LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

ALVIN DWORMAN v ARTHUR ANDERSEN Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: DVA59290, CourtCode: SU, CourtName: NEW YORK STATE SUPERIOR COURT WEEK OF, Plaintiff: ALVIN DWORMAN, State: NY New York, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>DVA59290, Dworman, Cplr, York, Judgement, Res Judicata, Complaint, Merits, Motion, Frigitemp, Fraud, Failure, Dismiss, Thrift Credit Corporation, Accounting, Memorandum, Certification, Credit, Allegations, Koffman, Negligence, Risk, Appellate Division, Amount, Burton, Alvin Dworman, Financial Statements, Suffer, Obligations, Proper, Audit, County, Saudi Contract, Reliance, Allegation, Dismissal Pursuant, Sounding, Alleges, Preparation, Act, Guarantors, Indemnitors, Injury, Damages, Supreme Court , ContentID: 120243594

Case Documents
1   TITLE
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 115877
2 pages
PDF
2   REPLY MEMO MTD
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 108747
10 pages
PDF
3   MOTION TO DISMISS
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 108741
6 pages
PDF
4   DEF MEMO SUP MTD
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 108740
20 pages
PDF
5 2001-03-21 NOT DEPOSITION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 108744
2 pages
PDF
6 2000-05 STIPULATION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 115876
2 pages
PDF
7 2000-05 NTC OF APPEAL
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 108746
2 pages
PDF
8 2000-03-02 NOT DEOSITION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 108743
2 pages
PDF
9 1983-03-11 MOTION TO DISMISS
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 108742
5 pages
PDF
10 1983-02-13 NOT DEPOSITION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 108745
2 pages
PDF
11 1978-03-20 COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 115875
20 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 11 documents , 73 pages
Price: $ 69.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . TITLE

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
INDEX
SUMMONS
COUNTY
PROCEEDING
TRANSACTION
ATTORNEY
PLAINTIFF
DEFENDANT
ALIAS
KASANOF
SCHWARTZ
LASON
AVCR1UT
PETITIONER
DEI-J YORK
YORJL
IDQL
LLLJ
MWW
MOMXII
RESPONDENT
SAKK
BIEW YORK
SIRZI
NATURE
SPECIAL PROCEEDING
YESCI
PROVISIONAL REMEDY
YESC
                 46s3004R-            125M-78
                                                                  <-

                                    ~ D d  /p        :  *


                                  )JfT
                                                 COUNTY  CLERK,  NEW  YORK  COUNTY
                            " ?;:`I/

                                  t' INDEX                               NuMf3ER
                               Application                         for  INDEX              NUMBER  
             8018,
                               C.P.L.R.
                                                                                                   
                                                                                          FEE 

                               Spaces                    below          to  be  TYPED  or  PRINTED 
                                             Do  not  write  in  this  spare

                                                                                    TITLE  OF 
                                                    CHECK                  ONE

                                                                         EWIMER

                                                    cl                   TRANSACTION

                                          .-      ,"
                                ALIAS                      dWJik.L-LNy                     i~Liw01J
                                                                         NOT

                                                                  i      ~N~MER
                                .di  1m1  ylj&;i,                       i'  (J:L


SNIPPETS:
 
  • COUNTY CLERK, NEW YORK COUNTY
  • for INDEX
  • TITLE OF ACTION OR PROCEEDING
  • TRANSACTION
  • ALIAS
  • KASANOf
  • SCHWARTZ
  • LASON
  • Attorney
  • G `7 *Y,`h1rd Avcr1ut;
  • or Petitioner.
  • dei-J York; New
  • YorJL
  • IdQl']
  • (LlLj
  • AW..U:L~, MWW'~
  • & MOMXII
  • or Respondent.
  • New Sakk,
  • Sirzi -13:<1;q
  • Nature and object of action or _-_
  • _ .-.-,--Nature of special proceeding -.-
  • Plaintiff Cl
  • Defendant I3
  • Is Summons now being filed?
  • YESCI
  • Is a Provisional Remedy being sought in advance of or simultaneous
  • YESC!

  • 2 . REPLY MEMO MTD

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    DWORMAN
    YORK
    THRIFT CREDIT CORPORATION
    COURT
    MEMORANDUM
    MOTION
    SAUDI CONTRACT
    FRIGITEMP
    CPLR
    FRAUD
    KOFFMAN
    ALLEGATION
    COMPLAINT
    RES JUDICATA
    ALVIN DWORMAN
    BURTON
    DEFENDANT
    SUPPORT
    DISMISS
    JUDGEMENT
    APPELLATE DIVISION
    SUPREME COURT
    COUNTY
    UPREME COURT
    ZOUNTY
    PRIOR SUIT
    NATIONAL BANK
    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
    LOSS SUSTAINED PLAINTIFFS
    
    SUPREME COURT OF THE  STATE  OF  NEW  YORK
    COUNTY OF  NEW  YORK
    
    
    ALVIN DWORMAN,  BURTON  I.  KOFFMAN
    and THRIFT CREDIT  CORPORATION,
    
                             Plaintiffs,
                      -against-                             Index N o .   2595/83
    ARTHUR  ANDERSEN  &  CO. I
    
                             Defendant.
    - - - - - -  - - - - - - - - - - - -  -X
    
                       DEFENDANT'S REPLY  MEMORANDUM
                      IN SUPPORT  OF MOTION TO DISMISS
    
    
                                       BREED, ABBOTT  &  MORGAN
                                       C i t i c o r p  Center
                                       153 East 53rd Street
                                       New York,  New York 10022
                                            (212) 888-0800
    
                                                      -and-
    
                                       WILSON  &  McILVAINE
                                       135 South  LaSalle Street
                                       Chicago, Illinois 60603
                                            (312) 263-1212
    
                                       Attorneys  f o r   Defendant
                                       Arthur  Andersen  &  Co.
    
    
    
    ;UPREME  COURT  OF  THE  STATE  OF  NEW  YORK
    
    ZOUNTY  OF  NEW  YORK
    
    
    ALVIN  DWORMAN,  BURTON  I.  KOFFMAN
    and  THRIFT CREDIT  CORPORATION,
                                              P l a i n t i f f s ,
                           - a g a i n s t -                                                       I n
    
    lRTHUR  ANDERSEN  &  CO. #
                                              D e f e n d a n t .
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK
  • ALVIN DWORMAN, BURTON I. KOFFMAN
  • and THRIFT CREDIT CORPORATION,
  • DEFENDANT'S REPLY MEMORANDUM
  • IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS
  • ;UPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
  • ZOUNTY OF NEW YORK
  • _ - - - - - - - - - - e - - - - - - Defendant A r t h u r Andersen & Co. s u b m i t s
  • ground of res j u d i c a t a, u n d e r CPLR 3 2 1 1 f o r f a i l u r e t o s t a t e a c a
  • Appellate Division and Court of Appeals decisions in Dworman I suffice to support dismissal.
  • Plaintiffs' memorandum ("Pl.
  • The complaint alleges that Frigitemp International
  • the Eirm of accountants which was engaged to examine and report upon Frigitemp's financial
  • Plaintiffs were to receive fees totalling $943,000 for serving as sureties on the letter of
  • Plaintiffs' response to the res judicata aspect of And en's
  • Plainti*fs maintain that thc Appellate Division rested its decision on a finding that the
  • Dworman I was n o t "on t h e merits," p l a i n t i f f s make n o s a t i s f a c t o r y r
  • This provision is concerned with limitations of time, and provides that B new action may be
  • of scienter for each and every item of wrongdoing charged, rather than j u s t one such
  • Plaintiffs Do Not Plead a Causal Connection Between the Alleged Misrepresentation and the
  • What plaintiffs disregard, however, is that these alleged losses were incurred not because of

  • 3 . MOTION TO DISMISS

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    DEFENDANT
    MOTION
    ACCOUNTING
    CPLR
    FRAUD
    COURT
    SOUNDING
    ALLEGES
    ALLEGATION
    NEGLIGENCE
    ULTRAMARES
    TRUST
    RICH
    DISMISS
    RES
    PURSUANT
    FRIGITEMP
    MISLEADING
    CERTIFIES
    PARAGRAPH
    TOUCHE
    PRIOR
    BAR
    ROSS
    LEE
    COMPLAINT PURS
    RECOVER DAMAGES
    EXTENDING
    DWORMAN
    
    SUPREME  COURT  : NEW  YORK COUNTY
    S P E C I A L   TERM     : PART I
    
    
    ALVIN  D W O W N ,   BURTON  I.  KOFFMAN
    and  THRIFT  CREDIT  CORPORATION,
    
                                        P l a i n t i f f s ,
                     - against-                                                              I
                                                                            Motion N o   9 of
    ARTHUR  ANDERSEN  &  CO.,                                               March  11,  1 9 8 3
    
    
    
    
    FRAIMAN,  J . :
    
                     By  t h i s  motion  defendant  Arthur Andersen  &  Co.,
    
    an  accounting  firm,  moves  t o  dismiss  t h e   complaint  pur-
    
    s u a n t   t o  CPLR  3211Ca) ( 5 )  on  t h e   ground  of  res  j u d i c a t a ,
    
    o r   pursuant  t o  CPLR  3211(a) ( 7 )   on  t h e   ground  t h a t   it
    
    f a i l s  t o   state a  cause  of  a c t i o n ,   o r   pursuant t o  CPLR
    
    3016(b) on  t h e   ground  t h a t   it  f a i l s  t o  p l e a d   f r a u d   w i t h
    
    s u f f i c i e n t   d e t a i l .   By  t h e i r   complaint  p l a i n t i f f s   seek
    
    t o   recover  damages  t h e y   a l l e g e d l y   s u s t a i n e d   as  a  r e s u l t
    
    of  extending  c r e d i t   to Frigitemp Corp.,  a  c l i e n t   of
    
    Arthur  Andersen,  based  upon  a l l e g e d l y   f a l s e   and  misleading
    
    f i n a n c i a l   s t a t e m e n t s   of  Friqitemp  prepared  and  c e r t i f i e d
    
    by  defendant.
    
                     This i s  t h e   second  a c t i o n   brought  by  t h e s e
    
    p l a i n t i f f s   a g a i n s t   defendant.  The f i r s t   a c t i o n   was  dis-
    
    
    
    missed  by  t h e   A p p e l l a t e   Division.  Dworman  v.  Lee,  8 3   A.D.
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • SUPREME COURT: NEW YORK COUNTY S P E C I A L TERM: PART I
  • By t h i s motion defendant Arthur Andersen & Co.,
  • an accounting firm, moves t o dismiss t h e complaint purs u a n t t o CPLR 3211Ca) on t h e
  • f a i l s t o state a cause of a c t i o n, o r pursuant t o CPLR
  • By t h e i r complaint p l a i n t i f f s seek
  • t o recover damages t h e y a l l e g e d l y s u s t a i n e d as a r e s u l t
  • of extending c r e d i t to Frigitemp Corp., a c l i e n t of
  • based upon a l l e g e d l y f a l s e and misleading
  • Dworman v. Lee, 8 3 A.D.
  • a c t i o n, t w o of them sounding i n f r a u d and t h r e e sounding
  • cause of a c t i o n, t h e A p p e l l a t e D i v i s i o n, c i t i n g Ultramares
  • f i r m may Be l i a b l e i n negligence, a s d i s t i n g u i s h e d from
  • fraud, o n l y t o persons with whom it i s i n p r i v i t y.
  • i n essence alleges the same c a u s e s of a c t i o n as were d i s missed by t h e A p p e
  • by the d o c t r i n e of res j u d i c a t a.
  • t h e d e f e c t of th.e earlier p l e a d i n g, and t h e prior d i s m i s s a l
  • i s t h e r e f o r e n o t a bar t o t h e p r e s e n t a c t i o n.
  • dismiss the first cause of action, sounding in fraud, as insufficient in law.
  • "While the allegations as to wrongdoing and fraud by defendant-appellant are for the most
  • The court held that if the quoted allegation were true the case may f a l l within the rule
  • Ernst, supra, which renders an accounting fimn liable t o persons not in p r i v i t y when
  • wiith allegations similar or far more inculpating than t h a t quoted.from the' Rich case,'
  • " ' Paragraph 70 alleges that "Andersen knew.
  • false and misleading i n t h a t, c o n t r a r y t o t h e r e p r e s e n t a t i o n t h e
  • a l l e g a t i o n s i n t h e complaint i n Rich v. Touche Ross & C o.

  • 4 . DEF MEMO SUP MTD

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    PLAINTIFFS
    CPLR
    COURT
    JUDGEMENT
    RES JUDICATA
    MERITS
    YORK
    FAILURE
    MOTION
    COMPLAINT
    DISMISS
    ALLEGATIONS
    FRAUD
    DEFENDANTS
    MEMORANDUM
    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
    NEGLIGENCE
    THRIFT CREDIT CORPORATION
    DISMISSAL PURSUANT
    APPELLATE DIVISION
    ROSS AFF
    CONCLUSORY ALLEGATION
    ALVIN DWORMAN
    BURTON
    KOFFMAN
    CONTRACT
    FRAUDULENT
    CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
    PLEADING
    
    SUPREMF:  COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
    COUNTY OF NEW YORK
    
    
    ALVIN DWORMAN, BURTON  I.  KOFFMAN  :
    and THRIFT CREDIT CORPORATION,
    
                            Plaintiffs,
    
              -against-
    
    ARTHUR  ANDERSEN  &  CO.,
    
                            Defendant.
    - - - - -  - - - - - - - - - - -  - x
    
                       DEFENDANT'S MEMORANDUM
                   IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS
    
    
                                     BREED,  ABBOTT &  MORGAN
                                     Citicorp Center
                                     153 East  53rd Street
                                     New York, New York  10022
                                     (212)  888-0800
    
                                                  -and-
    
                                     WILSON  &  McILVAINE
                                     135 South LaSalle Street
                                     Chicago,  Illinois  60603
                                     (312)  263-1212
                                     Attorneys for  Defendant
                                     Arthur Andersen &  Co.
    
    
    
                                 Table of Contents
    
    
    
          ARGUMENT.  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .         4
    
            I.  THE ACTION  IS BARRED
                BY RES  JUDICATA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
                A .   The  Judgment is Dworman I
                     is a Final Judgment . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
                *3.  Dworman I was Based on the
                     Same Cause of Action as the
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK
  • and THRIFT CREDIT CORPORATION,
  • IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS
  • The Judgment is Dworman I
  • was on the Merits.
  • CPLR 3211for failure
  • Relitigation of plaintiffs'
  • around the repleading provisions of CPLR 3211.
  • THE COMPLAINT FAILS TO STATE A CAUSE O F ACTION AND FAILS TO PLEAD THE CIRCUMSTANCES CONSTI-T
  • COUNTY OF NEW YORK - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - X ALVIN DWORMAN, BURTON I. KOFFMAN
  • - - - - - I Defendant Arthur Andersen & Co. submits t .his memorandum in support of i t s
  • C:ause of action may not be maintained because of res judicata,
  • plaintiffs commenced a prior action against Andersen and certain individual defendants which
  • That motion was denied by Justice Nathaniel T. Helman of this Court (Ross aff.,
  • By order dated June 8, 1982, the Court of Appeals unanimously affirmed "for the reasons
  • firm of certified public accountants which was engaged to eximine and report upon Frigitemp's
  • Andersen, one of t h e so-called "Big Eight," is a widely respected firm of certified public
  • (federal rule regarding specificity in pleading frau is designed to protect the reputations
  • Plaintiffs, having sought to tar that reputation f o r almost two years with allegations
  • Secor v. Sturgis, supra, stated that the same cause of action is pleaded where successive
  • Dismissal pursuant to CPLR 3 2 1 1
  • the heart of the complaint at bar lies in its many allegations of negligence against Andersen.
  • The only difference in the Complaint at bar is that plaintiffs now make a conclusory
  • A cause of action for fraud which merely "incorporates all the allegations" of a cause of

  • 5 . NOT DEPOSITION

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    THRIFT CREDIT CORPORATION
    ARTHUR
    SUPREME COURT
    COUNTY
    PRACTICE LAW
    DEFENDANT ARTHUR
    DEPOSITION
    ORAL EXARNINAT
    AGENT
    KNOWLEDGEBLE
    TRANSACTIONS
    COMMENCING
    MORGAN
    THEREAFTER
    ROBERT KASANOF
    ATTORNEYS
    
               SUPREME  COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW  YORK
               COUNTY  OF NEW YORK - - - - - - - - -  X
               - - - - - - - - -
               ALVIN  DWORMAN,  BURTON  I .   KOFFMAN                                Index No.  2595/83
               and THRIFT  CREDIT CORPORATION,
    
                                                   P l a i n t i f f s  ,
                                   - against-                                        NOTICE  O F  
                                                                                                    F I
               ARTHUR  ANDERSEN  &  CO.,
    
                                                   Defendant.
                                   - - - - - - - - - - - -  - x
          ,    -    -    e    -    -
    
    
    I  / S I R S
    W                              PLEASE  TAKE NOTICE  THAT,  pursuant  t o  A r t i c l e   3 1  of
    
               t h e   C i v i l   Practice  Law  and  Rules,  defendant Arthur A n d e r s e n
    
               &  Co.  ("Andersen") w i l l  take  t h e   deposition upon  oral exarnina-
    
               t i o n   of  p l a i n t i f f   THRIFT  CREDIT  CORPORATION,  by  i t s  agent most
    
               knowledgeble  w i t h   respect t o   t h e   transactions  and  events
    
               described  i n  the  C o m p l a i n t ,   commencing a t   1 O : O O   a.m.  on
    
               March 21,  1 9 8 4   a t   t h e   o f f i c e s   of  B r e e d ,   A b b o t t   & 
    
               153 East  53rd  Street, New York, New  Y o r k   10022,  and continu-
    
               ing from  day to day thereafter until completed.
    
               D a t e d :   New  Y o r k ,   New  York
                              February  13,  1984                   Yours, etc.
    
                                                                    BREED,  ABBQTT  &  MORGAN
                                                                    1 5 3   E a s t   53rd Street
                                                                    New Y o r k ,   New  York  1 0 0 2 
                                                                     ( 2 1 2 )   888 - 0800
    
                                                                               -and-
    
                                                                    WILSON  &  McILVAINE
                                                                    135 South  L a S a l l e   S t r e
                                                                    Chicago,  Illinois 60603
                                                                     ( 3 1 2 )   263- 1212
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK - - - - - - - - - X
  • ARTHUR ANDERSEN & CO.,
  • t h e C i v i l Practice Law and Rules, defendant Arthur A n d e r s e n
  • & Co. w i l l take t h e deposition upon oral exarninat i o n of p l a i n t i f f THRIFT
  • knowledgeble w i t h respect t o t h e transactions and events
  • described i n the C o m p l a i n t, commencing a t 1 O:
  • March 21, 1 9 8 4 a t t h e o f f i c e s of B r e e d, A b b o t t & Morgan,
  • 153 East 53rd Street, New York, New Y o r k 10022, and continuing from day to day thereafter
  • TO: ROBERT KASANOF, ATTORNEYS

  • 6 . STIPULATION

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    COURT
    COUNTY
    ALVIN DWORMAN
    BURTON
    KOFFMAN
    
           Ym          -*.
           -.-
    
    
    
     SUPREME  COURT  OF  THE  STATE  OF  NEW  YORK
     COUNTY  OF  NEW  YORK
    
    
    ALVIN  DWORMAN,  BURTON  I.  KOFFMAN
    and  THRIFT                         CREDIT  CORPORATION,                                           
     ------------                                                          -  -  -  -  h  -  -  -  x
    
                                                                                                       
                                                                      Plaintiffs,                      
                                                   -aqainst-                                           
      OF
    ARTHUR  ANDERSEN  &  CO.,                                                                          
                                                                                                       
                                                                      Defendant.                       
    ----------                                               ---------                                 
    
                                   IT  IS  HEREBY  STIPULATED                                          
    the  undersigned,                               the  attorneys                            of 
    Burton             I.  Koffman                   and  Thrift                      Credit           
    herein,                    and  Arthur             Andersen                     &  Co.,  defendant 
    the  above                     entitled            action                be,  and  the  same 
    
    continued                     and  dismissed,                          with         prejudice      
    This  stipulation                              may  be  filed                      without         
    
    the  Clerk                    of  the  Court.
    
    Dated:                     New  York,            New  York
                               July              ,  1984
                                        ii.3
    
    
    
    
                                                                                    767  Third         
                                                                               New  York,              
                                                                                    (212)          
                                ,  .
                                 c                                             BREED,  ABBOTT  &'M
                                 :`"C                                                                  
           F  I  -.  `I
                                          d  3 ;                                            \
                      JUL 148-1984                                             BY                 qw   
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • -.-SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK
  • ALVIN DWORMAN, BURTON I. KOFFMAN

  • 7 . NTC OF APPEAL

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    SUPREME COURT
    COUNTY
    APPEALS
    CLERK
    COMPLAINT
    KOFFMAN
    CREDIT CORPORATION
    ARTHUR
    HEREBY APPEALS
    APPELLATE DIVISION
    FIRST DEPARTMENT
    SPECIAL TERM
    HONORABLE ARNOLD
    FRAIMAN
    MOTION
    JUDGMENT DISMISSING
    RES JUDICATA
    CPLR
    COMPLAINT FAILS
    THEREOF
    KASANOF
    SCHWARTZ
    
          SUPREME  COURT  OF THE  STATE OF NEW YORK
          COUNTY OF NEW YORK
    
          _ -    _ -    _ -    -    -    -    l    -    -    -    -    -    -         - X
    
          ALVIN DWORMAN,  BURTON I.                                                           Index No.
          KOFFMAN and T H R I F T ,
          CREDIT CORPORATION,
    
                                                   Plaintiffs,                                NOTICE OF
    
                                    - anainnt-                                                         
                                         -=---.--
          ARTHUR .ANDERSEN &  CO.,
    I                                              Defendant.                                          
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
          - - - - - -                                                                                  
                                              -  - - - - - - - - -                                     
                                                                                      - X
    
    
    
          S I R S :
                                                                                                       
                                    PLEASE TAKE  NOTICE that Arthur Andersen &  Co.
          ("Andersen") hereby appeals to the Appellate Division Of the
    
          Supreme Court of the State of New York,  First Department, from
          an order made in this action in the Supreme C o u r t :   Of the State
    
          of New York,  County of New York,  Special Term,  Part  I,  by  the
    ll Honorable Arnold G.  Fraiman, filed in the office of the Clerk
    ll Andersen's motion for judgment dismissing the complaint under
          L ~ U X   J L I  1 \ a 1 ( 3 )
                                                        on tne ground that the cause of action may not
          be maintained because of res  judicata, under CPLR  3 2 1 1 ( a ) ( 7 )   on
          the ground that t h e   complaint fails to state a cause of ac-
    
                                                                            116(b) on the ground that
    
    
    
    
    
    (I
    
    
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK
  • KOFFMAN and T H R I F T,
  • CREDIT CORPORATION,
  • ARTHUR .ANDERSEN & CO.,
  • hereby appeals to the Appellate Division Of the
  • Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department, from an order made in this action
  • be maintained because of res judicata, under CPLR 3 2 1 1 on the ground that t h e complaint
  • well as the whole thereof.
  • THE CLERK OF THE COUNTY
  • KASANOF & SCHWARTZ

  • 8 . NOT DEOSITION

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    COURT
    COUNTY
    CREDIT CORPORATION
    DEPOSITION
    ORAL EXAMINAT
    BURTON
    MORGAN
    THEREAFTER
    ROBERT KASANOF
    ATTORNEYS
    
    .  .  ,-
    ,*.                                                                                                
    
    
            SUPREME  COURT  OF  THE  STATE  O F   NEW  YORK
            COUNTY OF  NEW  YORK
    
            ALVIN  DWORMAN,  BURTON  I .   KOFFMAN                                       Index  N o .  
            and  T H R I F T   CREDIT  CORPORATION,
    
                                                P l a i n t i f f s ,
    
                             - against-                                                 NOTICE  O F   D
    
            ARTHUR  ANDERSEN  &  CO.,
    
                                                D e f e n d a n t .
    
    
            S I R S :
    
    
    
    
            Sr  CO.  ( " A n d e r s e n " )   w i l l   take  t h e   deposition  upon  oral examina-
    
            t i o n   of  p l a i n t i f f   BURTON  I.  KOFFMAN,commencing  a t   1O:OO  a.m.
    
            on March  2 0 ,   1 9 8 4   a t   t h e   o f f i c e s   of  B r e e d ,   A b b o t t   &
    
            153  E a s t   53rd  Street,  New  Y o r k ,   New  York 1 0 0 2 2 ,   and  continu-
    
            ing f r o m   day  t o   day  thereafter  u n t i l   c o m p l e t e d .
    
            D a t e d :   New  Y o r k ,   New  Y o r k
                         February  13,  1 9 8 3
                                                                   Y o u r s ,   etc.
    
                                                                   BREED,. ABBOTT  &  MORGAN
                                                                   153 East  53rd  Street
                                                                   New  Y o r k ,   New  Y o r k   1 0
                                                                   ( 2 1 2 )   888- 0800
    
                                                                                 -and-
    
                                                                   WILSON  &  McILVAINE
                                                                   135  South  LaSalle  Street
                                                                   C h i c a g o ,   I l l i n o i s  
                                                                   ( 3 1 2 )   263- 1212
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • ,-SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE O F NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK
  • and T H R I F T CREDIT CORPORATION,
  • Sr CO. w i l l take t h e deposition upon oral examinat i o n of p l a i n t i f f BURTON I.
  • on March 2 0, 1 9 8 4 a t t h e o f f i c e s of B r e e d, A b b o t t & Morgan,
  • 153 E a s t 53rd Street, New Y o r k, New York 1 0 0 2 2, and continuing f r o m day t o day
  • TO: ROBERT KASANOF, ATTORNEYS

  • 9 . MOTION TO DISMISS

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    FRAUD
    DISMISS
    ACCOUNTING
    COURT
    NEGLIGENCE
    DEFENDANT
    SOUNDING
    ULTRAMARES
    ALLEGES
    STREET TRUST
    DWORMAN
    MISLEADING
    APPELLATE DIVISION
    LEE
    TOUCHE
    PLEADING
    SUPRA
    CPLR
    BAR
    ASSERTING
    CORRECTS
    ROSS
    DISCLOSE
    CONTRACTS
    FRIGITEMP
    SPECIAL TERM
    MOTION
    FAILURE
    DISTINCTIONS
    
    SUPREME  COURT  : NEW  YORK COUNTY
    SPECIAL  TERM  : PART  I
    
    ALVIN  DWORMAN,  BURTON  I.  KOFFMAN
    and  THRIFT  C R E D I T   CORPORATION,
    
                                      P l a i n t i f f s ,
                   - against-                                                           I
                                                                       Motion  No  2 9   of
    ARTHUR  ANDERSEN  &  Co.,                                          March  11,  1983
    
    
    
    
    FRAIMAN,  J. :
    
    
    
    
    
    A r t h u r   Andersen,  based  upon a l l e g e d l y   false and misleading
                                                                                      , :
    
    
    
    
    
     by defendant.
    
                    T h i s   is t h e   second action brought  by  t h e s e
     p l a i n t i f f s   a g a i n s t   defendant.  The  f i r s t   a c t i o n   was dis-
    
    
    
          missed  by the Appellate Division.  D w o r m a n   v.  Lee,  8 3   A.D.
    
          2d  507  (1st Dept.  19811, aff'd,  56 N.Y.2d  816  ( 1 9 8 2 ) .   The
          complaint i n   t h e   original a c t i o n   contained  'five causes  of
    
          action,  two  of them sounding  i n   fraud  and three  sounding
          i n   negligence.  In reversing a  d e n i a l   by Special  Term of
    
          a motion t o  dismiss  t h e   complaint  f o r   failure t o   s t a t e   a
    
          cause of a c t i o n ,   the Appellate  Division, citing Ultramares
    
          Corp.  v.  Touche,  255  N.Y.  170  (1931), h e l d   that an accountinq
    
          f i r m  may  be  l i a b l e   in negligence, a s   distinguished  from
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • SUPREME COURT: NEW YORK COUNTY SPECIAL TERM: PART I
  • ALVIN DWORMAN, BURTON I. KOFFMAN
  • A r t h u r Andersen, based upon a l l e g e d l y false and misleading
  • T h i s is t h e second action brought by t h e s e p l a i n t i f f s a g a i n s t
  • The f i r s t a c t i o n was dismissed by the Appellate Division.
  • D w o r m a n v. Lee,
  • The complaint i n t h e original a c t i o n contained 'five causes of
  • two of them sounding i n fraud and three sounding i n negligence.
  • a motion t o dismiss t h e complaint f o r failure t o s t a t e a
  • Corp. v. Touche, 255 N.Y. 170, h e l d that an accountinq
  • fraud.'* Dworman v. Lee, supra at 507.
  • I n Ultramares, the court had held t h a t although accountants could n o t
  • Defendant contends that despite superficial distinctions in the t w o pleadings,
  • in essence alleges the same causes of action as were dismissed by the Appellate Division,
  • CPLR 3211f o r failure to s t a t e a c a u s e of action.
  • the dismissal is not a bar to a new complaint asserting the same claim if the new cause of
  • The fraud i n s u f f i c i e n t d e t a i l t o conply w i t h CPLR 3016.
  • the defect of t h e e a r l i e r pleading, and the p r i o r dismissal
  • is therefore n o t a bar t o the present action.
  • t h e present complalnt is also adequate to survive a motion to
  • d i s m i s s based upon Ultr'amar.es o r State Street Trust.
  • I n s t a n t case, involved an action against a n accounting firm by a t h i r d p a r t y
  • long- term contracts between Frigitemp's Marine Group and
  • on which Frigitemp recognized as net
  • Nevertheless, Andersen did not disclose the change in accounting p o l i c y, t h e e f f e c
  • allegati.ons!i$ the complaiflt in Rich v. Touche Ross & Co.

  • 10 . NOT DEPOSITION

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    SUPREME COURT
    COUNTY
    CREDIT CORPORATION
    PURSUANT
    PRACTICE LAW
    DEFENDANT
    EXAMINAT
    ALVIN DWORMAN
    COMMENCING
    MORGAN
    CONTINUI
    THEREAFTER
    ROBERT KASANOF
    ATTORNEYS
    
          SUPREME COURT  OF  THE  STATE  O F   NEW  YORK
          COUNTY  OF  NEW  YORK
    
          ALVIN  DWORMAN,  BURTON  I .   KOFFMAN                                   Index  N o .   2 5 9
          and T H R I F T   CREDIT  CORPORATION,
    
                                             P l a i n t i f f s ,
    
                          - against-                                              NOTICE  O F   D E P O
    
          ARTHUR  ANDERSEN  &  CO.,
    
                                             D e f e n d a n t .
    
    
    
    
                          PLEASE  TAKE  NOTICE  THAT, pursuant  t o   A d e l e  31  of
    
          t h e   C i v i l  Practice  Law and  R u l e s ,   defendant  A r t h u r   A n d e r s e n
    
          &  Co.  ( " A n d e r s e n " )   w i l l   take  t h e   d e p o s i t i o n   upon  o r a l
    
          t i o n   of  p l a i n t i f f   ALVIN  DWORMAN,  commencing a t   1O:OO  a.m.  on
    
          March  1 9 ,   1 9 8 4   a t  t h e   o f f i c e s   of  Breed,  A b b o t t   &  Morgan,
    
          153 E a s t   53rd  Street,  New  Y o r k ,   New  Y o r k   1 0 0 2 2 ,   and continu-
    
          i n g   from  day t o  day thereafter  u n t i l   completed.
    
          Dated:  New  York,  New  York
                       February  13,  1983
                                                                Y o u r s ,   etc.
    
                                                                 BREED,  ABBOTT  &  MORGAN
                                                                 153 East  53rd  Street
                                                                New  Y o r k ,   New  Y o r k   1 0 0 2
                                                                 (212) 888- 0800
    
                                                                          -and-
    
                                                                WILSON  &  McILVAINE
                                                                 135  South L a S a l l e   Street
                                                                 Chicago,  Illinois 6 0 6 0 3
                                                                 ( 3 1 2 )   263- 1212
    
          TO:     ROBERT  KASANOF,  ATTORNEYS
                  767  T h i r d   A v e n u e
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE O F NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK
  • and T H R I F T CREDIT CORPORATION,
  • pursuant t o A d e l e 31 of
  • t h e C i v i l Practice Law and R u l e s, defendant A r t h u r A n d e r s e n
  • & Co. w i l l take t h e d e p o s i t i o n upon o r a l examinat i o n of p l a i n t i f f
  • March 1 9, 1 9 8 4 a t t h e o f f i c e s of Breed, A b b o t t & Morgan,
  • 153 E a s t 53rd Street, New Y o r k, New Y o r k 1 0 0 2 2, and continui n g from day t o
  • TO: ROBERT KASANOF, ATTORNEYS

  • 11 . COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    DEFENDANTS
    FRIGITEMP
    CERTIFICATION
    CREDIT
    RISK
    ACCOUNTING
    AMOUNT
    SUFFER
    OBLIGATIONS
    PROPER
    AUDIT
    RELIANCE
    YORK
    PREPARATION
    ACT
    GUARANTORS
    INDEMNITORS
    INJURY
    DAMAGES
    PARAGRAPHS
    FOREGOING
    ACCRUE
    DWORMAN
    CORPORATIONS
    RECEIVABLES
    PAID
    REPRESENTATIONS
    DEMAND NOTES
    RESOURCES
    
    SUPREME  COURT OF  THE  STATE  OF  NEW  YORK
    COUNTY  OF  NEW YORK
    
    
    ALVIN  DWORMAN, BURTON  I.  KOFFMAN
    and  THRIFT  CREDIT  CORPORATION,
                                            Plaintiffs,                                      COMPLAINT
                               -against-
    ARTHUR  ANDE,RSEN &  CO.,  GERALD  LEE,
    MERVYN  SILVER  and  JOSEPH  W.  HEILBRUN,                                         :
                                            Defendants.            '                   :
    ""'---'~"""-"---------------------x
    
                       The  plaintiffs,                by  their           attorneys,
    Robert  Kasanof  &  Bart  M.  Schwartz,                                allege:
        Allegations             Relevant          To  All  Causes  Of  Action
                       1.       The  plaintiff,                 Alvin       Dworman,  is
    a  resident          of  the  City,              County  and  State  of  New
    York.
                       2,       The  plaintiff,                 Burton  I.  Koffman, -
    is  a  resident            of  the  City  of  Binghamton,                           County
    of  Broome  in  the  State  of  New  York.
                       3.       The  plaintiff,                 Thrift        Credit          Cor-
    poration          ("Thrift*'),            is  a  corporation               organized  I.
    and  existing             under  the  laws  of  the  State  of  New
    York.        The  plaintiff              Koffman  is  an  officer,
    director         and  principal              shareholder               of  Thrift.
                       4.       Frigitemp            Corp.        ("Frigitemp")
    is  a  corporation                 organized            and  existing              under  the
    laws  of  the  State  of  New  York,  with  offices                                       in
    
    
    
                                     -:7      .-
                  ;
    -.     ;7                 -c
    ?                   L
    
                  `1  -,
     $
    
    
    
    
    
                                                     the  City,        County  and  State  of  New 
                                                                       5.          On  or  about  March
                                                     gitemp  filed             a  petition            
                                                     suant  to  Chapter  XI  of  the  Bankruptcy       
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK
  • ALVIN DWORMAN, BURTON I. KOFFMAN
  • and THRIFT CREDIT CORPORATION,
  • cer of Frigitemp.
  • by the defendants.
  • receivables.
  • each and every allegation contained in paragraphs
  • Defendants did so knowj-no of the falsity of those representations.
  • In reliance on the financial Statements of Frigitemp
  • plaintiffs agreed to act and continue
  • of the foregoing, plaintiffs have suffered
  • tiffs have assumed a risk
  • failure to audit Frigi--temp properly,
  • may suffer a pecuniary
  • injury in an exact amount yet to be determined,
  • Dworman caused appraximately $250,000 to be paid out or to be provided
  • continue to be indemnitors and guarantors
  • on obligations,
  • on the demand notes dated on or about October 14,
  • and Andersen's certification
  • of them and damages continue to accrue.
  • in the preparation and certification
  • that it has special resources of size,
  • in auditing publicly held corporations
  • by accounting firms which do not make representations
  •    |