LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v SMARTBOX SYSTEMS GROUP, INC., et al Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: LR-14733, CourtCode: DIS, CourtName: INC., ET AL. (UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN, Defendant: Smartbox Systems Group, Inc., et al., Plaintiff: SEC, State: PA Pennsylvania, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>LR-14733, Smartbox, Flowers, Securities, Exchange Commission, Investors, District, Funds, Pennsylvania, Relief, Freeze, Assets, Account, Ogburn, Smartbox Systems Group, District Court, Eastern District, Civil, Seeking, Injunctions, Complaint, Smartbox Common Stock, Risk, Money, Wireless, License, Communications, Charges, Violations, Act, Disgorgement , ContentID: 120243318

Case Documents
1 1995-11-27 SEC LITIGATION RELEASE
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 106412
2 pages
TXT
Total Documents: 1 document , 2 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC LITIGATION RELEASE

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
FLOWERS
SECURITIES
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
INVESTORS
DISTRICT
FUNDS
PENNSYLVANIA
RELIEF
FREEZE
ASSETS
ACCOUNT
OGBURN
SMARTBOX SYSTEMS GROUP
DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT
CIVIL
SEEKING
INJUNCTIONS
COMPLAINT
SMARTBOX COMMON STOCK
RISK
MONEY
WIRELESS
LICENSE
COMMUNICATIONS
CHARGES
VIOLATIONS
ACT
DISGORGEMENT

-------------------- BEGINNING OF PAGE #1 -------------------

 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

LITIGATION RELEASE NO. 14733 / November 27, 1995

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. SMARTBOX SYSTEMS GROUP
INC., ET AL. (United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Pennsylvania, Civil Action No. 95-7237)

     On November 16, 1995, the Securities and Exchange Commission
("Commission") filed an emergency action in U.S. District Court
for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania seeking a temporary
restraining order ("TRO"), preliminary and permanent injunctions,
and other expedited relief against Smartbox Systems Group Inc.
("Smartbox") and its president and chairman, Theodore K. Flowers
("Flowers").  The action also seeks a freeze of assets against
Smartbox.  The Honorable Stewart Dalzell granted the TRO and the
freeze of assets, and scheduled a preliminary injunction hearing
for December 14, 1995.

     The Commission's complaint alleges that, from at least
November 1994 through the present, Flowers engaged in a $1
million fraudulent offering of Smartbox common stock.  Flowers
and Smartbox have raised at least $65,000 from at least eight
individuals, and nearly all of the funds have been
misappropriated.  In furtherance of the scheme, Flowers made
materially false and misleading statements to investors
concerning, among other things, the risk in the investment.  He
portrayed the investment in Smartbox common stock as low risk, by
telling investors that almost all of their money would be held in
an escrow account, used only to acquire a wireless
telecommunications license through the Federal Communications
Commission, and returned to them in the event that the company
was unable to acquire such a license.  In reality, Flowers
deposited the investor funds in a Smartbox bank account that he
controlled, and used the funds to pay various personal and
business expenses.  He also gave some of the money to Kymberly
Ogburn ("Ogburn"), who was his girlfriend at the time.

     In the action, the Commission charges Smartbox and Flowers
with violations of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933
and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
Rule 10b-5 thereunder.  The complaint seeks to obtain ancillary
relief from the them in the form of disgorgement, prejudgment
interest and civil penalties and seeks an accounting.  The action
also names Ogburn as a relief defendant for purposes of seeking
SNIPPETS:
  • SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. SMARTBOX SYSTEMS GROUP INC., ET AL. (United States
  • On November 16, 1995, the Securities and Exchange Commission filed an emergency action in
  • The Honorable Stewart Dalzell granted the TRO and the freeze of assets, and scheduled a
  • The Commission's complaint alleges that, from at least November 1994 through the present,
  • In furtherance of the scheme, Flowers made materially false and misleading statements to
  • He portrayed the investment in Smartbox common stock as low risk, by telling investors that
  • In reality, Flowers deposited the investor funds in a Smartbox bank account that he
  • In the action, the Commission charges Smartbox and Flowers with violations of Section 17of
  • The complaint seeks to obtain ancillary relief from the them in the form of disgorgement,
  • The action also names Ogburn as a relief defendant for purposes of seeking an asset freeze
  •    |