LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

ALBERT LEWIS et al v AVICI SYSTEMS, INC., MORGAN STANLEY & CO. INC, SURYA R. PANDITI and PAUL F. B Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: MWVASI174925, Plaintiff: ALBERT LEWIS et al, State: NY New York, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>MWVASI174925, Act, Securities, District, Exchange Act, Allege, Prospectus, Complaint, Registration Statement, Offering, Avici, Materials, Action Pursuant, Commission, Interstate, Misconduct, Jurisdiction, Matter, Promulgated Thereunder, Venue, Proper, Connection, Instrumentalities, Interstate Commerce, Mails, Interstate Telephone Communications, Facilities , ContentID: 120243562

Case Documents
1 2000-07-24 COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 108596
2 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 1 document , 2 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . COMPLAINT

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
SECURITIES
DEFENDANTS
DISTRICT
EXCHANGE ACT
ALLEGE
PROSPECTUS
PLAINTIFFS
COMPLAINT
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
OFFERING
AVICI
MATERIALS
ACTION PURSUANT
COURT
COMMISSION
INTERSTATE
MISCONDUCT
JURISDICTION
MATTER
PROMULGATED THEREUNDER
VENUE
PROPER
BUSINESS
CONNECTION
INSTRUMENTALITIES
INTERSTATE COMMERCE
MAILS
INTERSTATE TELEPHONE COMMUNICATIONS
FACILITIES
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

ALBERT LEWIS and ___________, on behalf of                X
themselves and all others similarly situated,             :: Index No.
                                  Plaintiffs,             :: CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
                                                                    FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE
                          vs.                             :: FEDERAL SECURITIES
                                                                    LAWS
AVICI SYSTEMS, Inc., MORGAN STANLEY &                     :
CO. INCORPORATED, SURYA R. PANDITI and                    :
PAUL F. BRAUNEIS,                                         ::
                                  Defendants.             :::::X
       Plaintiffs, by their undersigned attorneys, individually and on behalf of the Class

described below, upon information and belief, based upon, inter alia, the investigation of counsel,

which includes, among other things, a review of public announcements made by defendants,

Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") filings made by defendants, and press releases,

and media reports, except as to the paragraph applicable to the named plaintiffs which is alleged

upon personal knowledge, bring this Complaint (the "Complaint") against defendants named

herein, and allege as follows:

                                       SUMMARY OF ACTION

       1.      This is a securities class action alleging that the Registration Statement filed with

the SEC on July 24, 2000 and the Prospectus filed with the SEC on or about July 28, 2000, for

the issuance and initial public offering of 7 million shares of Avici Systems Inc. ("Avici" or the



"Company") common stock (the "Offering"), contained material misrepresentations and/or

omissions.  The Registration Statement and Prospectus are referred to herein collectively as the

"Prospectus."  Defendants are Avici, two members of its senior management team, who were

responsible for the materially false and misleading statements made in the Prospectus, and one of

the  underwriters of Avici's Offering, which engaged in a pattern of conduct to surreptitiously

extract inflated commissions greater than those disclosed in the Offering materials, among other

SNIPPETS:
  • UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
  • Plaintiffs, by their undersigned attorneys, individually and on behalf of the Class
  • Securities and Exchange Commission filings made by defendants, and press releases,
  • bring this Complaint against defendants named
  • herein, and allege as follows:
  • the issuance and initial public offering of 7 million shares of Avici Systems Inc. ("Avici"
  • The Registration Statement and Prospectus are referred to herein collectively as the
  • extract inflated commissions greater than those disclosed in the Offering materials,
  • acts of misconduct.
  • This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action pursuant to § 27
  • of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
  • amended and 78t), and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder (17 C.F.R.
  • Venue is proper in this District as defendants
  • conduct business in this District and many of the wrongful acts alleged herein took place or
  • In connection with the acts alleged in this complaint, defendants, directly or
  • indirectly, used the means and instrumentalities of interstate commerce, including, but not
  • limited to, the mails, interstate telephone communications and the facilities of the national
  •    |