LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v JEFFREY L. CASPERSON and JEROME L. CASPERSON Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: LR-14821, CourtName: JEROME L. CASPERSON ARE IN CIVIL CONTEMPT OF THE COURT S FINAL, Defendant: Jeffrey L. Casperson and Jerome L. Casperson, Plaintiff: SEC, State: CA California, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>LR-14821, Securities, Casperson, Exchange Commission, Jeffrey, Jerome Casperson, Judgments, Permanent Injunction, Investors, Civil, District, Contempt, Pay, Disgorgement, Act, Limited Partnership, Trust, Thereunder, Admitting, Denying, Allegations, Complaint, Entry, Fraudulent, Sale, Gas Limited Partnership, Wells, Preset, Production , ContentID: 120243232

Case Documents
1 1996-02-22 SEC LITIGATION RELEASE
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 106326
1 pages
TXT
Total Documents: 1 document , 1 page.    CAUTION.    PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS IS A ONE PAGE CASE.
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC LITIGATION RELEASE

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
CASPERSON
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
DEFENDANTS
JEFFREY
JEROME CASPERSON
JUDGMENTS
PERMANENT INJUNCTION
INVESTORS
CIVIL
DISTRICT
CONTEMPT
PAY
DISGORGEMENT
COURT
ACT
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
TRUST
THEREUNDER
ADMITTING
DENYING
ALLEGATIONS
COMPLAINT
ENTRY
FRAUDULENT
SALE
GAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
WELLS
PRESET
PRODUCTION
==========================================START OF PAGE 1======

             U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Litigation Release No.  14821 / February 22, 1996

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. AMERICAN BUSINESS
SECURITIES, INC., ET AL., Civil Action No. 94-4866 ER(JRx) (C.D.
Cal.)

     The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission")
announced that on February 20, 1996, the Honorable Edward
Rafeedie, United States District Judge for the Central District
of California, found that Defendants Jeffrey L. Casperson and
Jerome L. Casperson are in civil contempt of the Court's Final
Judgments against them.  These Defendants failed to comply with
their Final Judgments which ordered, among other things, Jeffrey
Casperson to pay $4,062,614.00 in disgorgement and Jerome
Casperson to pay $6,313,663.34 in disgorgement, together with
prejudgment interest thereon.  The Court ordered Jeffrey and
Jerome Casperson to appear on March 4, 1996 for further
proceedings regarding this matter, including immediate
incarceration should they fail to purge themselves of their
contempt by that date.  The Court had previously entered
Judgments of Permanent Injunction against these Defendants, which
permanently enjoined them from violations of the antifraud
provisions of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and
Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule
10b-5 thereunder.  Jeffrey and Jerome Casperson consented,
without admitting or denying the allegations in the Complaint, to
the entry of the Judgments of Permanent Injunction.

     From mid-1989 to mid-1994, the Defendants engaged in the
fraudulent offer and sale of oil and gas limited partnership and
trust investments.  The limited partnerships and trusts in some
cases did not own the wells as represented and returns to
investors were preset and not based on actual well production.
Approximately $44.7 million was raised from over 1,000 investors,
most of whom are elderly.
SNIPPETS:
  • U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
  • SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. AMERICAN BUSINESS SECURITIES, INC., ET AL., Civil
  • The Securities and Exchange Commission announced that on February 20, 1996, the Honorable
  • These Defendants failed to comply with their Final Judgments which ordered, among other
  • The Court ordered Jeffrey and Jerome Casperson to appear on March 4, 1996 for further
  • The Court had previously entered Judgments of Permanent Injunction against these Defendants,
  • 10b-5 thereunder.
  • Jeffrey and Jerome Casperson consented, without admitting or denying the allegations in the
  • the Defendants engaged in the fraudulent offer and sale of oil and gas limited partnership
  • The limited partnerships and trusts in some cases did not own the wells as represented and
  •    |