LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

PLANNED PARENTHOOD et al v AMERICAN COALITION OF LIFE ACTIVISTS ET AL Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: 78, CourtName: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Plaintiff: PLANNED PARENTHOOD et al, State: DC Washington D.C., UniqueCaseRef: LCD>78, Divestiture, United States, Judgement, Assets, Jury, Pump, Trustee, Complaint, Evidence, Objections, Provisions, Party, Purpose, Flowserve, Television, Deposition, Chris-craft, Summaries, Accomplish, Competition, Entry, Carol, Ferrara, Acquirer, Ruling, Affidavit, Honor, Flowserve Corporation, Representatives, Fox Television Holdings, Materials, Adjudication, Crane, Written Notice, Defense, Testimony, Jurors, Context, Subpoena, Bernick, Kathy Eismann, Reporter, Ingersoll-dresser Pump Company , ContentID: 120243713

Case Documents
1 2001-04-11 PROPOSED FINAL JUDGMENT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 113973
13 pages
PDF
2 2000-07-28 PROPOSED FINAL JUDGMENT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 113516
14 pages
PDF
3 1999-01-06 PRETRIALPROCEEDINGS
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 110220
185 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 3 documents , 212 pages
Price: $ 29.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . PROPOSED FINAL JUDGMENT

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
DIVESTITURE
UNITED STATES
JUDGEMENT
ASSETS
COURT
TELEVISION
TRUSTEE
COMPLAINT
CHRIS-CRAFT
PROVISIONS
ATTORNEYS
PARTY
ACQUIRER
FOX TELEVISION HOLDINGS
LAW
PURPOSE
ACCOMPLISH
PLAINTIFF
APPROVALS
COMPETITION
PROPOSED DIVESTITURE
AFFIDAVIT
MATERIALS
CHRIS-CRAFT INDUSTRIES
ADJUDICATION
AGREEMENT
WRITTEN NOTICE
SOLE DISCRETION
TIME PERIOD
                                          UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

____________________________________:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                                ::
                    Plaintiff,                           :      Civil Action No.        1:01CV00771
                                                         ::
                         v.                              :      JUDGE:        Colleen Kollar-Kotelly
                                                         ::     Filed: 4/11/2001
THE NEWS CORPORATION LIMITED, ::
FOX TELEVISION HOLDINGS, INC.,                           ::
                    and                                  ::
CHRIS-CRAFT INDUSTRIES, INC.,                            :
                                                         :
                    Defendants.                          ::
                                                         :
____________________________________:


                                                     FINAL JUDGMENT

        WHEREAS, plaintiff, United States of America, filed its Complaint on April 11th, 2001,

and defendants, The News Corporation Limited ("News Corp"), Fox Television Holdings, Inc.

("FOX"), and Chris-Craft Industries, Inc. ("Chris-Craft"), by their respective attorneys, have

to the entry of this Final Judgment without trial or adjudication of any issue of fact or law, and

Final Judgment constituting any evidence against or admission by any party regarding any issue of

law;



        AND WHEREAS, defendants agree to be bound by the provisions of this Final Judgment

pending its approval by the Court;

        AND WHEREAS, the essence of this Final Judgment is the prompt and certain divestiture of

certain rights or assets by the defendants to assure that competition is not substantially lessened;

        AND WHEREAS, plaintiff requires defendants to make certain divestitures for the purpose of

remedying the loss of competition alleged in the Complaint;

        AND WHEREAS, defendants have represented to the United States that the divestitures

SNIPPETS:
  • WHEREAS, plaintiff, United States of America, filed its Complaint on April 11th, 2001,
  • and defendants, The News Corporation Limited, Fox Television Holdings, Inc.
  • , and Chris-Craft Industries, Inc., by their respective attorneys, have consented
  • to the entry of this Final Judgment without trial or adjudication of any issue of fact or law,
  • defendants agree to be bound by the provisions of this Final Judgment
  • certain rights or assets by the defendants to assure that competition is not substantially
  • as grounds for asking the Court to modify any of the divestiture provisions contained below;
  • E. "Divestiture Assets" means all of the assets, tangible or intangible, used in the operation
  • slogans, programming materials, and promotional materials relating to KTVX-TV;
  • G. "Acquirer" means the entity to whom defendants divest the Divestiture Assets.
  • States, in its sole discretion, may agree to an extension of this time period of up to two
  • all regulatory approvals necessary for such divestitures,
  • the Court shall appoint a trustee selected by the United States and approved by the Court
  • bankers, attorneys, or other agents, who shall be solely accountable to the trustee,
  • setting forth the trustee's efforts to accomplish the divestiture ordered under
  • have the right to make additional recommendations consistent with the purpose of the trust.
  • Within two business days following execution of a definitive divestiture agreement,
  • notify the United States of any proposed divestiture required by Section IV or V of this
  • United States may request from defendants, the proposed Acquirer, any other third party, or
  • If the United States provides written notice that it does not object,
  • Each such affidavit shall include the name,

  • 2 . PROPOSED FINAL JUDGMENT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    DEFENDANTS
    UNITED STATES
    JUDGEMENT
    ASSETS
    PUMP
    COURT
    FLOWSERVE
    TRUSTEE
    COMPLAINT
    ENTRY
    PROVISIONS
    PLAINTIFF
    ATTORNEYS
    PARTY
    PURPOSE
    FLOWSERVE CORPORATION
    REPRESENTATIVES
    ACCOMPLISH
    INGERSOLL-DRESSER PUMP COMPANY
    COMPETITION
    PROPOSED DIVESTITURES
    DIVESTITURE PLANT
    AFFIDAVIT
    MATERIALS
    ADJUDICATION
    IDP
    DIVESTITURE REPAIR FACILITIES
    ALLIANCE CUSTOMERS SHELL
    WRITTEN NOTICE
    
                                    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                                    FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
    
    
     UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    
                                                            Civil Action No. 001818
                             Plaintiff,
                                                            Judge Jackson
                              v.
    
     INGERSOLL-DRESSER PUMP COMPANY,
    
     INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY,
    
     and
      FLOWSERVE CORPORATION,
                             Defendants.
    
    
                                      PROPOSED FINAL JUDGMENT
    
            WHEREAS, plaintiff, United States of America, filed its Complaint on July 28, 2000,
    
    plaintiff and defendants, by their respective attorneys, have consented to the entry of this Final
    
    Judgment without trial or adjudication of any issue of fact or law, and without this Final Judgment
    
    constituting any evidence against or admission by any party regarding any issue of fact or law;
    
            AND WHEREAS, defendants agree to be bound by the provisions of this Final Judgment
    
    pending its approval by the Court;
    
            AND WHEREAS, the essence of this Final Judgment is the prompt and certain divestiture
    
    of certain rights or assets by the defendants to assure that competition is not substantially
    
    lessened;
    
            AND WHEREAS, plaintiff requires defendants to make certain divestitures for the
    
    
    
    purpose of remedying the loss of competition alleged in the Complaint;
    
              AND WHEREAS, defendants have represented to the United States that the divestitures
    
    required below can and will be made and that defendants will later raise no claim of hardship or
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • INGERSOLL-DRESSER PUMP COMPANY,
  • WHEREAS, plaintiff, United States of America, filed its Complaint on July 28, 2000,
  • plaintiff and defendants, by their respective attorneys, have consented to the entry of this
  • Judgment without trial or adjudication of any issue of fact or law,
  • constituting any evidence against or admission by any party regarding any issue of fact or
  • defendants agree to be bound by the provisions of this Final Judgment
  • the essence of this Final Judgment is the prompt and certain divestiture
  • of certain rights or assets by the defendants to assure that competition is not substantially
  • difficulty as grounds for asking the Court to modify any of the divestiture provisions
  • Divestiture Assets.
  • "Flowserve" means defendant FLOWSERVE CORPORATION,
  • F. "Divestiture Plant" means Flowserve&s pump plant in Tulsa, Oklahoma, including
  • "Flowserve," "I-R" and "IDP," and predecessor acquired companies), technical information,
  • designs, design protocols, specifications for materials, specifications for parts and
  • H. "Divestiture Repair Facilities" means the IDP service centers in Batavia,
  • years from entry of this Final Judgment for installation within the United States,
  • may continue to sell parts for the J and VLT pump lines to its alliance customers Shell and
  • Section IV, or by trustee appointed pursuant to Section V, of this Final Judgment, shall
  • and the Court setting forth the trustee's efforts to accomplish the divestitures ordered
  • purpose of the trust.
  • shall notify the United States of any proposed divestitures required by Section IV
  • United States shall provide written notice to defendants and the trustee, if there is one,
  • defendants shall deliver to the United States an affidavit as to the fact and manner of its
  • from time to time duly authorized representatives of the United

  • 3 . PRETRIALPROCEEDINGS

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    DEFENDANT
    COURT
    EVIDENCE
    OBJECTIONS
    PLAINTIFF
    DEPOSITION
    SUMMARIES
    CAROL
    FERRARA
    RULING
    COUNSEL
    HONOR
    LAW
    CRANE
    DEFENSE
    TESTIMONY
    JURORS
    CONTEXT
    SUBPOENA
    BERNICK
    KATHY EISMANN
    REPORTER
    WITNESSES
    CONFERENCE
    QUESTIONNAIRE
    WITNESS
    ADMISSION
    PRIZE STUDENT
    PRACTICE
    
    
    
    
          1               IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
    
          2                        FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
    
          3    PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE                  )
               COLUMBIA/WILLAMETTE, INC., et al. )
          4                                               )
                                  Plaintiffs,             ) CV 95-1671 JO
          5                                               )
                        vs.                               ) January 6, 1999
          6                                               )
               AMERICAN COALITION OF LIFE                 ) Portland, Oregon
          7    ACTIVISTS, et al.                          ))
          8                      Defendants.              )
    
          9
    
         10                    TRANSCRIPT OF PRETRIAL PROCEEDINGS
    
         11               BEFORE THE HONORABLE ROBERT E. JONES
    
         12                    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
    
         13                                APPEARANCES
    
         14
    
         15
               FOR THE PLAINTIFF: CAROL BERNICK
         16                            Davis Wright Tremaine
                                       1300 S.W. Fifth Ave., Suite 2300
         17                            Portland, Or 97201
                                       503 778-5233
         18
                                       MARIA T. VULLO
         19                            MARTIN LONDON
                                       ELIZABETH MARINGER
         20                            Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, etc.
                                       1285 Avenue of the Americas
         21                            New York, NY 10019-6064
                                       212 373-3346
         22
                                       ROGER K. EVANS
         23                            Planned Parenthood Federation of America
                                       810 7th Ave.
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • 15 FOR THE PLAINTIFF: CAROL BERNICK
  • FOR THE DEFENDANTS CHRISTOPHER A. FERRARA
  • 11 My prize student in law school and was with me on the
  • and then she was out in practice for a
  • 17 senior editor of McCormick on evidence,
  • 21 the jury.
  • And Kathy Eismann is our real-time reporter.
  • Don't ask permission of the court.
  • know you will be busy grabbing another witness,
  • yourself or be talking, when the witnesses are testifying,
  • "counsel knows full well that this is
  • and you take my ruling.
  • trials with no objections whatsoever.
  • the defense objects to any evidence that deals
  • with evidence in context, because your theory is that's not
  • 20 I can make immediate rulings on what's an admission of a
  • 25 track as to each defendant.
  • conference, which I think is fairly extensive.
  • The jurors, apparently, are going to be
  • 15 discuss that with your Honor.
  • The other issue is the deposition summaries
  • 14 agreement that the questions in the questionnaire were a
  • Mr. Crane, and Mr. Dodd, in our case.
  • We decided to subpoena them in order to protect
  • 20 completed Mr. Crane's second volume of testimony.
  •    |