LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v ALL-TECH DIRECT, INC., et al Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: 34-44418, Defendant: All-Tech Direct, Inc., f/k/a All-Tech Investment Group, Inc., Harry Lefkowitz, Mark Shefts,Lisa Esposito, Ralph Zulferino, David Waldman, Adams Leeds, and Barry Parish, Plaintiff: SEC, State: OR Oregon, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>34-44418, All-tech, Esposito, Accounts, Exchange Act, Waldman, Margin, Commission, Customers, Loans, Zulferino, Regulation, Securities, Credit, Charge, Findings, Lefkowitz, Respondent, Sanctions, Relevant Period, Jersey, Extending, Violations, Balance, United States, Mark Shefts, Margin Department, Resides, York, Southwest, Z-tech Accounts , ContentID: 120243977

Case Documents
1 2001-06-13 SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 110711
6 pages
TXT
Total Documents: 1 document , 6 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
ESPOSITO
ACCOUNTS
EXCHANGE ACT
WALDMAN
MARGIN
COMMISSION
CUSTOMERS
LOANS
ZULFERINO
REGULATION
SECURITIES
CREDIT
CHARGE
FINDINGS
LEFKOWITZ
RESPONDENT
SANCTIONS
RELEVANT PERIOD
JERSEY
EXTENDING
VIOLATIONS
BALANCE
UNITED STATES
MARK SHEFTS
MARGIN DEPARTMENT
RESIDES
YORK
SOUTHWEST
Z-TECH ACCOUNTS
   UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
   Before the
   SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

   SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
   Release No. 44418 / June 13, 2001

   Administrative Proceedings
   File No. 3-10150
     _________________________________________________________________

   In the Matter of

   ALL-TECH DIRECT, INC., f/k/a ALL-TECH
   INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.,
   HARRY LEFKOWITZ, MARK SHEFTS,
   LISA ESPOSITO, RALPH ZULFERINO,
   DAVID WALDMAN, ADAM LEEDS, and
   BARRY PARISH

   Respondents.
     _________________________________________________________________

   ORDER MAKING FINDINGS
   IMPOSING REMEDIAL
   SANCTIONS AND ISSUING
   CEASE-AND-DESIST ORDER
   AGAINST LISA ESPOSITO

                                     I.

   On February 22, 2000, the Securities and Exchange Commission
   ("Commission") instituted public administrative and cease-and-desist
   proceedings pursuant to Sections 15(b) and 21C of the Securities
   Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act") against All-Tech Direct, Inc.
   f/k/a All-Tech Investment Group, Inc. ("All-Tech"), Harry Lefkowitz
   ("Lefkowitz"), Mark Shefts, Lisa Esposito ("Esposito"), Ralph
   Zulferino ("Zulferino"), David Waldman ("Waldman"), Adam Leeds
   ("Leeds"), and Barry Parish.

                                    II.

   Esposito has submitted an Offer of Settlement ("Offer"), which the
   Commission has determined to accept. Solely for the purpose of these
   proceedings and any other proceeding brought by or on behalf of the
   Commission, or in which the Commission is a party, and without
   admitting or denying the findings contained herein, except for the
   jurisdiction of the Commission over her and over the subject matter of
SNIPPETS:
  • SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
  • ALL-TECH DIRECT, INC., f/k/a ALL-TECH
  • INVESTMENT GROUP, INC., HARRY LEFKOWITZ, MARK SHEFTS, LISA ESPOSITO, RALPH ZULFERINO,
  • ORDER MAKING FINDINGS IMPOSING REMEDIAL SANCTIONS AND ISSUING CEASE-AND-DESIST ORDER AGAINST
  • On February 22, 2000, the Securities and Exchange Commission instituted public administrative
  • On the basis of the foregoing, Respondent Esposito hereby
  • Esposito, 34, is, and was during the relevant period, employed by All-Tech Direct, Inc. f/k/a
  • All-Tech, is, and was during the relevant period, a broker-dealer registered with the
  • All-Tech offers day-trading services to customers through its principal office and twenty-one
  • Shefts owns two percent of All-Tech directly and another 48 percent indirectly through his
  • Throughout 1998, when the equity in certain margin accounts held by day-trading customers
  • The customers who received these loans could not otherwise cover the margin calls issued by
  • Regulation T prohibited All-Tech from supplying those customers with additional extensions of
  • Before making any loans from the Waldman or Z-Tech accounts, All-Tech required each customer
  • Rule 10b-16 promulgated under the Exchange Act by directly or indirectly extending credit in
  • the balance at the beginning of the period; the date, amount and a brief description of each
  • Q. By reason of the foregoing, Esposito willfully aided and abetted, and was a cause of,
  •    |