LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v HAROLD GANTZ Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: LR-14833, CourtCode: DIS, CourtName: TRIAL ON CRIMINAL CHARGES IN THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE, Defendant: Harold Gantz, Plaintiff: SEC, State: NY New York, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>LR-14833, Glantz, Securities, Exchange Commission, District, Preliminary Injunction, Complaint, Prime Bank, Credit, United States, Harold Glantz, Peter, Judge, District Court, Disgorgement, Civil Penalties, Investment, Instruments, Zero, Letters, Complaint Alleges, Pbns, Zicis, Zlocs, Violations, Antifraud Provisions, Federal Securities Laws, Determination, Criminal Charges, Massachusetts, Lit , ContentID: 120243220

Case Documents
1 1996-03-05 SEC LITIGATION RELEASE
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 106314
1 pages
TXT
Total Documents: 1 document , 1 page.    CAUTION.    PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS IS A ONE PAGE CASE.
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC LITIGATION RELEASE

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
SECURITIES
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
DISTRICT
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
COMPLAINT
PRIME BANK
CREDIT
UNITED STATES
HAROLD GLANTZ
PETER
JUDGE
DISTRICT COURT
DISGORGEMENT
CIVIL PENALTIES
INVESTMENT
INSTRUMENTS
ZERO
LETTERS
COMPLAINT ALLEGES
PBNS
ZICIS
ZLOCS
VIOLATIONS
ANTIFRAUD PROVISIONS
FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS
DETERMINATION
CRIMINAL CHARGES
MASSACHUSETTS
LIT






        UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Litigation Release No. 14833 / March 5, 1996

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. HAROLD GLANTZ and PETER H.
BLOCK 94 Civ. 5737, (CSH)

The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") announced
that, on February 23, 1996, Judge Charles S. Haight of the United
States District Court, Southern District of New York, entered an
Order of Preliminary Injunction by Consent against Harold Glantz
("Glantz").  The Preliminary Injunction stems from a Complaint
filed by the Commission against Glantz and Peter H. Block on
August 8, 1994, seeking, among other things, injunctive relief,
disgorgement and civil penalties in connection with a "Prime
Bank" investment scheme.  According to the Complaint, Glantz and
Block raised at least $2 million from investors by telling them
that their funds would be used to obtain a credit line to
purchase, sell and\or trade "prime bank" instruments such as
prime bank notes ("PBNs"), zero interest credit instruments
("ZICIs"), and zero interest letters of credit ("ZLOCs").  The
Commission's Complaint alleges that PBNs, ZICIs, and ZLOCs are
fictitious.

Judge Haight's Order preliminarily enjoined Glantz from further
violations of the antifraud provisions of the federal securities
laws and left the issues of disgorgement and civil penalties for
determination at a later date.  Glantz is currently awaiting
trial on criminal charges in the U.S. District Court for the
District of Massachusetts.

For further information, see Lit. Rel. No. 14186.
SNIPPETS:
  • UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
  • SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. HAROLD GLANTZ and PETER H. BLOCK 94 Civ.
  • The Securities and Exchange Commission announced that, on February 23, 1996, Judge Charles S.
  • The Preliminary Injunction stems from a Complaint filed by the Commission against Glantz and
  • According to the Complaint, Glantz and Block raised at least $2 million from investors by
  • The Commission's Complaint alleges that PBNs, ZICIs, and ZLOCs are fictitious.
  • Judge Haight's Order preliminarily enjoined Glantz from further violations of the antifraud
  • Glantz is currently awaiting trial on criminal charges in the U.S. District Court for the
  • For further information, see Lit.
  •    |