 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1
.
US OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS MOTION TO COMPEL MEMORANDUM
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
COURT UNITED STATES INTERROGATORY FACTS DISTRICT COURT INTERVIEWS WORK-PRODUCT ATTORNEY SUPPORT AMERICAN COUNSEL HICKMAN WITNESSES WITNESS PARTY MEMORANDUM PRODUCTION ALLEGATIONS GOVERNMENT DISCLOSURE FACTS RELATING ORAL STATEMENTS FORTENBAUGH UNDULY BURDENSOME MONOPOLIZATION WORK-PRODUCT DOCTRINE DEPOSITION LITIGATION MENTAL IMPRESSIONS |
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ))
Plaintiff, )) Civil Action No. 99-1180-JTM
v. ))
AMR CORPORATION, )
AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC, and )
AMERICAN EAGLE HOLDING )
CORPORATION, ))
Defendants. ))
MEMORANDUM OF THE UNITED STATES IN SUPPORT
OF ITS OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO COMPEL
CRAIG W. CONRATH
United States Department of Justice
Antitrust Division
325 7 Street, N.W., Suite 500
th
Washington, D.C. 20530
Attorney for the United States
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Table of Contents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Table of Authorities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Argument . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
I. Defendants' Interrogatory No. 2 Impermissibly Seeks Production of
Government Work-Product and Otherwise Is Overly Broad and Unduly
Burdensome . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
A. Tying Facts Learned to Particular Witness Interviews
SNIPPETS:
|
|
2
.
TRIAL CLOSING ARGUMENTS
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
PLAINTIFFS INSTRUCTIONS ACT EVIDENCE THREATS CONSPIRACY RICO POSTER JURY DAMAGES TESTIMONY RACKETEERING ACTS VIOLATION VERDICT TRUE THREATS VIOLATE RICO REASONABLENESS ABORTION VERDICT FORM EXTORTION UNLAWFUL VIOLENCE CONFERENCE LIFE ADVOCATE INTERSTATE COMMERCE PREPONDERANCE ACLA ENTERPRISE REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH SERVICES |
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2 FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
3 PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE )
COLUMBIA/WILLAMETTE, INC., et al. )
4 )
Plaintiffs, ) CV 95-1671 JO
5 )
vs. ) January 26, 1999
6 )
AMERICAN COALITION OF LIFE ) Portland, Oregon
7 ACTIVISTS, et al. )) Volume XIV
8 Defendants. )
9
10 TRANSCRIPT OF TRIAL PROCEEDINGS
11 BEFORE THE HONORABLE ROBERT E. JONES
12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE, AND A JURY
13 APPEARANCES
14
15
FOR THE PLAINTIFF: CAROL BERNICK
16 Davis Wright Tremaine
1300 S.W. Fifth Ave., Suite 2300
17 Portland, Or 97201
503 778-5233
18
MARIA T. VULLO
19 MARTIN LONDON
ELIZABETH MARINGER
20 Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, etc.
1285 Avenue of the Americas
21 New York, NY 10019-6064
212 373-3346
22
ROGER K. EVANS
23 Planned Parenthood Federation of America
810 7th Ave.
SNIPPETS:
|
|
3
.
INDICTMENT
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
SALES PRICES CONSPIRACY INDICTMENT DEFENDANTS CO-CONSPIRATORS WORLDWIDE UNITED STATES SOLD CUSTOMERS ALLOCATE CHARGES AJINOMOTO MEETINGS MICHAEL ANDREAS AGREEMENT TELEPHONE CONVERSATIONS ADM ILLINOIS DISTRIBUTION COUNTRIES ACT PARTICIPATING VICE PRESIDENT DIRECTORS BUSINESS FIX PRICES PURPOSE |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN
DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )
)
v. )
)
MICHAEL D. ANDREAS; )
MARK E. WHITACRE; )
TERRANCE S. WILSON; and )
KAZUTOSHI YAMADA, ) Judge: Manning
)
Defendants. )
INDICTMENT
The SPECIAL JANUARY 1996 Grand Jury charges:
I.
1. The following individuals are hereby indicted and made defendants on the
stated below:
(a) MICHAEL D. ANDREAS;
(b) MARK E. WHITACRE;
(c) TERRANCE S. WILSON; and
(d) KAZUTOSHI YAMADA.
2. Beginning in or about June 1992 and continuing until approximately June 27,
1995, the exact dates being unknown to the Grand Jury, the defendants and co-conspirators,
Ajinomoto Co., Inc., Archer Daniels Midland Company, Kyowa Hakko Kogyo Co. Ltd., Sewon
America, Inc., and other corporations and individuals, entered into and engaged in a combination
and conspiracy to suppress and eliminate competition by fixing the price and allocating the sales
SNIPPETS:
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
