==========================================START OF PAGE 1======
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
LITIGATION RELEASE NO. 14831 / March 4, 1996
SEC v. Samuel L. Williams, Civil Action No. 95-8384-CIV-
HURLEY (S.D. Fla.)
The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission")
announced that on February 8, 1996, the Honorable Daniel T.
K. Hurley entered a final judgment of permanent injunction,
by consent, against Samuel L. Williams ("Williams"), a
former registered representative of a registered broker-
dealer.
The final judgment enjoins Williams from violating Section
17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 ("Securities Act"), 15
U.S.C. 77e(a), and Section 10(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act"), 15 U.S.C. 78j(b),
and Rule 10b-5, 17 C.F.R. 240.10b-5, promulgated
thereunder.
The Complaint alleged that between March 15, 1991 and May
13, 1992, Williams, while associated as a registered
representative, falsely represented to investors that he
would invest their money in mutual funds and/or other
securities, when, in fact, he used the money to pay for his
own personal expenses and to make personal investments. In
total, the Complaint alleged that Williams misappropriated
approximately $1.5 million from eight investors. The
Complaint further alleged that Williams concealed the scheme
by, among other things, mailing customers false brokerage
account statements showing fictitious purchases of
securities.
Based upon Williams' demonstrated financial inability to pay
payment of disgorgement in the amount of $1,513,327 was
waived
and civil penalties were not ordered. For further
information, see Litigation Release No. 14554.
SNIPPETS:
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SEC v. Samuel L. Williams,
The Securities and Exchange Commission announced that on February 8, 1996, the Honorable
The final judgment enjoins Williams from violating Section 17of the Securities Act of 1933,
The Complaint alleged that between March 15, 1991 and May 13, 1992, Williams, while
the Complaint alleged that Williams misappropriated approximately $1.5 million from eight
The Complaint further alleged that Williams concealed the scheme by, among other things,
Based upon Williams' demonstrated financial inability to pay payment of disgorgement in the
see Litigation Release No. 14554.
|