LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v JOHN C. HICKS Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: LR-14825, CourtCode: DIS, CourtName: DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO, WESTERN, Defendant: John C. Hicks, Plaintiff: SEC, State: OH Ohio, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>LR-14825, Securities, Ohio, Hicks, Complaint, Investors, Exchange Commission, District, United States, Pleasure Time, Injunction, Welch, Alleges, Recruit, Lottery, Permanent, Relief, District Court, Southern District, Violating, Act, Gdd, Acra, Technical Obstacles, Antifraud, Registration Provisions, Federal Securities Laws, Preliminary Injunction Order, Freeze, Assets , ContentID: 120243228

Case Documents
1 1996-02-26 SEC LITIGATION RELEASE
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 106322
2 pages
TXT
Total Documents: 1 document , 2 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC LITIGATION RELEASE

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
OHIO
HICKS
COMPLAINT
INVESTORS
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
DISTRICT
UNITED STATES
PLEASURE TIME
INJUNCTION
WELCH
ALLEGES
DEFENDANTS
RECRUIT
LOTTERY
PERMANENT
RELIEF
DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT
VIOLATING
ACT
GDD
ACRA
TECHNICAL OBSTACLES
ANTIFRAUD
REGISTRATION PROVISIONS
FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ORDER
FREEZE
ASSETS
==========================================START OF PAGE 1======

         UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Litigation Release No. 14825 / February 26, 1996

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. PLEASURE TIME, INC. d\b\a
TELEPHONE INFORMATION SYSTEMS, et al. (S.D. Ohio, Civil Action
No. C-1-95-178)

     The Securities and Exchange Commission announced that on
August 1, 1995, an Order of Permanent Injunction and Other Relief
was entered against John C. Hicks (Hicks) by the United States
District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Western
Division, in Cincinnati, Ohio.  Without admitting or denying the
allegations in the Commission's complaint, except as to subject
matter jurisdiction, Hicks consented to the entry of an order
permanently enjoining him from violating Sections 5(a), 5(c) and
17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the
Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder; and ordering
disgorgement, plus prejudgment interest, payment of which was
waived based on Hicks' demonstrated inability to pay.

     The Commission filed its complaint on March 13, 1995,
seeking injunctive and other relief against Hicks, Pleasure Time,
Minette Acra-Kelly, d\b\a Group Dynamics Downline (GDD), Richard
A. Welch (Welch), and Minette Acra-Kelly (Acra), entities and
persons located in Florida, Ohio and Indiana. The Commission's
complaint alleges that the defendants participated in a
fraudulent sales scheme involving unregistered securities that
were offered and sold to approximately 20,000 investors raising
over $3 million.  Investors were recruited through a "multi-level
marketing" system in which investors were encouraged to recruit
other investors.  Investors were recruited by telephone,
facsimile delivery, and the Internet and other computer networks.

They were allegedly told that they could reap enormous profits
from a world wide telephone lottery.  The lottery program was
purportedly going to employ a 900 number to attract players with
projected receipts of $300 million.  According to the complaint,
defendants understated and failed to disclose legal, regulatory
and technical obstacles to starting a lottery.  The complaint
further alleges, among other things, that defendants variously
violated the antifraud and registration provisions of the federal
securities laws.  On March 24, 1995, the United States District
Court for the Southern District of Ohio entered a preliminary
injunction order, including a freeze of assets, against Pleasure
Time, GDD, Acra and Welch.
SNIPPETS:
  • UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
  • SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. PLEASURE TIME, INC. d\b\a TELEPHONE INFORMATION
  • Ohio, Civil Action No. C-1-95-178)
  • The Securities and Exchange Commission announced that on August 1, 1995, an Order of
  • Without admitting or denying the allegations in the Commission's complaint, except as to
  • The Commission filed its complaint on March 13, 1995, seeking injunctive and other relief
  • The Commission's complaint alleges that the defendants participated in a fraudulent sales
  • Investors were recruited through a "multi-level marketing" system in which investors were
  • The lottery program was purportedly going to employ a 900 number to attract players with
  • According to the complaint, defendants understated and failed to disclose legal, regulatory
  • The complaint further alleges, among other things, that defendants variously violated the
  • On March 24, 1995, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio entered
  •    |