LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v ALL-TECH DIRECT, INC., et al Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: 34-44417, Defendant: All-Tech Direct, Inc., f/k/a All-Tech Investment Group, Inc., Harry Lefkowitz, Mark Shefts,Lisa Esposito, Ralph Zulferino, David Waldman, Adams Leeds, and Barry Parish, Plaintiff: SEC, State: OR Oregon, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>34-44417, All-tech, Account, Shefts, Customers, Margin, Exchange Act, Waldman, Loans, Commission, Zulferino, Regulation, Securities, Esposito, Credit, Z-tech Account, Charge, Lefkowitz, Relevant Period, Jersey, Balance, United States, Respondent, Resides, York, Supervisor, Extending, Southwest, Violations, Reason, Debit Balance , ContentID: 120243978

Case Documents
1 2001-06-13 SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 110712
6 pages
TXT
Total Documents: 1 document , 6 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
ACCOUNT
SHEFTS
CUSTOMERS
MARGIN
EXCHANGE ACT
WALDMAN
LOANS
COMMISSION
ZULFERINO
REGULATION
SECURITIES
ESPOSITO
CREDIT
Z-TECH ACCOUNT
CHARGE
LEFKOWITZ
RELEVANT PERIOD
JERSEY
BALANCE
UNITED STATES
RESPONDENT
RESIDES
YORK
SUPERVISOR
EXTENDING
SOUTHWEST
VIOLATIONS
REASON
DEBIT BALANCE
   UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
   Before the
   SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

   SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
   Release No. 44417 / June 13, 2001

   Administrative Proceedings
   File No. 3-10150
     _________________________________________________________________

   In the Matter of

   ALL-TECH DIRECT, INC., f/k/a ALL-TECH
   INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.,
   HARRY LEFKOWITZ, MARK SHEFTS,
   LISA ESPOSITO, RALPH ZULFERINO,
   DAVID WALDMAN, ADAM LEEDS, and
   BARRY PARISH

   Respondents.
     _________________________________________________________________

   ORDER MAKING FINDINGS
   AND IMPOSING REMEDIAL
   SANCTIONS AGAINST
   MARK SHEFTS

                                     I.

   On February 22, 2000, the Securities and Exchange Commission
   ("Commission") instituted public administrative and cease-and-desist
   proceedings pursuant to Sections 15(b) and 21C of the Securities
   Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act") against All-Tech Direct, Inc.
   f/k/a All-Tech Investment Group, Inc. ("All-Tech"), Harry Lefkowitz
   ("Lefkowitz"), Mark Shefts ("Shefts"), Lisa Esposito ("Esposito"),
   Ralph Zulferino ("Zulferino"), David Waldman ("Waldman"), Adam Leeds
   ("Leeds"), and Barry Parish.

                                    II.

   Shefts has submitted an Offer of Settlement ("Offer"), which the
   Commission has determined to accept. Solely for the purpose of these
   proceedings and any other proceeding brought by or on behalf of the
   Commission, or in which the Commission is a party, and without
   admitting or denying the findings contained herein, except for the
   jurisdiction of the Commission over him and over the subject matter of
   these proceedings, which are admitted, Shefts consents to the entry of
SNIPPETS:
  • SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
  • ALL-TECH DIRECT, INC., f/k/a ALL-TECH
  • INVESTMENT GROUP, INC., HARRY LEFKOWITZ, MARK SHEFTS, LISA ESPOSITO, RALPH ZULFERINO,
  • ORDER MAKING FINDINGS AND IMPOSING REMEDIAL SANCTIONS AGAINST MARK SHEFTS
  • On February 22, 2000, the Securities and Exchange Commission instituted public administrative
  • Shefts, 42, is, and was during the relevant period, a registered representative and President
  • All-Tech offers day-trading services to customers through its principal office and fourteen
  • Lefkowitz, 43, is, and was during the relevant period, Vice-President of Operations for
  • Lefkowitz works in All-Tech's headquarters in Montvale, New Jersey and resides in Goshen, New
  • Throughout 1998, when the equity in certain margin accounts held by day-trading customers
  • The customers who received these loans could not otherwise cover the margin calls issued by
  • Regulation T prohibited All-Tech from supplying those customers with additional extensions of
  • H. The accounts held by associated persons from which All-Tech extended credit in
  • Before making any loans from the Waldman or Z-Tech accounts, All-Tech required each customer
  • Shefts knew of certain of the loans from the Z-Tech account that were used by All-Tech
  • Rule 10b-16 promulgated under the Exchange Act by directly or indirectly extending credit in
  • the balance at the beginning of the period; the date, amount and a brief description of each
  • By reason of the foregoing, Shefts failed reasonably to supervise Esposito and Lefkowitz with
  • On the basis of the foregoing, the Commission deems it appropriate and in the public interest
  •    |