LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

PLANNED PARENTHOOD et al v AMERICAN COALITION OF LIFE ACTIVISTS ET AL Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: 85, CourtName: MISC 3, Plaintiff: PLANNED PARENTHOOD et al, State: OR Oregon, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>85, Witness, Context, Admissibility, Objection, Threats, Motion, Exhibit, Permanent Injunction, Jury, Protected Speech, Nuremberg Files, Abortion, Honor, Acts, Distributing, Health, Posters, Newhall, Conspiracy, Coconspirators, Evidence, Hearsay, Relevance, Communication, Agents, Intent, Deposition, True Threats, Testimony, Violence, Trial Exhibit, Catholics, First Amendment, Response, Stipulation, Warren Hern, Elizabeth Newhall, James Newhall, Planned Parenthood, Columbia/willamette, Bodily Harm , ContentID: 120243710

Case Documents
1 2000-02-25 PERMANENT INJUNCTION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 110215
10 pages
PDF
2 1998-11-02 PRETRIAL CONF 11398
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 110217
176 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 2 documents , 186 pages
Price: $ 24.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . PERMANENT INJUNCTION

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
PERMANENT INJUNCTION
DEFENDANTS
PLAINTIFFS
COURT
HEALTH
NEWHALL
AGENTS
INTENT
TRUE THREATS
TRIAL EXHIBIT
DISTRIBUTING
WARREN HERN
ELIZABETH NEWHALL
JAMES NEWHALL
PLANNED PARENTHOOD
COLUMBIA/WILLAMETTE
BUSINESS
BODILY HARM
POSTER
NUREMBERG FILES
PUBLISHING
VIOLATION
WEB SITE
LAW
ASSAULT
KILL
EMPLOYEES
ACT
REPRODUCING


           ********** Court Filing Stamp *********
           *                                              *
           *                     FILED                    *
           *                                              *
           *             1999 FEB 25 A 9:02               *
           *                                              *
           *          CLERK.....illegible.....COURT       *
           *                DISTRICT OF OREGON            *
           *                 PORTLAND, OREGON             *
           *                                              *
           *           BY__________________________       *
           ***************************************



                 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                        FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE                         )
COLUMBIA/WILLAMETTE, INC.;                        )
ET AL.,                                           ))
                             Plaintiffs,          )     Civil No 95-1671-JO
                                                  )
                v.                                )     ORDER AND PERMANENT
                                                  )     INJUNCTION
AMERICAN COALITION OF LIFE                        )
ACTIVISTS; ET AL.,                                ))
                             Defendants.          )

     Plaintiffs, Dr. Robert Crist, Dr. Warren Hern, Dr. Elizabeth

Newhall, Dr. James Newhall, Planned Parenthood of the

Columbia/Willamette, Inc. and Portland Feminist Women's Health

Center, doing business as All Women's Health Services

(collectively "plaintiffs"), commenced this action seeking a

permanent injunction, damages and other relief. The trial before

the jury having been concluded, and the jury having found that

defendants did issue true threats against plaintiffs, and this

SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
  • Plaintiffs, Dr. Robert Crist, Dr. Warren Hern, Dr. Elizabeth
  • Newhall, Dr. James Newhall, Planned Parenthood of the
  • Columbia/Willamette, Inc. and Portland Feminist Women's Health
  • doing business as All Women's Health Services
  • defendants did issue true threats against plaintiffs,
  • The Poster of Dr. Robert Crist (Trial Exhibit 5) is a
  • true threat to bodily harm, assault or kill one or more of the
  • An a result of the defendants' issuance of these
  • and thus have no adequate remedy at law.
  • "Deadly Dozen" Poster, the Poster of Dr. Robert Crist and the
  • "Nuremberg Files" with specific intent and malice in a blatant
  • and illegal communication of true threats to kill,
  • PAGE 2 - ORDER AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION
  • violation of a statute.
  • CHARLES WYSONG, and their agents and
  • Robert Crist, Dr. Warren Hern, Dr. Elizabeth Newhall,
  • members, officers, agents, servants, employees,
  • Access to Clinics Entrances Act,
  • Publishing, republishing, reproducing and/or
  • distributing anywhere, either directly or indirectly,
  • A "mirror web site" within the meaning of this Order means a web site created by an

  • 2 . PRETRIAL CONF 11398

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    WITNESS
    CONTEXT
    ADMISSIBILITY
    OBJECTION
    MOTION
    EXHIBIT
    JURY
    PROTECTED SPEECH
    ABORTION
    HONOR
    ACTS
    POSTERS
    CONSPIRACY
    COCONSPIRATORS
    EVIDENCE
    HEARSAY
    NUREMBERG FILES
    RELEVANCE
    COMMUNICATION
    DEPOSITION
    TESTIMONY
    VIOLENCE
    CATHOLICS
    FIRST AMENDMENT
    DISTRIBUTING
    RESPONSE
    STIPULATION
    REASONABLENESS
    PHONE RECORDS
    
                                                                            138
    
    
    
          1                 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
    
          2                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
    
          3    PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE                    )
               COLUMBIA/WILLAMETTE, INC., et al. )
          4                                                 )
                                    Plaintiffs,             ) CV 95-1671 JO
          5                                                 )
                          vs.                               ) November 2, 1998
          6                                                 )
               AMERICAN COALITION OF LIFE                   ) Portland, Oregon
          7    ACTIVISTS, et al.                            )) Volume II
          8                        Defendants.              )
    
          9
    
         10                       TRANSCRIPT OF PRETRIAL CONFERENCE
    
         11                 BEFORE THE HONORABLE ROBERT E. JONES
    
         12                      UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
    
         13                                  APPEARANCES
    
         14
    
         15    FOR THE PLAINTIFF: CAROL BERNICK
                                         Davis Wright Tremaine
         16                              1300 S.W. Fifth Ave., Suite 2300
                                         Portland, Or 97201
         17                              503 778-5233
    
         18                              MARIA T. VULLO
                                         ELIZABETH MARINGER
         19                              Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, etc.
                                         1285 Avenue of the Americas
         20                              New York, NY 10019-6064
                                         212 373-3346
         21
               FOR DEFENDANTS:           MARK BELZ
         22    Dreste, Wysong,           Belz & Jones, P.C.
               Foreman                   7777 Bonhomme Street, Suite 1710
         23                              St. Louis, Mo. 63105-1911
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • and let's kind of digest this witness list.
  • 14 admissibility of some of these documents.
  • 19 be handled by stipulation, such as the FBI telling --20 informing people, if that's all
  • 13 what relevance is it that the patient should -- what --14 what's the relevance of a
  • 19 before the conspiracy, and what's the relevance of the
  • The acts of one --23 once you can make your showing of a conspiracy,
  • declarations of coconspirators,
  • 17 that were not the acts of the defendants themselves.
  • 25 they want to introduce a truck load of such evidence.
  • 12 just don't see how we can have an entire context of events,
  • think that is what their motion in limine seeks to address
  • with our response to that.
  • 19 sort of climate of violence is not admissible in the case.
  • part that I would like to brief further for your Honor.
  • that in the law of conspiracy or through a hearsay
  • 25 quasi-criminalize protected speech.
  • First Amendment,
  • posters, for example, of doctors that were shot.
  • that made this ambiguous communication a threat.
  • exhibit, I wanted to clarify something that I said
  • the book was part of the Nuremberg Files when they were
  • 17 issues for the jury in this case.
  • because abortion is legalized.
  • objection to them stating what they meant.
  • is what their intent was in distributing
  • 23 their basic testimony of their beliefs,
  • 12 reasonableness of the statement.
  • 10 his deposition, and, honestly, I haven't reviewed it, but I
  • 22 partial statement to be used against the Catholics,
  •    |