LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v MARADA GLOBAL CORPORATION and MARADA CAPITAL, INC Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: LR-14801, Defendant: Marada Global Corporation and Marada Capital, Inc., Plaintiff: SEC, State: FL Florida, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>LR-14801, Marada, Securities, Commission, Exchange, Disclose, Complaint, Permanent Injunction, Future Violations, Penny Stock, Hatfield, Casino, United States, District, Florida, Judgement, Enjoining, Broker-dealer, Federal Securities Laws, Motion, Temporary Restraining Order, President, Act, Marada Air, Hotels, Nationwide, Agreements, Reality, Listing, Nasdaq , ContentID: 120243252

Case Documents
1 1996-01-30 SEC LITIGATION RELEASE
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 106346
2 pages
TXT
Total Documents: 1 document , 2 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC LITIGATION RELEASE

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
SECURITIES
COMMISSION
EXCHANGE
DISCLOSE
COMPLAINT
PERMANENT INJUNCTION
FUTURE VIOLATIONS
PENNY STOCK
HATFIELD
CASINO
DEFENDANTS
UNITED STATES
DISTRICT
FLORIDA
JUDGEMENT
ENJOINING
BROKER-DEALER
FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS
MOTION
TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
PRESIDENT
ACT
MARADA AIR
HOTELS
NATIONWIDE
AGREEMENTS
REALITY
LISTING
NASDAQ
==========================================START OF PAGE 1======

         UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

LITIGATION RELEASE NO. 14801 / January 30, 1996

SEC v. Marada Global Corporation, et al., Case No. 94-1504-CIV-T-
21A (M.D. Fla.)

     The Securities and Exchange Commission announced that on
January 22, 1996, Honorable Ralph Nimmons, United States District
Judge for the Middle District of Florida, entered a final
judgment of permanent injunction against Marada Global
Corporation ("Marada Global") and Marada Capital, Inc. ("Marada
Capital") (collectively "Marada Corporations"), of Clearwater,
Florida, enjoining them from future violations of the
registration, antifraud, broker-dealer registration, and penny
stock disclosure provisions of the federal securities laws.

     Previously, on September 23, 1994, the Commission filed a
Complaint and motion for temporary restraining order and other
emergency motions against the Marada Corporations and Roc G.
Hatfield ("Hatfield"), the Chief Executive Officer ("CEO") and
President of Marada Global and the CEO of Marada Capital,
alleging violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the
Securities Act of 1933, Sections 10(b), 15(a) and 15(g) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rules 10b-5, 15g-2, 15g-4,
15g-5 and 15g-9, thereunder.

     Specifically, the Complaint alleged that from at least
August 1993 through September 1994, through the use of boiler
rooms and other high pressure tactics, Marada Capital sold at
least $2 million of unregistered penny stock of two Marada Global
subsidiaries, Marada Air, Inc. ("Marada Air") and Marada Casino
Resort Hotels, Inc. ("Marada Casino"), to at least 200 investors
nationwide, at $1 per share.  The Complaint further alleged that
none of the Marada entities made any filings with the Commission,
and Marada Capital was never registered with the Commission as a
broker-dealer.

     Furthermore, the Complaint alleged that through the use of
glossy color brochures, prospectuses, flyers, scripts and other
solicitation documents, Hatfield, Marada Global and Marada
Capital: (a) represented that Marada Global had exclusive
agreements with Caribbean island nations to operate and develop
an airline, casinos and hotels when, in fact, no such agreements
existed; (b) omitted to disclose that the "vice presidents"
selling Marada stock were, in reality, telemarketers earning 40%
SNIPPETS:
  • UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
  • The Securities and Exchange Commission announced that on January 22, 1996, Honorable Ralph
  • Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rules 10b-5, 15g-2, 15g-4, 15g-5 and 15g-9, thereunder.
  • Specifically, the Complaint alleged that from at least August 1993 through September 1994,
  • The Complaint further alleged that none of the Marada entities made any filings with the
  • Furthermore, the Complaint alleged that through the use of glossy color brochures, ions; represented that Marada would apply for listing and be traded on the NASDAQ exchange when, in
  • On September 23, 1994, the Court entered a temporary restraining order against the defendants.
  • On October 18, 1995, the Court entered a preliminary injunction against the defendants
  •    |