc. ("All-Tech"), Harry Lefkowitz
   ("Lefkowitz"), Mark Shefts ("Shefts"), Lisa Esposito ("Esposito"),
   Ralph Zulferino ("Zulferino"), David Waldman ("Waldman"), Adam Leeds
   ("Leeds"), and Barry Parish.

                                    II.

   All-Tech has submitted an Offer of Settlement ("Offer"), which the
   Commission has determined to accept. Solely for the purpose of these
SNIPPETS:
  • SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
  • ALL-TECH DIRECT, INC., f/k/a ALL-TECH
  • INVESTMENT GROUP, INC., HARRY LEFKOWITZ, MARK SHEFTS, LISA ESPOSITO, RALPH ZULFERINO,
  • ORDER MAKING FINDINGS IMPOSING REMEDIAL SANCTIONS, ISSUING CEASE-AND-DESIST ORDER AND
  • On February 22, 2000, the Securities and Exchange Commission instituted public administrative
  • All-Tech is, and was during the relevant period, a broker-dealer registered with the
  • All-Tech offers day-trading services to customers through its principal office and fourteen
  • Shefts works in All-Tech's headquarters in Montvale, New Jersey, and resides in Tuxedo Park,
  • Harry Lefkowitz, 43, is, and was during the relevant period, Vice-President of Operations for
  • H. Throughout 1998, when the equity in certain margin accounts held by day-trading customers
  • The customers who received these loans could not otherwise cover the margin calls issued by
  • Regulation T prohibited All-Tech from supplying those customers with additional extensions of
  • The uncollateralized loans that All-Tech made in 1998 from the Z-Tech, Waldman and Leeds
  • Rule 10b-16 promulgated under the Exchange Act by directly or indirectly extending credit in
  • the balance at the beginning of the period; the date, amount and a brief description of each
  • All-Tech cease and desist, pursuant to Section 21C of the Exchange Act, from committing or
  • Within 60 days of the date of this Order, the Commission will select an independent practices, and procedures designed to achieve compliance with such Margin Regulations;
  • and, within 120 days of the date the Independent Consultant is retained by All-Tech, the
  • To further ensure the independence of the Independent Consultant, for the period of
  •    |