LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

CENTURY MORTGAGE CO INC v KPMG PEAT MARWICK Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: CMVK98364, CourtCode: SM, CourtName: RHODE ISLAND SUPREME COURT, Plaintiff: CENTURY MORTGAGE CO INC, State: RI Rhode Island, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>CMVK98364, Kpmg, Peat Marwick, Macdonald, Kpmg Peat Marwick, Rhode Island, Cccs, Providence, Daniel, Discovery, Interrogatories, Interrogatory, Accounting, Marwick, Business Experience, David, Schmitt, Peat, Response, Employment, Educational Backgrounds, Paragraph, Averments, Transaction, Residence, Complaint, Employees, Ernst, Engagement, Supp, Nature, Acquisition, Hereinafter, Mortgage, President, Request, Dismiss, Negligence, Information Sufficient, Matter, Arthur Macdonald, Responding, Birth , ContentID: 120243506

Case Documents
1 1996-02-06 DOCKET
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 107793
1 pages
PDF
2 1995-06-30 SUP RESP OF DEF TO INTER
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 107805
3 pages
PDF
3 1995-02-01 RESP TO PLF MOT TO COMPEL
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 107803
2 pages
PDF
4 1995-01-01 MEM FOR PLF TO COMPEL ANS
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 107794
2 pages
PDF
5 1994-11-28 RESPOF DEFTO INTER
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 107804
3 pages
PDF
6 1994-11-28 RESP OF DEF TO INTEROG
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 107802
2 pages
PDF
7 1994-08-30 PLF INTER ADDRESSEDTO DEF
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 107798
2 pages
PDF
8 1994-08-17 DEF REPL TO PLF OP TO DIS
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 107792
2 pages
PDF
9 1994-07-29 PLF MEM IN OPP TO DISMISS
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 107799
1 pages
PDF
10 1994-06-06 PLF ANS TO DEFS 1ST INTER
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 107797
2 pages
PDF
11 1994-06-06 PLF ANS TO DEFS 1ST INTER
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 107796
2 pages
PDF
12 1994-06-06 DEF CENTMORT ANS TO INTER
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 107791
2 pages
PDF
13 1994-03-16 DEF 1ST SET OF INTEROG
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 107790
3 pages
PDF
14 1994-03-16 DEF 1ST REQ FOR PROD
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 107789
3 pages
PDF
15 1994-03-07 PLF REQ FOR PROD OF DOCS
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 107800
2 pages
PDF
16 1994-03-01 RESP OF DEF KPMGPM
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 107801
3 pages
PDF
17 1994-01-25 MEM TO DISMISS THE COMPL
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 107795
3 pages
PDF
18 1993-12-29 COMLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 107788
2 pages
PDF
19 1993-12-29 CASE COVERSHEET
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 107787
4 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 19 documents , 44 pages
Price: $ 109.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . DOCKET

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
No key words
found in document.
--------------
This indicates that
document is an image.
--------------
Images in PDF files
often contain text
readable by persons
but not by scanners.





SNIPPETS:

2 . SUP RESP OF DEF TO INTER

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
PROVIDENCE
KPMG PEAT MARWICK
DEFENDANT
MACDONALD
EMPLOYMENT
SUPPLEMENT
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
HEREINAFTER
IDENTI
RESPONSE
ARTHUR MACDONALD
DAVID
HENRY
KEIGWIN
DANIEL
SCHMITT
ERNST
BUSINESS
RESIDENCE
BALTIMORE
PARTNER
PEAT MARWICK LLP
CONSUMER CREDIT
LRELEVANT
NATURE
C-1
REASONABLE INQUIRY
KPMG RESERVES
AMEND
                         STATE OF M O D E  ISLAND                                                  
                         PROVIDENCE, SC.


                         CENTURY MORTGAGE CO., INC.,
                         ARTHUR MACDONALD, DAVID
                         MACDONALD and HENRY J.
                         KEIGWIN
                                                                 Plaintiffs

                                                          V.                                       

                         KPMG PEAT MARWICK, PEAT
                         MARWICK, MAIN & CO., DANIEL
                         F. SCHMITT and ERNST & YOUNG

                                                                 Defendants


                                                                                SUPPLEMENTAL 
                                                                  OF DEFENDANT KPMG  PEAT MARWICK 
                                                         \
                                                                                                   
 .     . 7
                                                                                                   
L,;


                                                    INTERROGATORY NO. 1. Identify the person
                         name, business and residence address, position with defendant, and length
                         defendant.

                                                    RESPONSE:  James M. Quigley, KPMG Peat Marwick

                         Baltimore, MD  21202-6199, Partner, employed since 1963.  The following
      -                  responses are based on both personal knowledge and on information gathered

                         KPMG Peat Marwick LLP.


.                                                   -
                                                                                  Identify all
                          defendant who were involved in providing professional services of any
                          Corporation (hereinafter, I'CCC'') for the period January 1, 1983 to and
            LQ  3989 (hereinafter, the 'lrelevant period").  For each such person identified,
            CJ-1         . . d J
                         &e  services provided and the period during which he or she provided the
            c,  ::::                        c f l
            c ~1. ",   t=
SNIPPETS:
  • PROVIDENCE, SC.
  • ARTHUR MACDONALD, DAVID
  • MACDONALD and HENRY J.
  • KEIGWIN
  • KPMG PEAT MARWICK, PEAT
  • MARWICK, MAIN & CO., DANIEL
  • F. SCHMITT and ERNST & YOUNG
  • name, business and residence address, position with defendant, and length of employment by the
  • Baltimore, MD 21202-6199, Partner, employed since 1963.
  • KPMG Peat Marwick LLP.
  • defendant who were involved in providing professional services of any kind to Consumer Credit
  • LQ 3989 (hereinafter, the 'lrelevant period").
  • describe the nature of
  • -'7 r-, c-1
  • After reasonable inquiry, KPMG has been able to identi@ the following
  • KPMG reserves the right to supplement or to amend this response if more information becomes

  • 3 . RESP TO PLF MOT TO COMPEL

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    MARWICK
    PLAINTIFFS
    DEFENDANTS
    CLIENT
    PROVIDENCE
    MACDONALD
    KPMG PEAT MARWICK
    RESPONSE
    INVESTMENT
    CCCS
    BLACKSTONE
    VALLEY
    ACCOUNTING
    FIRM
    RHODE ISLAND
    DEPOSIT INDEMNITY CORPORATION
    EARLIER1
    AUDIT WORK
    DISCLOSE CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
    MARYLAND
    PARTY
    SUPPORT
    SPECULATIVE CLAIM
    NON-PARTY CLIENT
    SELL CCCS
    FACTUAL BASIS
    ALLEGATION
    HARASS PEAT
    EMBARRASS
    
    STATE  OF RHODE ISLAND                                               SUPERIOR COURT
    
    PROVIDENCE, Sc.
    
    
    
    CENTURY  MORTGAGE CO.,  INC.,
    ARTHUR MACDONALD, DAVID
    MACDONALD and HENRY J.
    KEIGWIN
                        Plaintiffs
    
                V.                           :     PC 9 3 - 7 0 8 9
    
    KPMG PEAT MARWICK, PEAT
    MARWICK, MAIN &  CO.,  DANIEL
    F. SCHMITT and ERNST  &  YOUNG
    
                        Defendants
    
    
                       RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS'  MOTION TO COMPEL
    
         Plaintiffs allege that KPMG  Peat Marwick, LLP, its
    
    predecessor and  one of its partners  (collectively, 'Peat
    
    Marwick") are responsible for the loss of their investment in
    
    Commercial Credit Consumer Services, Inc. ("CCCS,')  .
    
         In 1988, plaintiffs purchased CCCS.  They  changed its name
    
    to Blackstone Valley Loan and Investment Company ("Blackstone
    
    Valley") and continued to operate it-  as a Rhode Island Share and
    
    Deposit Indemnity Corporation ("R1SDIC")-insured financial
    
    institution until it was closed  in January 1991.  Plaintiffs
    
    
    
    claim that because Peat Marwick audited RISDIC seven (7) earlier1
    
    the accounting firm should produce records of its audit work
    
    presumably to show  that in 1981 defendants knew that RISDIC was
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • PROVIDENCE, Sc.
  • CENTURY MORTGAGE CO., INC., ARTHUR MACDONALD, DAVID
  • KPMG PEAT MARWICK, PEAT MARWICK, MAIN & CO., DANIEL
  • RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO COMPEL
  • In 1988, plaintiffs purchased CCCS.
  • to Blackstone Valley Loan and Investment Company ("Blackstone
  • Valley") and continued to operate it- as a Rhode Island Share and
  • Deposit Indemnity Corporation -insured financial
  • claim that because Peat Marwick audited RISDIC seven earlier1
  • the accounting firm should produce records of its audit work
  • presumably to show that in 1981 defendants knew that RISDIC was
  • Marwick should disclose confidential information concerning
  • accounting services provided to a Peat Marwick client in Maryland
  • who is not a party in this action.
  • information apparently to support their speculative claim that
  • defendants advised the non-party client to sell CCCS because of
  • Besides having no factual basis for the
  • allegation, the claim appears to be made not only to harass Peat
  • Marwick but also to embarrass and annoy another client of the

  • 4 . MEM FOR PLF TO COMPEL ANS

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    KPMG
    DEFENDANTS
    PEAT MARWICK
    INTERROGATORIES
    MORTGAGE
    ACCOUNTING
    TRANSACTION
    PROVIDENCE
    MACDONALD
    BANK
    RHODE ISLAND
    COMMERCIAL CREDIT
    HEREINAFTER
    AUDITOR
    ADVICE
    DILIGENCE
    COMMERCIAL CREDIT CONSUMER
    CCCS
    INDEMNITY CORPORATION
    PARTNER
    INTERNATIONAL ACCOUNTING FIRM
    CONNECTION
    CONTEMPLATED TRANSACTION
    NATURE
    DESIRABILITY
    ACQUISITION
    PARENT COMPANY
    LLCCC
    PROPOSED TRANSACTION
    
    STATE OF RHODE  ISLAND                            SUPERIOR COURT
    PROVIDENCE, SC.
    
    
    CENTURY MORTGAGE CO.,  INC.,
    ARTHUR MACDONALD,
    DAVID MACDONALD and
    HENRY J.  KEIGWIN
    vs .
    
    KPMG PEAT MARWICK,
    PEAT MARWICK, MAIN &  CO,,
    DANIEL F.  SCHMITT and
    ERNST &  YOUNG
    
    
    
                            MEMOFUNDUM  IN SUPPORT OF
             PLAINTIFFS'  MOTION TO COMPEL ANSWERS  TO INTERROGATORIES
    
             The plaintiffs move for an order compelling the defendants
    to provide answers to interrogatories.
             This action arises out of the plaintiffs' claim that the
    defendants breached their duty of care in the provision of
    accounting and professional consulting services.  The defendants  b ,. ..
                                                                                                      
    have refused                                                                                      
                                                                                                      
                     t o  provide answers to most  of the interrogatories                             
                                                                                                      
                                                                              I--                     
                                                                                                       
                                                                                        .  ...         
                                                                              3.                       
    served by plaintiff David MacDonald, and have objected even to  8,  .                              
                                                                                                      
                                                                                     '  ,  ? ~ - ,     
                                                                                              , .      
                                                                                                      
    the interrogatories to which they provided some response, based  - ,
                                                                               ,*.             -.      
                                                                              2                 .
                                                                               ;  -. ." <:             
                                                                               , ,                     
    on their assertion that they enjoy some sort of privilege to                                       
                                                                                !.      ,             
                                                                                                       
                                                                               -'       ,              
                                                                               L.,  T' .T  -3
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • PROVIDENCE, SC.
  • CENTURY MORTGAGE CO., INC., ARTHUR MACDONALD,
  • KPMG PEAT MARWICK, PEAT MARWICK, MAIN & CO,,
  • The plaintiffs move for an order compelling the defendants to provide answers to
  • This action arises out of the plaintiffs' claim that the defendants breached their duty of
  • In 1988, the plaintiffs became aware of the opportunity to acquire a bank located in Rhode
  • CCCS was a state chartered financial institution, insured by Rhode Island Depositor's
  • At the time, Century's auditor and accountant was defendant Peat Marwick, Main & Co., a
  • The plaintiffs sought the advice of KPMG in connection with their contemplated transaction.
  • They requested KPMG's advice regarding the nature and extent of any "due diligence"
  • KPMG informed the plaintiffs that it would be well situated to advise on the transaction,
  • KPMG reviewed the proposed transaction, and advised the plaintiffs on all aspects of it.

  • 5 . RESPOF DEFTO INTER

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    DISCOVERY
    INTERROGATORY
    EMPLOYEES
    PROVIDENCE
    DEFENDANTS OBJECT
    ADMISSIBLE EVIDENCE
    RESPONSE
    PLAINTIFFS
    AGENTS
    SALE
    DISPOSITION
    BANKS
    FLEET
    KENNEDY PLAZA
    PARTNERS
    PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
    RELEVANT PERIOD
    IRRELEVANT ANT
    OFFICERS
    CONSULTANTS
    DEFENDANT DEALT
    CONNECTION
    
                                                      STATE OF RHODE ISLAND                            
    
                                                      PROVIDENCE , SC .
    
    
                                                      CENTURY MORTGAGE CO. ,  INC. ,
                                                      AIiTHUR  MACDONALD, DAVID
                                                      MACDONALD and HENRY J.
                                                      KEIGWIN
                                                                                      Plaintiffs
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
    
    
    
    
                                                                             V.                        
    
                                                      KPMG PEAT MARWICK,  PEAT
                                                      MARWICK, MAIN &  CO. , DANIEL
                                                      F. SCHMITT and ERNST &  YOUNG
    
                                                                                      Defendants
    
    
    
    
    
                   - .                          ,      .                INTERROGATORY NO. 1.  Identify
              ,           -                    ---interrogatories, giving name, business and residence
             ..
             -:: ,  ,-.@sition  with defendant, and length of employment by the
             -..
    .                                    .            d'qfendant .
                   -I
    
    
                                                       -- ,
                                                       -
    - _
    i
     ..x                                                      , .       RESPONSE:      Daniel F.
    . .                                                           .
                                               '             ,--,
                                         . ,
                               -                     ,
                               : . ,   600 Fleet Center, 50 Kennedy Plaza, Providence, RI  0 2 9 0 3 ;
    
                                                       residence: 36 Mallard Cove Way, Barrington, RI
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • , 600 Fleet Center, 50 Kennedy Plaza, Providence, RI 0 2 9 0 3;
  • RESPONSE: Defendants object to this interrogatory on the
  • lead to the discovery of admissible evidence and any information
  • proprietary and not otherwise subject to discovery by plaintiffs.
  • Identify all partners, employees, and other agents of this defendant who were involved in
  • grounds that it is irrelevant ant 3 is not reasonably calculate(
  • Identify all officers, employees, consultants, or other agents of CCC with whom this

  • 6 . RESP OF DEF TO INTEROG

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    INTERROGATORY
    EMPLOYEES
    KPMG PEAT MARWICK
    RESPONSE
    DISCOVERY
    MACDONALD
    PARTNERS
    AGENTS
    DEFENDANTS OBJECT
    PROVIDENCE
    DAVID
    DANIEL
    SCHMITT
    RESIDENCE
    PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
    HEREINAFTER
    ADMISSIBLE EVIDENCE
    PLAINTIFFS
    SALE
    DISPOSITION
    BANKS
    BARRINGTON
    CONSUMER CREDIT CORPORATION
    LLCCCII
    NATURE
    OFFICERS
    CONSULTANTS
    DEFENDANT DEALT
    CONNECTION
    
          STATE OF RHODE ISLAND                              SUPERIOR COURT
    
          PROVIDENCE , SC .
    
    
          CENTURY MORTGAGE CO., INC.,
          ARTHUR  MACDONALD, DAVID
          MACDONALD and  HENRY  J.
          KEIGWIN
                                 Plaintiffs
    
                      V .                             :  PC 9 3 - 7 0 8 9
    
          KPMG  PEAT MARWICK, PEAT
          MARWICK, MAIN &  CO., DANIEL
          F. SCHMITT and ERNST &  YOUNG
    
                                 Defendants
    
    
                               RESPONSE OF DEFENDANT KPMG PEAT MARWICK TO
                        INTERROGATORIES PROPOUNDED BY DAVID MACDONALD
    
    
    .         -Identify the person answering these
          interrogatories, giving name, business and residence address,
          position with defendant, and  length of employment by the
          defendant.
    
              RESPONSE:  Daniel F. Schmitt, Partner, KPMG Peat Marwick LLP,
    
          600 Fleet Center, 5 0   Kennedy Plaza, Providence, RI  02903;
    
          residence: 36  Mallard Cove Way, Barrington, RI 0 2 8 0 6 .   Employed
    
          since 1973.
    
    
              INTERROGATORY  NQ.  2 .   Identify all partners, employees, and
          other agents of this defendant who were involved in providing
          professional services of any kind to Consumer Credit Corporation
          (hereinafter, llCCCII)  f o r   the period January 1, 1983 to and
          including January 31, 1989  (hereinafter, the "relevant period").
           For each such person identified, describe the nature of the
    
    
    
        RESPONSE:  Defendants object  to this interrogatory on the
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • CENTURY MORTGAGE CO., INC., ARTHUR MACDONALD, DAVID
  • KPMG PEAT MARWICK, PEAT MARWICK, MAIN & CO., DANIEL
  • F. SCHMITT and ERNST & YOUNG
  • RESPONSE OF DEFENDANT KPMG PEAT MARWICK TO
  • INTERROGATORIES PROPOUNDED BY DAVID MACDONALD
  • interrogatories, giving name, business and residence address, position with defendant, and
  • 600 Fleet Center, 5 0 Kennedy Plaza, Providence, RI 02903;
  • 36 Mallard Cove Way, Barrington, RI 0 2 8 0 6.
  • Identify all partners, employees, and other agents of this defendant who were involved in
  • describe the nature of the
  • Defendants object to this interrogatory on the
  • lead to the discovery of admissible evidence and any information
  • proprietary and not otherwise subject to discovery by plaintiffs.
  • Identify a l l partners, employees, and other agents of this defendant who were involved in
  • Identify all officers, employees, consultants, or other agents of CCC with whom this

  • 7 . PLF INTER ADDRESSEDTO DEF

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    ORAL COMMUNICATION
    ACT
    MACDONALD
    PEAT MARWICK
    ASSOCIATIONS
    DUTY
    REASONABLE EFFORT
    NATURE
    OBLIGATION
    AMEND
    SUBSEQUENT INFORMATION
    IDENTIFICATION SUFFICIENT
    DEPOSITION
    SERVE
    ATTENDANCE
    EXAMINATION
    LIMITATION
    OCCUPATION
    COMPANY AFFILIATION
    BUSINESS
    SUBSTANCE
    PARTICULARITY
    MATTER
    CUSTODIAN
    CORPORATIONS
    TRUSTS
    PARTNERSHIPS
    VENTURES
    CITIZENS GROUPS
    
                                                                                           .
                                                                                           .  .. -     
    
    
                                                                                     @
    
                            STATE OF RHODE  ISLAND                                   SUPERIOR COURT
                            PROVIDENCE, SC.
    
    
                            CENTURY MORTGAGE CO.,  INC.,
                            ARTHUR MACDONALD,
                            DAVID MACDONALD and
                            HENRY J.  KEIGWIN
                            vs .                                      :  C.A.  NO.  PC/93-7089
    
                            KPMG  PEAT MARWICK,
                            PEAT MARWICK, MAIN &  CO.,
                            DANIEL F.  SCHMITT and
                            ERNST &  YOUNG
    
    
    
    
    
    
                                                   PLAINTIFF DAVID MACDONALD'S  INTERROGATORIES
                                                                  ADDRESSED TO
                                                           DEFENDANT KPMG PEAT MARWICK
    
                                           Pursuant to Rule 33  of the Rhode Island Rules of Civil
                            Procedure, plaintiff propounds the following interrogatories to
    
                            be answered separately and fully under oath and in writing within
                             forty ( 4 0 )   days from the date of  service.
    
    
                                                          Definitions and Instructions
    
    
    
               I  1       1  *...
              'I  ).' ""! ';,.,c'
      ,:',.. ..
                              8..     "--a-rld
                                          all persons acting on your behalf or under your control.  If
                             .+,,,.J
                             --,
                             -4
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • ARTHUR MACDONALD,
  • KPMG PEAT MARWICK,
  • you do not have information to answer an interrogatory, you are under a duty to make a
  • These interrogatories are continuing in nature and you have a continuing obligation to
  • "Identify" a person shall mean to provide an identification sufficient to notice a deposition
  • "Identify" an oral communication shall mean to describe it by speaker, the personspoken to,
  • "Identifv" an act shall mean to describe the act, including the place, date, and time of i t
  • "Identify" a document shall mean to describe that document by date, author, address, general
  • "Person" shall mean and include natural persons, corporations, trusts, partnerships,

  • 8 . DEF REPL TO PLF OP TO DIS

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    DISMISS
    COMPLAINT
    NEGLIGENCE
    RHODE ISLAND
    MEMBERS
    ERNST
    MEMORANDUM
    MOTION
    LIMITED CLASS
    GENERAL INVESTING PUBLICV1
    NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION
    STANDARD
    MACDONALD
    DEFENDANT
    OPPOSITION
    FORESEEABILITY
    MEM
    LIABILITY
    EXTEND
    KRAUSE
    TTFORESEEABILITYTL STANDARD
    SETTLED LAW
    MODE ISLAND
    VAST MAJORITY
    RHODE ISLAND DEDOSITORS
    DEDOSITORS ECONOMIC PROTECTION
    YOUNQ
    ITHEREINAFTER IIDEPCO
    ARGUE
    
    STATE OF M O D E  ISLAND
    PROVIDENCE, SC .                                     SUPERIOR COURT
    
    CENTURY MORTGAGE CO.,  INC.,
    ARTHUR MACDONALD,
    DAVID MACDONALD and
    HENRY J. KEIGWIN                                     C . A .   No.  PC/93-7089
    
    V.
    
    KPMG PEAT MARWICK,
    PEAT MARWICK, MAIN &  CO. ,                                        ,/'
    DANIEL F.  SCHMITT and
    ERNST &  YOUNG
    
                                                            /'
                               DEFENDANT ERNST &  YOUNG'S
                       REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS' MEMORANDUM IN
                OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS THE COMPLAINT
                  Defendant E r n s t   &  Young (l1E&YI 1)  submits t h i s   reply
    memorandum in further support of its motion to dismiss the
    complaint.
                                          POINT I
                   THE COMPLAINT SHOULD BE DISMISSED BECAUSE
                    PLAINTIFFS WERE NOT MEMBERS  OF  A  LIMITED
                   GROUP..WHOSE  RELIANCE WAS ACTUALLY FORESEEN
    
    A .      Plaintiffs Were Not
             Members of A  Limited Class
                  plaintiffs never dispute that, to state a claim
    against  E&Y, they must have been members  of a limited class.
    
    See
    I        Memorandum
      _                     in Support  of Defendant E r n s t   &  Young's  Motion
    to Dismiss the Complaint  (I1E&Y Mem.") at 7-9.  Because, at t h e
    
    time E&Y performed its audits, plaintiffs by their own
    admission' were no more than llpotential investors" in any of
    
    
    
    45 institutions insured by the Rhode Island Share and Deposit
    Indemnity Corporation  (ttRISDIC tt)  -- members of the general
    investing public -- plaintiffs have no claim against E&Y for
    negligence or negligent misrepresentation and plaintiffs'
    complaint must be dismissed.  See, e.a.,  Biben v.  Card,
    
    NO.  84-0844-CIV-W-6, s l i p   op.  at 16  (W.D. Mo. Apr.  10, 1985)
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • CENTURY MORTGAGE CO., INC., ARTHUR MACDONALD,
  • DEFENDANT ERNST & YOUNG'S
  • REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS' MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS THE COMPLAINT
  • Defendant E r n s t & Young submits t h i s reply memorandum in further support of its motion
  • PLAINTIFFS WERE NOT MEMBERS OF A LIMITED
  • plaintiffs never dispute that, to state a claim against E&Y, they must have been members of a
  • to Dismiss the Complaint (I1E&Y Mem.") at 7-9.
  • 45 institutions insured by the Rhode Island Share and Deposit Indemnity Corporation --
  • File) ("liability of auditors and accountants for negligence or negligent misrepresentation.
  • to the general investing publicv1); 999 v. Cox & Co.,
  • Plaintiffs Seek to Apply the Wrons Lesal standard
  • Apart from their failure to meet the Itlimited classtt requirement, plaintiffs' argument that
  • at 7-8, runs counter to settled law both ip mode Island and in the vast majority of other
  • ' In their opposition to E&Y's motion to dismiss, plaintiffs do not even once mention this

  • 9 . PLF MEM IN OPP TO DISMISS

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    CREDIT CONSUMER SERVICES
    HEREINAFTER
    CCCS
    ASANKING INSTITUTION
    RHODE ISLAND
    
                                        STATE OF RHODE ISLAND                              SUPERIOR 
                                        PROVIDENCE, SC.
    
    
                                        CENTURY MORTGAGE CO.,  INC.,
                                        ARTHUR MACDONUD,
                                        DAVID MACDONALD and
                                        HENRY J.  KEIGWIN
                                        vs .                               :  C.A.  NO.  PC/93-7089
    
                                        KPMG PEAT MARWICK,
                                        PEAT  MARWICK, MAIN &  CO.,
                                        DANIEL F. SCHMITT and
                                        ERNST &  YOUNG
    
    
    
    
    
    
                                                    PLAINTIFFS' MEMORANDUM  IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT
                                                            ERNST &  YOUNG'S  MOTION TO DISMISS
    
                                                                    Factual Backqround
    
                                                 In 1988, plaintiff Century Mortgage Co.  Inc.,  was  a
                                        mortgage lending institution doing business in the states of
                                        Rhode Island,  New York, Connecticut, and Massachusetts.
                                        Amended Complaint, I 6 .   Century became aware that year that
    
    ;&  2  Commercial Credit Consumer Services, I n c ,  , (hereinafter, "CCCS" )
    I.,,..
               : ! x      :-,::.'
    .1?..7                  , *./8K
                          '  .>.
    
      c:
      L  % asanking institution based  in Rhode Island, was available for
                            -.,.
      r"+ .\..I,  -n
                                         r.n
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • ;& 2 Commercial Credit Consumer Services, I n c,, (hereinafter, "CCCS")
  • L % asanking institution based in Rhode Island,

  • 10 . PLF ANS TO DEFS 1ST INTER

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    KPMG PEAT MARWICK
    MACDONALD
    DAVID
    PEAT MARWICK
    BUSINESS EXPERIENCE
    EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUNDS
    PLAINTIFFS
    INTERROGATORIES
    PEAT MARWICK EMPLOYEES
    BLACKSTONE VALLEY
    ACQUISITION
    BARRY
    ENGAGEMENT
    MORTGAGE
    ARTHUR MACDONALD
    KEIGWIN
    RESPONDING
    RESIDENCE
    BIRTH
    PRESIDENT
    SURROUNDING
    JACK
    JOHN
    RISDIC INSURED BANKING
    INSURED BANKING INSTITUTION
    ROBERT WILLUMSTAD
    STATING
    DECISION-MAKING PROCESS
    CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
    
                                                                            0
    
    STATE OF RHODE ISLAND                                                  SUPERIOR COURT
    PROVIDENCE, SC.
    
    
    CENTURY MORTGAGE CO.,  INC.,
    ARTHUR MACDONALD,
    DAVID MACDONALD and
    HENRY J.  KEIGWIN
    vs .                                                                         7089
    
    KPMG PEAT MARWICK,
    PEAT MARWICK, MAIN b  CO.,
    DANIEL F.  SCHMITT and
    ERNST &  YOUNG
    
    
    
    
    
                       PLAINTIFF DAVID B.  MACDONXLD'S  ANSWERS TO
                       DEFENDANTS'  FIRST SET OF  INTERROGATORIES
    
    
             1.     Identify the individual(s) responding to these
    interrogatories by providing each individual's  full name,
    residence address, date of birth, present employment, job title
    and business address and indicate to which questions(s) each
    individual is responding.
    ANSWER:  My name is David B.  MacDonald and I reside at 71
    Boardley Road in Sandwich, Massachusetts.  I am the President of
    Mortgage Central Corp., President of Valley Management Corp.,
    Partner of Blackstone Valley Place Associates, and Trustee of 49
    Plain Street Nominee Trust, all of which entities are located at
    25 Blackstone Valley Place, Lincoln, Rhode Island.  My date of
    birth is September 20,  1956.
             2.     Identify all individuals who have  knowledge of  the
    circumstances surrounding the acquisition of  CCCS including, but
    not limited to, those.-.individuals
                                                          who contributed to or
    p a r t i c i p a t e d   i n  t h e   d e c i s i o i t o  proceed w i t h   t h e   acquisition.
    
    
    
    ANSWER:  The following individuals knew of the circumstances
    surrounding the acquisition of CCCS:  Barry D. Adelson, Jack
    Keigwin, Jack Zisk, James Meehan, Arthur MacDonald, Glenn
    Tourtellot, Frank Ray, E s q . ,   Barry Gordon, E s q . ,   David Olson, Jim
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • CENTURY MORTGAGE CO., INC., ARTHUR MACDONALD,
  • HENRY J. KEIGWIN
  • KPMG PEAT MARWICK,
  • PLAINTIFF DAVID B. MACDONXLD'S ANSWERS TO
  • Identify the individualresponding to these interrogatories by providing each individual's
  • I am the President of Mortgage Central Corp., President of Valley Management Corp., Partner
  • Plain Street Nominee Trust, all of which entities are located at 25 Blackstone Valley Place,
  • Identify all individuals who have knowledge of the circumstances surrounding the acquisition
  • ANSWER: The following individuals knew of the circumstances surrounding the acquisition of
  • , Barry Gordon, E s q.
  • , David Olson, Jim Billings and the following KPMG Peat Marwick employees: Dan Schmidt, Bob
  • the primary individual associated with CCCS who participated in the negotiations was a Robert
  • Describe the educational background and business experience of each of the individuals who
  • I understand that the other plaintiffs have also supplied resumes stating their educational
  • I am unaware of the educational backgrounds and business experience of the KPMG Peat Marwick
  • Describe the nature and extent of each of the Plaintiffs'.relationship with KPMG including,

  • 11 . PLF ANS TO DEFS 1ST INTER

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    PLAINTIFFS
    BUSINESS
    TRANSACTION
    PEAT MARWICK
    PRESIDENT
    CCCS
    ENGAGEMENT
    PROVIDENCE
    HENRY
    INTERROGATORIES
    RESPONDING
    RESIDENCE
    BIRTH
    RHODE ISLAND
    FRENCH
    LINCOLN
    MACDONALD
    BUSINESS EXPERIENCE
    PERSONNEL
    KIEL
    WEST GERMANY
    NATURE
    SCOPE
    KPMG PURSUANT
    PERSONAL PROFESSIONAL RELATIONSHIP
    INVESTOR
    ACQUISITION
    ADVISER
    CONSULTANT
    
    STATE OF RHODE ISLAND                             SUPERIOR COURT
    PROVIDENCE, SC.
    
    
    CENTURY MORTGAGE CO.,  IN7.t
    ARTHUR MACDONALD,                            /
    DAVID MACDONALD and           I
    HENRY J.  KEIGWIN             I
    vs .                          !
                                  1  //.             PC/93-7089
                                  !
    KPMG PEAT MARWICK,
    PEAT MARWICK,  MAIN &  CO.. i
    DANIEL F.  SCHMITT and  *           :
    ERNST &  YOUNG
    
    
    
    
    
                      PLAINTIFF HENRY J.  KEIGWIN'S  ANSWERS TO
                      DEFENDANTS'  FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES
    
    
             1.     Identify the individual(s) responding to these
    interrogatories by providing each individual's  full name,
    residence address, date of birth, present employment, job title
    and business address and indicate to which queStions(3) each
    individual is responding.
    ANSWER:  My name is Henry J.  Keigwin and I reside at  28
    
    Narragansett Bay Avenue, Warwick, Rhode Island.  I am the
    President of F.H.  French Co.,  Inc., located at 6  Blackstone
    valley Place, Suite 402,  in Lincoln, Rhode Island.  MY date Of
    birth is April 9,  1938.
    
    
    
    ANSWER:       The persons of whom I am aware who have knowledge of
    the transaction are Arthur MacDonald, David MacDonald, Barry
    Adelson, James Meehan, and the individuals at KPMG Peat Marwick
    (hereinafter, "KPMG") who were involved in the due diligence and
    analysis with respect to the transaction.  The only individual at
    KPMG whom I can name at this time is Daniel Schmitt and Carl
    Erickaon.
    
    
         3 .      Describe the educational background and business
    experience of each of the individuals who contributed to or
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • PROVIDENCE, SC.
  • PEAT MARWICK, MAIN & CO..
  • PLAINTIFF HENRY J. KEIGWIN'S ANSWERS TO
  • Identify the individualresponding to these interrogatories by providing each individual's
  • Narragansett Bay Avenue, Warwick, Rhode Island.
  • I am the President of F.H. French Co., Inc., located at 6 Blackstone valley Place, Suite 402,
  • The persons of whom I am aware who have knowledge of the transaction are Arthur MacDonald,
  • Describe the educational background and business experience of each of the individuals who
  • My business experience includes being president of Puritan Aerosol in Cumberland, R.I.,
  • Describe the nature and extent of each of the Plaintiffs' relationship with KPMG including,
  • My only personal professional relationship with KPMG
  • was as an investor in the acquisition of CCCS, for which transaction KPMG was our adviser and
  • KPMG personnel

  • 12 . DEF CENTMORT ANS TO INTER

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    BUSINESS EXPERIENCE
    KPMG
    EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUNDS
    MORTGAGE COMPANY
    ARTHUR MACDONALD
    PEAT MARWICK
    PLAINTIFFS
    EMPLOYMENT
    DAVID
    HENRY
    KEIGWIN
    DANIEL
    SCHMITT
    INTERROGATORIES
    RESPONDING
    RESIDENCE
    BIRTH
    RHODE ISLAND
    PRESIDENT
    ACQUISITION
    ACCOUNTANTS
    RISDIC INSURED BANKING
    INSURED BANKING INSTITUTION
    LAW FIRM LICHT
    SEMONOFF
    TRANSACTION
    STATING
    CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
    NATURE
    
    STATE OF RHODE ISLAND                             SUPERIOR COURT
    PROVIDENCE, SC.
    
    
    CENTURY MORTGAGE CO.,  1NC.f
    ARTHUR MACDONALD,
    DAVID MACDONALD and         1
    HENRY J.  KEIGWIN
    vs .
    KPMG PEAT MARWICK,                J
    PEAT MARWICK, MAIN &  CO
    DANIEL F.  SCHMITT and
    ERNST  &  YOUNG
    
    
    
    
    
    
              PLAINTIFF CENTURY MORTGAGE COMPANY,  INC.'S  ANSWERS TO
                            DEFENDANTS'  INTERROGATORIES
    
    
             1.     Identify the individual(s) responding to these
    interrogatories by providing each individual's  full name,
    residence address, date of birth, present employment, job title
    and business address and indicate to which questions(s) each
    individual is responding.
    ANSWER:  My name is Barry David Adelson and I reside at 2 9
    Broadview Drive in Barrington, Rhode Island.  I am the V i c e
    President of Domestic Loan and Investment Bank, located at 815
    Reservoir Avenue in Cranston, Rhode Island.  I am president of
    Century Mortgage Company, Inc.  My date of birth is April 10,
    1947.
    
    
    
          not limited to, those individuals who contributed to or
          participated in the decision to proceed with the acquisition.
          ANSWER:       I am aware of the following individuals who knew of the
          circumstances surrounding the acquisition of CCCS:  David
          MacDonald,  Henry J.  Keigwin,  James Meehan,  Arthur MacDonald,
          David Olson, our accountants Daniel Schmitt and Carl Erickson as
          well as others whose names I cannot now recall who were employed
    
          by KPMG  Peat Marwick, and our lawyers at the law firm Licht and
          Semonoff.  In addition, there were undoubtedly numerous people
          associated with CCCS who were aware of the transaction.
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • HENRY J. KEIGWIN
  • PLAINTIFF CENTURY MORTGAGE COMPANY, INC.'S ANSWERS TO
  • Identify the individualresponding to these interrogatories by providing each individual's
  • My name is Barry David Adelson and I reside at 2 9
  • Broadview Drive in Barrington, Rhode Island.
  • I am president of Century Mortgage Company,
  • those individuals who contributed to or participated in the decision to proceed with the
  • ANSWER: I am aware of the following individuals who knew of the circumstances surrounding the
  • by KPMG Peat Marwick, and our lawyers at the law firm Licht and Semonoff.
  • there were undoubtedly numerous people associated with CCCS who were aware of the transaction.
  • Describe the educational background and business experience of each of the individuals who
  • I understand that the other plaintiffs have also supplied resumes stating their educational
  • I am unaware of the educational backgrounds and business experience of the KPMG Peat Marwick
  • assumption that they were all certified public accountants.
  • Describe the nature and extent of each of the Plaintiffs' relationship with KPMG including,

  • 13 . DEF 1ST SET OF INTEROG

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    COMMUNICATION
    SUBSTANCE
    BUSINESS
    PLAINTIFF
    RECIPIENT
    DEFENDANT ACQUIRED KNOWLEDGE
    OBTAINED ACCESS
    VII
    VIII
    CUSTODY
    CONTROL THEREOF
    OCCUPATION
    EMPLOYER
    DOCUMENT EMBODYING
    INDICATING
    NATURE
    INVOLVEMENT
    
                                                             STATE OF  RHODE ISLAND
                               S'WPERIOR COURT
                                                             PROVIDENCE, SC.
    
    
                    . _,
                                                             CENTIJRY  MORTGAGE CO. , INC.
        ,)  ','
                                                             ARTHUR MACDONALD, DAVID                   
    
                                                             MACDONALD and HENRY J.                    
                                                                                                       
                                                             KEIGWIN,                                  
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
    
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
                                                                                     Plaintiffs,       
                                                             v.                                    \ 
                         PC 9 3 - 7 0 8 9
                                                                                                    
                                                             RPMG  PEAT  MARWICK,  PEAT  MARWICK,  :
                                                             MAIN &  CO.,  DANIEL F. SCHMITT
                                                             and ERNST  &  YOUNG,
                                                                                     Defendants.
    
                                                                                   DEFENDANTS' FIRST
                                                                                                 
    
                                                                      Pursuant to Rule 3 3   of the
      C.*..                  -n
      ~L, K ~
                                .,J . ~
         .-_  I:%
                              .+.,,*,.                       Rules of Civil Procedure, defendants KPMG
      X%,  f?[,
      -qv ...,.,,
      .,,. ...,, ,                                         C?
      :,,y>                  S,,J
                             ,.                       -%arwick,  Main  &  Co.  and  Daniel F. Schmitt
     __  :, -:, -77 --2:;
     c: .I                                            ._-
                             "(.  ,>,, ,,...-I
    -/_..                   : "' ~ "~ ' ~ ~ . , , . ~ ~ ~
                                                                           f  ~
                                                                            s  l a i ~ ~ t i f
                                                                               Century
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • authorof the document; to state the addresseeor other recipient of the document if any; to
  • To "identify" a natural person is to provide the person's full name; the person's occupation,
  • To "identify" a person other than a natural person is to provide the full name and present o
  • To "identify" a communication means to provide a statement whether the communication was oral

  • 14 . DEF 1ST REQ FOR PROD

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    REQUEST
    PRODUCTION
    POSSESSION
    PRIVILEGE
    DISCOVERY
    MATERIALS
    PROTECTION
    CUSTODIAN
    SUPPLEMENTAL PRODUCTION
    MARWICK
    DANIEL
    SCHMITT DIRECT PLAINTIFFS
    NOTATIONS
    ALTERATIONS
    RENDER
    FIRM
    CORPORATION ACTING
    REQUEST ACTION POSSESSION
    ADDRESSEE
    MATTER
    FACTS
    DEFENDANTS
    ATTORNEYS
    CONTROL
    PRIOR
    COURT PROCEEDING
    WHICHEVER
    COMPLIANCE
    INDICATION
    
                     . ..                -
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
                                                                           STATE OF RHODE  ISLAND
                      SUPERIOR COURT
                                                                           PROVIDENCE, SC.
    
                                                                           CENTURY MORTGAGE C O . ,  
                                                                           ARTHUR MACDONALD, DAVID
        ,rr
                                                                           MACDONALD and HENRY J.      
                                                                           KEIGWIN,                    
                                                                                                       
    
                                                                                                       
    
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
                                                                                              
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
                                                                           V .                         
                PC 9 3 - 7 0 8 9
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
                                                    >-                     KPMG  PEAT MARWICK, PEAT
                                                   ,j. MAIN &  C O . ,   DANIEL F. SCHMITT
                                                                           and  ERNST &  YOUNG,
    
                                                                                              
    
                                                                                            DEFENDANTS 
                                                                                                    OF
    
                                                   -_
         <;::;+  --                ,;->,  7 ;
                                  ,                               q;
                                                            *
                                  , ,  "."  ...,..._ -.                             Pursuant t o   Rule
                                  -  .//..                  ',::I  :+
        -3;7                   j:  ,':;                   .::i..;
       -.7,,,,,.             .-"';.'13~~~~~Rules
                                                                                      of  C i v i l  
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • ----I Marwick, Main & C o.
  • and Daniel F. Schmitt direct plaintiffs
  • Any notations, comments o r alterations on any copy render it non-identical and require
  • The materials enumerated in this request are to include any and all such materials as may be
  • privilege is made or as to which any claim of protection from discovery is made, identify the
  • Such supplemental production shall be made to defendants' attorneys no later than five days
  • Each document produced in compliance with this request should be accompanied by an indication

  • 15 . PLF REQ FOR PROD OF DOCS

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    REQUESTS
    MATTER
    PROVIDENCE
    MACDONALD
    RECORDINGS
    PHOTOGRAPHS
    BROCHURES
    DRAWINGS
    CUSTODY
    REPRESENTATION
    PRIVILEGE
    PROVISION
    PLAINTIFFS
    CONTROL
    COUNSEL
    AGENT
    EMPLOYEE
    ACTING
    HANDWRITTEN NOTATIONS
    DOCUMENT RENDER
    PSIVILEQED INFORMATION
    DISCOVERY
    DEFENDANT RELIES
    FACTS
    DEFENDANT BASES
    ADVICE
    SUCCEEDING REQUESTS
    WHATEVER
    CLIENT FILE
    
                       STATE OF RHODE ISLAND                            SUPERIOR COURT
                       PROVIDENCE, SC.
    
    
                       CENTURY  MORTGAGE CO.,  INC.,
                       ARTHUR MACDONALD,
                       DAVID MACDONALD and
                       HENRY J.  KEIGWIN
                       vs .                              :  C.A.  NO.  PC/93-7089 /
                                                                              /
                       KPMG PEAT MARWICK,                                   ./
                       PEAT MARWICK, MAIN &  CO.,
                        DANTEL F.  SCHFITT and
    I  ./  7,
    u , ,           ,'ERNST  &  YOUNG
             8
                    ,  "'
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
                                    PLAINTIFFS' REOUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS
                                                ADDRESSED TO DEFENDANTS
                                    KPMG PEAT MARWICK AND  PEAT MNtWICK, MAIN h  CO.
    
                                YOU are hereby requested to produce in accordance with Rule
                        34 of the Superior Court Rules of Civil Procedure true and exact
    
                        copies of the following documents to be mailed to R .   Daniel
                        Prentiss and Associates, 170 Westminster Street, Suite 1000,
                        Providence, RI  02903 within twenty (20) days  from the date of
                        service hereof.
                                             Definitions and Instructions
    
                                As  used herein, "document" shall mean the original and any
                        non-identical copy of every kind of written, printed, recorded,
                        graphic or photographic matter or sound reduction, including but
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • PROVIDENCE, SC.
  • ARTHUR MACDONALD,
  • communications, contracts, agreements, diaries, memoranda, logs, notes, analyses, reports,
  • Handwritten notations of any kind on any copy of a document render it nonidentical.
  • Psivileqed Information
  • claims is privileged or protected from discovery under R.C.P.
  • 26, identify the privilege or the rule upon which defendant relies, identify the document by
  • The complete file regarding these defendants' representation of, or provision of advice to,
  • The term "complete file," as used in this and succeeding requests, is intended to mean all

  • 16 . RESP OF DEF KPMGPM

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    PEAT MARWICK
    PARAGRAPH
    AVERMENTS
    INFORMATION SUFFICIENT
    TRUTH
    KPMG DENIES
    KPMG ADMITS
    PARTNER
    DANIEL
    SCHMITT
    ENGAGEMENT
    ACCOUNTING
    ISLAND
    DEFENDANTS
    COMPLAINT
    CONNECTION
    TAX
    ACTING
    CAPACITY
    MATTER
    PLAINTIFFS
    REFER
    SECOND PARAGRAPH
    KPMG PROVIDED ACCOUNTING
    SCHITT
    PROVISION
    ADVICE
    BANKING INSTITUTION
    RHO
    
    STATE OF RHODE ISLAND
    PROVIDENCE, SC.                                                                                    
    
    
    CENTURY MORTGAGE CO.,  INC.,
    ARTHUR J%ACDONALD,  DAVID
    MACDONALD and HENRY  J.
    KEIGWIN
    
    vs .                                                                                    C.A. :NO.
                                                              ,,           '
                                                                            .
    KPMG  PEAT  MARWICK,  PEAT                                 "                             ,.a
                                                               . > .    * .
    MARWICK, MAIN                                                                  / '
                                                                     ~
                         &  CO.
                                                  ,                         -  q,
    DANIEL F. SCHMITT and                                                  .:/
    ERNST  &  YOUNG
    
                                                        RESPONSE  OF DEFENDANTS
                      KPMG PEAT  MARWICK, PEAT  MARWICK, MAIN  &  c0.1
                                                        AND  DANIEL F. SCHMITT
    
             Defendants KPMG Peat Marwick, Peat Marwick, Main &  Co.,
    
    and Daniel F.  Schmitt (collectively, "KPMG") respond to the
    
    correspondingly numbered paragraphs of the Complaint as follows:
    
             1.  KPMG is without knowledge or information sufficient to
    
    form a belief as to the truth of the averments in Paragraph 1.
    
             2.       KPMG  is without knowledge or information sufficient to
    
    form a belief as to the truth of the averments in Paragraph 2.
    
             3.       KPMG denies the averments in Paragraph 3.
             4 .      KPMG admits that KPMG  Peat Marwick is a partnership
    
     engaged in the business of accounting and that it is the
    
     successor to certain interests of  Peat Marwick, Main &  Co.  KPMG
    
     denies the remaining averments in Paragraph 4.
    
             5.  KPMG admits that Daniel F. Schmitt  (llSchmittll) is a
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • STATE OF RHODE ISLAND
  • KPMG PEAT MARWICK, PEAT MARWICK, MAIN & c0.1
  • Defendants KPMG Peat Marwick, Peat Marwick, Main & Co.,
  • and Daniel F. Schmitt
  • KPMG is without knowledge or information sufficient to
  • form a belief as to the truth of the averments in Paragraph 1.
  • KPMG denies the averments in Paragraph 3.
  • KPMG admits that KPMG Peat Marwick is a partnership
  • partner of KPMG Peat Mar,wick, that he was acting i n his capacity
  • as a partner of KPMG in connection with the subject matter of the
  • Complaint and that the plaintiffs seek to refer to defendants
  • the second Paragraph 6 7.
  • KPMG admits that KPMG provided accounting services to
  • Century for the tax years 1986, 1987 and 1988 and that Schitt
  • was KPMG's engagement partner with respect to certain engagements
  • f o r the provision of services to Century.
  • truth of the averment t h a t Century relied on the advice of KPMG
  • to acquire a banking institution in the State of Rho& Island.
  • connection with the form of ownership of Commercial Credit

  • 17 . MEM TO DISMISS THE COMPL

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    ARTHUR
    BANK
    PEAT
    MARWICK
    DANIEL
    ERNST
    BADISCHE
    CAYLOR
    CREDIT
    BRIMS
    STERNER
    BROCKTON SAV
    MITCHELL
    CAMMER
    BLOOM
    CITIZENS
    KENNEDY
    COE
    COMEAU
    RUPP
    CONTICOMMODITY SERV
    LITIQ
    CREDIT ALLIANCE
    DOWLINS
    REDEVELOPMENT ACYENCY
    WOONSOCKET
    ESTATE
    BRASWELL
    CREDIT UNION
    
    STATE OF RHODE ISLAND
    PROVIDENCE, SC.
    
    CENTURY MORTGAGE CO.,  INC.,
    ARTHUR MACDONALD,
    DAVID MACDONALD and
             J
    HENRY J. REIGWIN                                                                                   
      PC/93-7089
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
    / I
    V.
    
    KPMG PEAT MARWICK,
    PEAT MARWICK, MAIN  &  CO. ,                                                                       
    DANIEL F.  SCHMITT and
    ERNST  &  YOUNG
    
    
                                                                                           MEMORANDUM 
                                    ERNST &  YOUNG'S  MOTION TO  DISMISS THE COMPLAINT
    
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
    HAM
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
    
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
    
    Of Counsel:
    
    Daniel F.  Kolb
    Jerome  G .   Snider
    DAVIS POLK &  WARDWELL
    450  Lexington Avenue
    New York,  New  York                                                                               
     ( 2 1 2 )   450- 4000
           -- and --
    1300 I Street, N.W.
    Washington, D.C.  20005
     (202) 962- 7000
    
    John E.  Matson
    William E.  Hammer, Jr.
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • CENTURY MORTGAGE CO., INC., ARTHUR MACDONALD,
  • KPMG PEAT MARWICK,
  • ERNST & YOUNG
  • Daniel F. Kolb Jerome G.
  • Badische Corp. v. Caylor, 825 F.2d 339 (11th C i r.
  • Bancohio Nat'l Bank v. Schiesswohl,
  • Brims v. Sterner, 529 F. Supp.
  • Brockton Sav.
  • Bank v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co., 577 F. supp.
  • Cammer v. Bloom, 711 F. Supp.
  • Citizens Nat`l Bank v. Kennedy & Coe,
  • Comeau v. Rupp, 810 F. Supp.
  • In re ContiCommodity Serv., Inc.
  • Sec., Litiq, 733 F. supp.
  • Credit Alliance Corp. v. Arthur Andersen & Co.,
  • Dowlins v. Narraqansett Capital Corp.,
  • E&J, Inc. v. Redevelopment Acyency of Woonsocket, 405 A.2d 1187 (R.I.
  • 11 Estate of Braswell v. People's Credit Union,

  • 18 . COMLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    BUSINESS
    RHODE ISLAND
    KPMG PEAT MARWICK
    YORK
    ACCOUNTING
    EMPLOYMENT
    SCHMITT
    MASSACHUSETTS
    PRACTICE
    PROVIDENCE
    MORTGAGE
    DANIEL
    ERNST
    CITIZENS
    AGENT
    ACTS
    SCOPE
    SCHRNITT
    DEFENDANT SCHMITT
    PARTNER
    A11
    ACTIONS INSOFAR
    SCHMITT HEREINAFTER
    MORTGAGE LENDING INSTITUTION
    CONNECTICUT
    PRIOR
    CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING
    PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
    ADVICE
    
    STATE OF RHODE  ISLAND                                                SUPERIOR COURT
    PROVIDENCE, SC.
    
    
                                                                                                      
                                                                                                /"
    CENTURY                                                                     {''
                      MORTGAGE  CO.,  INC.,
    ARTHUR MACDONALD,                                                                    ./
    DAVID MACDONALD and                                                         d
                                                                                        /
    HENRY  J.  KEIGWIN
    vs .                                          :  C.A.  NO.  PC/93-  7*tiq
    
    KPMG PEAT MARWICK,                                 PLAINTIFFS DEMAND A
    PEAT MARWICK, MAIN  &  CO.,                               TRIAL BY JURY
    DANIEL F.  SCHMITT and
    ERNST &  YOUNG
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
                                                COMPLAINT
    
             1.         Plaintiff Century Mortgage Co.,  Inc.  (hereinafter,
    
    "Century")  is a business corporation organized under the laws of
    
    the Commonwealth of Massachusetts,  and is authorized to conduct
    
    business ,in th e   State of Rhode Island and o t h e r   states.  Its
    principal place of business is i n  L i n c o l n ,   Rhode Island.
    
             2.         David MacDonald, Arthur MacDonald,  and Henry J.  Keigwin
    are citizens and residents of the States of  Massachusetts,
    Florida, and Rhode  Island, respectively.
    
             3 .        Peat Marwick,  Main  &  Co.  is a professional partnership
    engaged in the practice of accounting, with its principal place
    
    of business in Providence, Rhode Island.
    
    
    
         4 .      KPMG Peat Marwick is a business entity engaged in the
    practice of accounting, with its principal place of business in
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • business,in th e State of Rhode Island and o t h e r states.
  • Its principal place of business is i n L i n c o l n, Rhode Island.
  • are citizens and residents of the States of Massachusetts, Florida, and Rhode Island,
  • of business in Providence, Rhode Island.
  • KPMG Peat Marwick is a business entity engaged in the practice of accounting, with its
  • Co. is an agent of KPMG Peat Marwick, and the acts of Peat Marwick Main & Co., and its
  • Daniel F. Schrnitt is a citizen and resid,ent of the State of Rhode Island.
  • Defendant Schmitt is a partner and/or employee of Peat Marwick, a11 of whose actions insofar
  • Peat Marwick Main & Co., KPMG Peat Marwick, and Schmitt hereinafter will be collectively
  • Ernst & Young is a business entity engaged in the practice of accounting, with i t s
  • In 1988, Century was a mortgage lending institution, authorized to do business, and doing
  • In 1988, and for a period of many years prior to 1988, Century's certified public accounting
  • Century consulted and relied on the advice of Peat Marwick for

  • 19 . CASE COVERSHEET

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    PETITION
    DAMAGE
    SUPERIOR COURT
    APPEALS
    TAX
    PROPERTY DAMAGE
    MALPRACTICEIOTHER
    PERSONAL INJURY
    TRUSTEEIACCOUNTING
    WITNESS
    CIVIL
    PEAT MARWICK
    MACDONALD
    DANIEL
    PROBATE
    RELIEF
    CHARTER
    COMMON LAW
    RECOVERY
    WRIT
    CONVERSION
    CLEARING
    JUDGEMENT
    ARBITRATION
    PET
    RTA ARBITRATION
    FOC FORFEITURE
    PIN PET
    INVENTORY
    
                                     STATE OF RHODE ISLAND                                             
    IL
                                            SUPERIOR COURT                                             
                                                                                                       
    y  Clerk's Office)
    
                                                                                        I
    
          Superior Court.                                                                              
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
    
          PLAINTIFFS:                                                                        DEFENDANTS:
          CENTURY  MORTGAGE  C O . ,   INC.,                                                  KPMG PEAT
          ARTHUR  MACDONALD,                                                                  PEAT
          DAVID MACDONALD  and                                                                DANIEL  F
          HENRY  J .   KEIGWIN                                                                ERNST  6 
    
                                       I
    
                                                                                                   -
          NATURE o~ PROCEED ING -
                                                        Check the applicable  case  type  under the 
    
          District Court Appeal  0
                                       yes  (Check type  below)               CIVIL ACTIONS
                                                                                                       
    -     0
              AGA  Agency  appeal                               0
                                                                   DPC  Denial of  probate claim       
    
          0
              ALA  Alienation  of  affection                    0
                                                                   EXT  Excessive tax                  
                                                                                                       
    
          0
              ANT  Anti-trust                                   0
                                                                   INR  Injunctive relief              
                                                                                                       
    vehicle
          0
               AS6  Assault  and battery                        0
                                                                   IPL  Interpleader                   
          0
               BKA  Book  account                               0
                                                                   LIB  Libelislander                  
    r
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • SUPERIOR COURT
  • KPMG PEAT MARWICK, ARTHUR MACDONALD,
  • DANIEL F.
  • CIVIL ACTIONS
  • PDM Property damage 0 ANT Anti-trust
  • RIC Reinstate charter 0 CLA Common law assignment
  • DIN Recovery of damageshnsurance U CLL Common law lien
  • ROF Recovery of funds CON Contract
  • MOT Malpracticeiother
  • writ of C CNV Conversion
  • U TCO Title clearing (other than tax title) fl CIC Criminal inj compensation
  • PER Personal injury
  • I DOJ Debt on judgment
  • IDV Personal injiproperty dam-vehicle El TRA Trusteeiaccounting
  • RTA Arbitration] referral
  • FOC Forfeiture of charter
  • D PIN Pet for inventory (wire ta;@ ';?
  • PTD Pet to take deposition 0 CND Condemnation
  • C1 PCR Post conviction relief fl CFC Confirm compromise
  • Cl OSW Out of state witness
  • R5A Rule 5A petition U EDP End partnership
  • T DOT Trustee:declinatlon of 0 Other than above (specify type):
  • PROBATE APPEALS
  •    |