LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

ENGLE v RJR TOBACCO Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: EVRT92912, CourtName: IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE, Plaintiff: ENGLE, State: FL Florida, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>EVRT92912, Tobacco, Motion, Directed Verdict, Jury, Philip Morris, Evidence, Cigarettes, Punitive Damages, Remittitur, Market, Net Worth, Defense, Class Action, Causation, Rjr, Mundstock, Reynolds Tobacco, Mistrials, Decertify, Liability, Testimony, Punitive Damage Award, Set Aside, Judgement, Conspiracy, According , ContentID: 120243666

Case Documents
1   VERDICT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 110088
2 pages
PDF
2   JUDGEMENT-ORDER
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 110087
66 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 2 documents , 68 pages
Price: $ 24.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . VERDICT

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
No key words
found in document.
--------------
This indicates that
document is an image.
--------------
Images in PDF files
often contain text
readable by persons
but not by scanners.
















































SNIPPETS:

2 . JUDGEMENT-ORDER

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
COURT
TOBACCO
MOTION
PLAINTIFFS
DIRECTED VERDICT
LAW
JURY
PHILIP MORRIS
EVIDENCE
CIGARETTES
PUNITIVE DAMAGES
REMITTITUR
MARKET
NET WORTH
DEFENSE
CLASS ACTION
CAUSATION
RJR
MUNDSTOCK
REYNOLDS TOBACCO
MISTRIALS
DECERTIFY
LIABILITY
TESTIMONY
PUNITIVE DAMAGE AWARD
SET ASIDE
JUDGEMENT
CONSPIRACY
ACCORDING
                                                                          IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF
                                                                           ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
                                                                          IN AND FOR DADE COUNTY,
                                                                          FLORIDA

                                                                          General Jurisdiction
                                                                          CASE NO. 94-08273 CA -22


HOWARD A. ENGLE, MD., et. al.,
                     Plaintiffs,
v.

RJ REYNOLDS TOBACCO ,et.,al.,
                     Defendants
------------------------------------------------/

                        FINAL JUDGMENT AND AMENDED OMNIBUS ORDER


                     THIS CAUSE  having come on to be heard on the Defendants'    "Motion At

The Conclusion Of Phase II-B For A New Trial Or Remittitur, To Set Aside The

Verdict, And For Entry Of Judgement In Accordance With Defendants' Motions For

Directed Verdict, To Grant All Motions For Mistrial previously pending Or Denied, To

Decertify The Class. and Alternative Motion For New Trial", and the Court having been

fully advised pursuant to over 190 pages contained in the "Motion", and in addition, having

read the 78 page memo in support for a New Trial and Or Remittitur, and in addition having

read over the contents of 6 rather voluminous loose leaf volumes submitted by the

defense, and several other equally voluminous loose leaf volumes submitted by the

plaintiffs, and  having reviewed the applicable Law as submitted by both sides, the Court

feels it can rule on the issues without further argument, oral or otherwise.



                                                                    1



SNIPPETS:
  • RJ REYNOLDS TOBACCO,et.,al.,
  • THIS CAUSE having come on to be heard on the Defendants' "Motion At
  • The Conclusion Of Phase II-B For A New Trial Or Remittitur, To Set Aside The
  • Directed Verdict, To Grant All Motions For Mistrial previously pending Or Denied, To
  • Decertify The Class.
  • plaintiffs, and having reviewed the applicable Law as submitted by both sides, the Court
  • This Case was brought alleging eight separate counts­1- Strict Liability,
  • The defense filed motions for directed verdict as to each count and the Court will
  • it should be noted that the jury in both Phase I and II A found each of the
  • market by the defendants were defective in many ways including the fact that the cigarettes
  • The evidence more than sufficiently
  • Burton v R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.,
  • about causation in face of the over whelming contrary body of evidence worldwide.
  • count and the Conspiracy count below.
  • testimony revealed that each smoked and were exposed to the various brands
  • We conclude that, because of the dispute surrounding these allegations, the date of the last
  • Motion for Directed Verdict on the issue of Punitive damages
  • The Court has already ruled upon the Motions for Directed Verdicts and Mistrials
  • In assessing whether a case should be classified as a "class action" lawsuit,
  • see also Broin v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc., 641 So.2d 288.
  • a multi-billion dollar punitive damage award.
  • and effect of the term "net worth" as it relates to the imposition of punitive damages.
  • He said, for example, that RJR
  • He said according to the way Philip
  •    |