LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v PIERCE, CARRIE WILLIAMS PIERCE, et al Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: LR-15055, CourtName: ASSETS WHICH HAD BEEN IMPOSED BY EARLIER COURT ORDERS, ORDERED, Defendant: Pierce, Carrie Williams Pierce, Pierce andInvestments Co., a/k/a Pierce Investments & Co., Inc., Plaintiff: SEC, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>LR-15055, Pierce, Investment, Securities, Exchange Commission, Judgement, Williams, Complaint, Alleges, Investment Advisory, Investment Advisory Clients, Robert Pierce, Investment Adviser, Provisions, Staff, Court Orders, Accounting, Ordered Disgorgement, Ill-gotten Gains, Civil Penalties, Amounts, Filing, Investment Advisory Services, Funds, Blue Chip, Substantiate, Firm, Purchased Securities, Lit, Nos , ContentID: 120242999

Case Documents
1 1996-09-19 SEC LITIGATION RELEASE
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 106093
1 pages
TXT
Total Documents: 1 document , 1 page.    CAUTION.    PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS IS A ONE PAGE CASE.
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC LITIGATION RELEASE

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
INVESTMENT
SECURITIES
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
JUDGEMENT
WILLIAMS
DEFENDANTS
COMPLAINT
ALLEGES
INVESTMENT ADVISORY
INVESTMENT ADVISORY CLIENTS
ROBERT PIERCE
INVESTMENT ADVISER
PROVISIONS
STAFF
COURT ORDERS
ACCOUNTING
ORDERED DISGORGEMENT
ILL-GOTTEN GAINS
CIVIL PENALTIES
AMOUNTS
FILING
INVESTMENT ADVISORY SERVICES
FUNDS
BLUE CHIP
SUBSTANTIATE
FIRM
PURCHASED SECURITIES
LIT
NOS





         UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Litigation Release No. 15055 / September 19, 1996

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. ROBERT PIERCE et al., 95
Civ. 8215, USDC, SDNY (SHS)

The Securities and Exchange Commission announced that, on May 31,
1996, a Default Judgment was issued by Judge Sidney H. Stein of
the U.S.D.C., S.D.N.Y., against Robert Pierce ("Pierce"), a
registered investment adviser, Carrie Williams Pierce
("Williams") and Pierce Investments Co., a/k/a Pierce Investments
& Co., Inc. ("Pierce Investments").  The Default Judgment enjoins
the defendants from future violations of the antifraud provisions
of the federal securities laws, as well as of the books and
records provisions of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940.  The
Judgment also continued in effect the freeze of the defendants'
assets which had been imposed by earlier court orders, ordered
the defendants to submit an accounting, and ordered disgorgement
of ill-gotten gains and civil penalties in amounts to be
determined at a later date.

The Complaint, which was filed on September 26, 1995, alleges
that, beginning in or about 1993 through the date of filing,
Pierce, Williams and Pierce Investments raised approximately
$65,000 from at least 5 investors, for whom they were providing
investment advisory services.  The Complaint alleges that Pierce
told his clients that their funds would be invested in "blue
chip" securities, but that Pierce refused to provide the
Commission's staff with any records which would substantiate the
fact that his firm has purchased securities on behalf of his
investment advisory clients.  The Complaint further alleges that,
in an attempt to deceive the Commission's staff, Pierce and
Williams claimed that they had no investment advisory clients.
For further information, see Lit. Rel. Nos. 14653 and 14679.
SNIPPETS:
  • SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. ROBERT PIERCE et al.,
  • The Securities and Exchange Commission announced that, on May 31, 1996, a Default Judgment
  • The Default Judgment enjoins the defendants from future violations of the antifraud
  • The Judgment also continued in effect the freeze of the defendants' assets which had been
  • The Complaint, which was filed on September 26, 1995, alleges that, beginning in or about
  • The Complaint alleges that Pierce told his clients that their funds would be invested in
  • For further information, see Lit.
  • Rel. Nos.
  •    |