LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEGA ENTERPRISES LTD v ACCOLADE INC Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: SELVAI171998, CourtCode: AP, CourtName: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, Plaintiff: SEGA ENTERPRISES LTD, State: CA California, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>SELVAI171998, Sega, Accolade, District Court, Cir, Game, Computer Program, Genesis, Copyright Act, Functionality, Disassemble, Sega Enterprises, Genesis Console, Game Cartridges, Object Code, Tmss Initialization Code, United States, Video Game, District Judge, Initialization Code, California, Appeals, Copyright Infringement, Copyright Protection, Plaintiff-appellee, Defendant-appellant, Preliminary Injunction, Genesis-compatible Games, Sega Message, Reverse Engineering , ContentID: 120243733

Case Documents
1 1992-07-20 APPELLATE-DECISION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 110294
27 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 1 document , 27 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . APPELLATE-DECISION

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
ACCOLADE
DISTRICT COURT
CIR
GAME
LAW
COMPUTER PROGRAM
GENESIS
COPYRIGHT ACT
FUNCTIONALITY
DISASSEMBLE
SEGA ENTERPRISES
GENESIS CONSOLE
GAME CARTRIDGES
OBJECT CODE
TMSS INITIALIZATION CODE
UNITED STATES
VIDEO GAME
DISTRICT JUDGE
INITIALIZATION CODE
CALIFORNIA
APPEALS
COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT
COPYRIGHT PROTECTION
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE
DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
GENESIS-COMPATIBLE GAMES
SEGA MESSAGE
REVERSE ENGINEERING

Appellate decision in Sega v. Accolade 977 F2d 1510 (9th Cir. 1992)
 977 F2d 1510 (9th Cir. 1992); 93 Daily Journal DAR 304
SEGA ENTERPRISES LTD., a Japanese corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
ACCOLADE, INC., a California corporation, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 92-15655
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
 July 20, 1992, Argued and Submitted, San Francisco, California
January 6, 1993, Filed
PRIOR HISTORY: Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of California. D.C. No. CV-91-3871-BAC. Barbara A. Caulfield, District Judge,
Presiding.
COUNSEL:
 William S. Coats, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, San Francisco, California, for the
defendant-appellant.
Joel Linzner, Crosby, Heafey, Roach & May, Oakland, California, for the plaintiff-
appellee.
Dennis S. Karjala, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, for amicus curiae
Copyright
Law Professors.
 Peter M. C. Choy, American Committee for Interoperable Systems, Mountain View,
California, for amicus curiae American Committee for Interoperable Systems.
 John Haven Chapman, Chapman, Moran, Hubbard, Glazer & Zimmerman, Stamford,
Connecticut; Thomas N. White, Santa Clara, California, for amicus curiae Computer and
Communications Industry Association.
 Morton David Goldberg, Schwab, Goldberg, Price & Dannay, New York, New York for
amicus curiae Computer & Business Equipment Manufactures Association, et al.
JUDGES: Before: William C. Canby, Jr., Stephen Reinhardt, and Edward Leavy, Circuit
Judges.
 Opinion by Judge Reinhardt.
OPINION: ORDER AND AMENDED OPINION
 REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:
This case presents several difficult questions of first impression involving our copyright
and trademark laws. n1 We are asked to determine, first, whether the Copyright Act
permits persons who are neither copyright holders nor licensees to disassemble a
copyrighted computer program in order to gain an understanding of the unprotected
functional elements of the program. In light of the public policies underlying the Act, we
conclude that, when the person seeking the understanding has a legitimate reason for








doing so and when no other means of access to the unprotected elements exists, such
SNIPPETS:
  • Appellate decision in Sega v. Accolade 977 F2d 1510 (9th Cir.
  • SEGA ENTERPRISES LTD., a Japanese corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ACCOLADE, INC., a
  • UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
  • July 20, 1992, Argued and Submitted, San Francisco, California January 6, 1993, Filed
  • Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
  • Law Professors.
  • n1 We are asked to determine, first, whether the Copyright Act permits persons who are
  • we must decide the legal consequences under the Lanham Trademark Act of a computer
  • Accordingly, we reverse the district court's grant of a preliminary injunction in favor of
  • We prefer to leave the decision on that question to the district court initially.
  • Background Plaintiff-appellee Sega Enterprises, Ltd., a Japanese corporation, and its
  • Prior to rendering its own games compatible with the Genesis console, Accolade explored the
  • it "reverse engineered" Sega's video game programs in order to discover the requirements for
  • At the end of the reverse engineering process, Accolade created a development manual that
  • In order to operate a computer, source code must be translated into computer readable form,
  • A program written in source code is translated into object code using a computer program
  • Sega began to explore methods of protecting its trademark rights in the Genesis and
  • the TMSS initialization code then prompts a visual display for approximately three seconds
  • According to Accolade, it did not learn until after the Genesis III was released on the
  • n3 On November 29, 1991, Sega amended its complaint to include a claim for copyright
  • At the hearing, counsel for Sega produced two game cartridges which, he represented,
  • The district court concluded that the TMSS code was not functional and that Accolade could
  • With respect to Sega's copyright claim, the district court rejected Accolade's contention
  • Second, it argues that disassembly of object code in order to gain an understanding of the
  •    |