LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v THOMAS F. LANIER Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: LR-14838, CourtCode: DIS, CourtName: DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA, Defendant: Thomas F. Lanier, Plaintiff: SEC, State: NC North Carolina, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>LR-14838, Lanier, Lindley, Securities, Exchange Commission, Thomas, Indictment, Merger, United States, Middle District, North Carolina, Trading Profits, Salem Carpet Mills, Shaw Industries, Civil Action, Burlington, Neighbor, Non-public Information Relating, Confidential Merger Negotiations, Potential Merger Partner, General Timing, Pay Lanier, Divide, Illegal Trading Profits, Trading Profits According, Agreement, Lindley Paid Lanier, Filing, Facts, Matter , ContentID: 120243215

Case Documents
1 1996-03-07 SEC LITIGATION RELEASE
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 106309
1 pages
TXT
Total Documents: 1 document , 1 page.    CAUTION.    PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS IS A ONE PAGE CASE.
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC LITIGATION RELEASE

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
LINDLEY
SECURITIES
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
THOMAS
INDICTMENT
MERGER
UNITED STATES
LITIGATION
MIDDLE DISTRICT
NORTH CAROLINA
TRADING PROFITS
SALEM CARPET MILLS
SHAW INDUSTRIES
CIVIL ACTION
BURLINGTON
NEIGHBOR
NON-PUBLIC INFORMATION RELATING
CONFIDENTIAL MERGER NEGOTIATIONS
POTENTIAL MERGER PARTNER
GENERAL TIMING
PAY LANIER
DIVIDE
ILLEGAL TRADING PROFITS
TRADING PROFITS ACCORDING
AGREEMENT
LINDLEY PAID LANIER
FILING
FACTS
MATTER
==========================================START OF PAGE 1======

         UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Litigation Release No. 14838 / March 7, 1996

Securities & Exchange Commission v. Thomas F. Lanier
(Middle District of North Carolina, Civil Action No. 95-367

     The Securities and Exchange Commission announced that on
March 4, 1996, a federal jury sitting in the United States
District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
convicted Thomas F. Lanier on a five-count criminal indictment
alleging insider trading violations in connection with
transactions in the stock of Salem Carpet Mills, Inc.  (United
States v. Thomas F. Lanier, 95CR317-1).  The criminal charges
included securities fraud and money laundering.  Salem Carpet
Mills, Inc., is a former North Carolina-based, publicly traded
carpet manufacturer.

     The indictment alleged that in January 1992, Thomas Lanier,
while then Salem's chief financial officer and a director,
improperly disclosed to William Clarke Lindley, his Burlington,
N.C. neighbor, material, non-public information relating to
Salem's confidential merger negotiations with Shaw Industries.
This information included the identity of Shaw Industries as
Salem's potential merger partner and the general timing of the
merger.  Salem and Shaw Industries announced a merger on February
10, 1992.  The indictment alleged that Lindley and Lanier had
agreed for Lindley to pay Lanier 35% of his trading profits from
the inside information.  The indictment further alleged that
Lanier and Lindley met on February 11, 1992, to divide the
illegal trading profits according to their agreement, and that
Lindley paid Lanier $27,500.

     The Commission previously announced the filing of a civil
action on May 24, 1995 (Litigation Release No. 14507 ) based on
the same set of facts.  That matter is still in litigation.
SNIPPETS:
  • UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
  • Securities & Exchange Commission v. Thomas F. Lanier (Middle District of North Carolina,
  • Salem Carpet Mills, Inc., is a former North Carolina-based, publicly traded carpet
  • The indictment alleged that in January 1992, Thomas Lanier, while then Salem's chief
  • This information included the identity of Shaw Industries as Salem's potential merger partner
  • The indictment alleged that Lindley and Lanier had agreed for Lindley to pay Lanier 35% of
  • The indictment further alleged that Lanier and Lindley met on February 11, 1992, to divide
  • The Commission previously announced the filing of a civil action on May 24, 1995 (Litigation
  • That matter is still in litigation.
  •    |