LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v JOHN ANDERSON Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: LR-14819, CourtCode: DIS, CourtName: O MALLEY, DISTRICT COURT JUDGE FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF, Defendant: John Anderson, Plaintiff: SEC, State: OH Ohio, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>LR-14819, Anderson, Securities, Phar-mor, Exchange Commission, Michael Monus, John Anderson, Jeffrey Walley, Fraudulent Scheme, Financial Statements, Patrick, Finn, District, Violating, Antifraud Provisions, Securities Laws, Act, Overstated Income, Investors, Thereunder, Order Imposes, Civil Penalty, Alleging Violations, Books, Corporate Profits, Fraudulent Activities, Fraud, False Financial Statements, Growing Financial Problems, Induced Investors , ContentID: 120243234

Case Documents
1 1996-02-16 SEC LITIGATION RELEASE
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 106328
1 pages
TXT
Total Documents: 1 document , 1 page.    CAUTION.    PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS IS A ONE PAGE CASE.
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC LITIGATION RELEASE

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
SECURITIES
PHAR-MOR
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
MICHAEL MONUS
JOHN ANDERSON
JEFFREY WALLEY
FRAUDULENT SCHEME
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
PATRICK
FINN
DISTRICT
VIOLATING
ANTIFRAUD PROVISIONS
SECURITIES LAWS
ACT
OVERSTATED INCOME
INVESTORS
THEREUNDER
ORDER IMPOSES
CIVIL PENALTY
ALLEGING VIOLATIONS
BOOKS
CORPORATE PROFITS
DEFENDANTS
FRAUDULENT ACTIVITIES
FRAUD
FALSE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
GROWING FINANCIAL PROBLEMS
INDUCED INVESTORS
==========================================START OF PAGE 1======


         UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Litigation Release No. 14819 / February 16, 1996

Accounting and Auditing Relaease No. 761 / February 16, 1996

SEC v. MICHAEL MONUS, PATRICK FINN, JOHN ANDERSON AND JEFFREY
WALLEY, Case No. 4:95 CV 975, (N.D. OH, filed May 2, 1995)

     The Securities and Exchange Commission announced that an
     Agreed Order of Permanent Injunction was entered against
     John Anderson on January 10, 1996, by the Honorable Kathleen
     O'Malley, District Court Judge for the Northern District of
     Ohio.  The Order enjoins Anderson from violating the
     antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws,
     specifically Section 17(a) of the Securities Act and Section
     10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder.
     Additionally, the Order imposes a $10,000 civil penalty
     against Anderson.

     Previously, on May 2, 1995, the Commission filed a complaint
     against John Anderson, as well as Jeffrey Walley, Patrick
     and Michael Monus, alleging violations of the antifraud
     provisions of the securities laws.  The Complaint alleged
     that from at least 1987 through 1992, Monus, Finn and
     Anderson, and, beginning in July 1990, Walley, while
     employed at Phar-Mor, Inc., engaged in a fraudulent scheme
     in which they falsified Phar-Mor's books, records and
     financial statements in order to artificially increase
     corporate profits.  As a result of the defendants'
     fraudulent activities, from fiscal year 1987 through 1991,
     Phar-Mor cumulatively overstated income by $290 million.
     (In fiscal year 1992, the year in which the fraud was
     detected, Phar-Mor overstated income by approximately $238
     million.)  Further, the complaint alleged, false financial
     statements and records concealed Phar-Mor's growing
     financial problems and, during the course of the fraudulent
     scheme, induced investors to invest over $500 million in
     Phar-Mor.
SNIPPETS:
  • The Securities and Exchange Commission announced that an Agreed Order of Permanent Injunction
  • The Order enjoins Anderson from violating the antifraud provisions of the federal securities
  • Additionally, the Order imposes a $10,000 civil penalty against Anderson.
  • Previously, on May 2, 1995, the Commission filed a complaint against John Anderson, as well
  • The Complaint alleged that from at least 1987 through 1992, Monus, Finn and Anderson, and,
  • As a result of the defendants' fraudulent activities, from fiscal year 1987 through 1991,
  • (In fiscal year 1992, the year in which the fraud was detected, Phar-Mor overstated income by
  • Further, the complaint alleged, false financial statements and records concealed Phar-Mor's
  •    |