LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v VAN R. LEWIS III Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: 33-7991, Defendant: Van R. Lewis III, Plaintiff: SEC, State: IN Indiana, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>33-7991, Lewis, Securities, Sunpoint, Customer, Exchange Act, Oip, Commission, Respondent, Broker, Complaint, Diverting, Customer Funds, Money Market, Accounts, Cfo, Adjustments, Van, Dealer, According, Pursuant, Allegations, Motion, Texas, Chief, Officer, Control, Investor, Protection, Permanent, District , ContentID: 120243953

Case Documents
1 2001-06-29 SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 110687
3 pages
TXT
Total Documents: 1 document , 3 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
SECURITIES
SUNPOINT
CUSTOMER
EXCHANGE ACT
OIP
COMMISSION
RESPONDENT
BROKER
COMPLAINT
DIVERTING
CUSTOMER FUNDS
MONEY MARKET
ACCOUNTS
CFO
ADJUSTMENTS
VAN
DEALER
ACCORDING
PURSUANT
ALLEGATIONS
MOTION
TEXAS
CHIEF
OFFICER
CONTROL
INVESTOR
PROTECTION
PERMANENT
DISTRICT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Before the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
Release No. 7991/June 29, 2001

   SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
   Release No. 44493/June 29, 2001

   ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
   File No. 3-10467
     _________________________________________________________________

   In the Matter of

   VAN R. LEWIS III
     _________________________________________________________________

   ORDER ENTERING DEFAULT,
   MAKING FINDINGS, AND
   IMPOSING REMEDIAL
   SANCTION

   The Securities and Exchange Commission (Commission) issued its Order
   Instituting Proceedings (OIP) on May 3, 2001. On June 5, 2001, the
   Division of Enforcement (Division) filed a declaration from
   Respondent, in which Respondent acknowledged receipt of the OIP on May
   8, 2001. Respondent's declaration also acknowledged that his answer to
   the OIP was due within twenty days after May 8, 2001. As of today, no
   answer has been received.

   On June 14, 2001, the Division moved for the entry of an order finding
   Respondent in default, deeming the allegations in the OIP to be true,
   and barring Respondent from association with any broker or dealer. As
   of today, no opposition to the Division's motion has been received.

   As provided by Rules 155(a)(2) and 220(f) of the Commission's Rules of
   Practice, 17 C.F.R. §§ 201.155(a)(2) and 201.220(f), Respondent is in
   default because he has failed to answer the OIP and because he has
   failed to respond to a dispositive motion.

   Accordingly, I find that the allegations in the OIP are true

   From 1988 through at least May 3, 2001, Van R. Lewis, III (Lewis), a
   Longview, Texas resident, had been a registered representative and
   principal associated with Sunpoint Securities, Inc. (Sunpoint), a
   broker-dealer registered with the Commission pursuant to Section 15(b)
SNIPPETS:
  • SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
  • VAN R. LEWIS III
  • The Securities and Exchange Commission issued its Order Instituting Proceedings on May 3,
  • On June 5, 2001, the Division of Enforcement filed a declaration from Respondent, in which
  • On June 14, 2001, the Division moved for the entry of an order finding Respondent in default,
  • no opposition to the Division's motion has been received.
  • From 1988 through at least May 3, 2001, Van R. Lewis, III, a Longview, Texas resident, had
  • Lewis was also the chief executive officer and majority shareholder of Sunpoint until
  • On May 9, 2000, a permanent injunction was entered against Lewis in the United States
  • The Commission's Complaint alleged, among other things, that from approximately December 1997
  • The Complaint further alleged that in December 1997, when Sunpoint's auditors discovered that
  • In addition, beginning in approximately December 1997, acting pursuant to a directive from
  • The net result of these adjustments was to lower substantially the balance in the omnibus
  • According to the Complaint, as a result of this scheme to divert customer funds, between
  •    |