LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v SAMUEL L. WILLIAMS Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: LR-14831, Defendant: Samuel L. Williams, Plaintiff: SEC, State: IN Indiana, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>LR-14831, Securities, Williams, Exchange, Act, Investors, Exchange Commission, Samuel, Civil, Judgement, Brokerdealer, Money, Pay, Permanent Injunction, Consent, Judgment Enjoins Williams, Violating, Promulgated Thereunder, Mutual Funds, Personal Expenses, Scheme, Mailing Customers False, False Brokerage Account, Brokerage Account Statements, Account Statements Showing, Showing Fictitious Purchases, Pay Payment, Disgorgement, Amount, Civil Penalties , ContentID: 120243222

Case Documents
1 1996-03-04 SEC LITIGATION RELEASE
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 106316
1 pages
TXT
Total Documents: 1 document , 1 page.    CAUTION.    PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS IS A ONE PAGE CASE.
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC LITIGATION RELEASE

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
WILLIAMS
EXCHANGE
ACT
INVESTORS
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
LITIGATION
SAMUEL
CIVIL
JUDGEMENT
BROKERDEALER
MONEY
PAY
PERMANENT INJUNCTION
CONSENT
JUDGMENT ENJOINS WILLIAMS
VIOLATING
PROMULGATED THEREUNDER
MUTUAL FUNDS
PERSONAL EXPENSES
SCHEME
MAILING CUSTOMERS FALSE
FALSE BROKERAGE ACCOUNT
BROKERAGE ACCOUNT STATEMENTS
ACCOUNT STATEMENTS SHOWING
SHOWING FICTITIOUS PURCHASES
PAY PAYMENT
DISGORGEMENT
AMOUNT
CIVIL PENALTIES
==========================================START OF PAGE 1======

         UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

     LITIGATION RELEASE NO. 14831 / March 4, 1996



     SEC v. Samuel L. Williams, Civil Action No. 95-8384-CIV-
     HURLEY (S.D. Fla.)

     The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission")
     announced that on February 8, 1996, the Honorable Daniel T.
     K. Hurley entered a final judgment of permanent injunction,
     by consent, against Samuel L. Williams ("Williams"), a
     former registered representative of a registered broker-
     dealer.

     The final judgment enjoins Williams from violating Section
     17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 ("Securities Act"), 15
     U.S.C.  77e(a), and Section 10(b) of the Securities
     Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act"), 15 U.S.C.  78j(b),
     and Rule 10b-5, 17 C.F.R.  240.10b-5, promulgated
     thereunder.

     The Complaint alleged that between March 15, 1991 and May
     13, 1992, Williams, while associated as a registered
     representative, falsely represented to investors that he
     would invest their money in mutual funds and/or other
     securities, when, in fact, he used the money to pay for his
     own personal expenses and to make personal investments.  In
     total, the Complaint alleged that Williams misappropriated
     approximately $1.5 million from eight investors.  The
     Complaint further alleged that Williams concealed the scheme
     by, among other things, mailing customers false brokerage
     account statements showing fictitious purchases of
     securities.

     Based upon Williams' demonstrated financial inability to pay
     payment of disgorgement in the amount of $1,513,327 was
     waived
     and civil penalties were not ordered. For further
information,   see Litigation Release No. 14554.
SNIPPETS:
  • UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
  • SEC v. Samuel L. Williams,
  • The Securities and Exchange Commission announced that on February 8, 1996, the Honorable
  • The final judgment enjoins Williams from violating Section 17of the Securities Act of 1933,
  • The Complaint alleged that between March 15, 1991 and May 13, 1992, Williams, while
  • the Complaint alleged that Williams misappropriated approximately $1.5 million from eight
  • The Complaint further alleged that Williams concealed the scheme by, among other things,
  • Based upon Williams' demonstrated financial inability to pay payment of disgorgement in the
  • see Litigation Release No. 14554.
  •    |