 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1
.
TITLE
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
COUNTY CLERK YORK COUNTY PETITIONER RESPONDENT |
COUNTY CLERK, NEW YORK COUNTY
Application for INDEX NUMBER pursuant to
C.P.L.R.
FEE 835.00
Spaces below to be TYPED or PRINTED by applicant
Dono,rritcinlhirsptm
TITLE i3F ACTION OR PROCEEDING
CHECK O&E
EEI~T~"
cl TRANSACTION
Name and address of +JQ&-y--J t\vk+Ak5
Attorney for Plaintiff ";`b qsls&&~ qi&)tb-i.
of Petitioner.
Telephone No. iJ,y
QWJA q&u (
x\2- 73 3 b q&A!
Name-and address of \
Attorney for Defendant
or Respondent.
Telephone No.
A. Nature and object of action 0~ 7 0 `L--" \ N b
Q v L.- \ N \ +yA'i;-i
Nature of special proceeding
Et. Application for Index Number filed-by: Plaintiff
C. Date of Service of Summons
now being filed
YE& NOCi
D. Is a Provisional Remedy being sought in odv rice of
with the
YESO NO xf
\
87 68249
Checked by
DO NOT WRITE ON LINE IMMEDlATElY
SNIPPETS:
|
|
2
.
ANSWER
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
PARAGRAPHS COMPLAINT RESPONSC ASSERTING PLAINTIFF FORECAST YORK TIFF NEGLIGENCE COURT AGREEMENT PARTIES ANC FEASIBILITY ADMITS RELIEF DANT INTER ALIA FORECAST PERIOD VARIATION REPRESENTATION ACHIEVABILITY UNDERLYING PECTATIONS ULTIMATE REALIZATION BURSEMENTS FEES GRANTING DEEM |
PILOT DEVELOPMENT RATON, INC., : INDEX NO. 87- 18249
Plaintiff,
, ! -V- ANSWER
Defendant Grant Thornton, by its attorneys Stroock &
Stroock & Lavan, as and for an answer to the complaint of p l ain-
, i ~ tiff herein, alleges as follows:
, '
I
~ 1. Admits the allegations s e t forth i n paragraphs
~
2 and 5.
2. Denies knowledge or information sufficient to for
a belief as to the allegations set forth in paragraphs 4 and 1 6 .
~
3. Denies each and every allegation s e t forth in
paragraphs 12, 13, 14, 15, 17, 19, 20, 23 and 24.
4 . Admits the allegations s e t forth in paragraph 1
but specifically denies that any grounds exist for an action in
breach of contract or negligence.
5. Denies each and every allegation set forth in
paragraphs 6 , 8 , 9, 10 and 11 in the form alleged, and respect-
fully refers this Court to the agreement between the parties anc
the feasibility study f o r the complete terms of each.
6 . Denies each and every allegation set forth in
paragraphs 7 and 22 i n the form alleged, except admits that
I 'defendant exercises due care in the preparation of feasibility
; mi
, #
;:studies,
and admits t h a t defendant was hired and paid by plain-
SNIPPETS:
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
