==========================================START OF PAGE 1======
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS
LITIGATION RELEASE NO. 14804 / January 30, 1996
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. GENE BLOCK, INDIVIDUALLY
AND D/B/A BLOCK CONSULTING SERVICES, RENATE HAAG, INDIVIDUALLY
AND D/B/A HAAG + PARTNER, AND ROBERT T. RILEY, JR., INDIVIDUALLY
AND D/B/A THE ROBERTS GROUP (United States District Court for the
District of Massachusetts, Civil Action No. 95-11748RCL).
The Commission announced that on January 30, 1996, the
Honorable Reginald C. Lindsay of the U.S. District Court for the
District of Massachusetts granted the Commission's application
for a preliminary injunction against Renate Haag ("Haag") of
Langen, Germany and Malibu, California, doing business as Haag +
Partner. The Court also scheduled a contempt hearing against
Haag on February 26, 1996 for failing to comply with a temporary
restraining order that was entered against her on October 26,
1995.
Specifically, she has failed to file a sworn accounting,
repatriate investor funds and identify all investors.
Under the terms of the preliminary injunction, Haag is
preliminarily enjoined from continuing her fraudulent offering of
securities. The Court's order also continues a freeze on Haag's
assets, requires Haag to file a sworn accounting, orders the
repatriation of investor funds and grants other relief. The
relief was entered in connection with an enforcement action
alleging that Haag was engaging in an ongoing, fraudulent
securities offering of so-called "prime bank instruments" in
violation of the antifraud and registration provisions of the
federal securities laws.
Specifically, the Commission alleges that since at least
October 1994, Haag has been the central figure in a fraudulent
scheme that has induced members of the public to invest over $1
million in her programs by promising, in some cases, returns as
high as 200%-420% annually. In addition to Haag, Gene Block of
Durham, North Carolina ("Block"), doing business as Block
Consulting Services, and Robert T. Riley, Jr. of St. Louis,
Missouri ("Riley"), doing business as The Roberts Group, were
offering and selling the unregistered and fraudulent Haag +
Partner programs through various methods, including
advertisements on the Internet. Previously, on August 8, 1995,
the Court entered a temporary restraining order and asset freeze
SNIPPETS:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. GENE BLOCK,
AND D/B/A BLOCK CONSULTING SERVICES, RENATE HAAG, INDIVIDUALLY
AND D/B/A HAAG + PARTNER, AND ROBERT T. RILEY, JR., INDIVIDUALLY
AND D/B/A THE ROBERTS GROUP (United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts,
The Commission announced that on January 30, 1996, the Honorable Reginald C. Lindsay of the
Specifically, she has failed to file a sworn accounting, repatriate investor funds and
Under the terms of the preliminary injunction, Haag is preliminarily enjoined from continuing
The Court's order also continues a freeze on Haag's assets, requires Haag to file a sworn
The relief was entered in connection with an enforcement action alleging that Haag was
Specifically, the Commission alleges that since at least October 1994, Haag has been the
The Commission further alleges that as an inducement to potential investors,
The Defendants have falsely represented that the initial investment is guaranteed against
The Defendants have also fraudulently represented that investors' funds are doubled by buying
The Commission seeks the following relief: a permanent injunction prohibiting the Defendants
|