LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v KIMBERLY D. GOODMAN Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: LR-15063, CourtCode: DIS, CourtName: SEPTEMBER 13, 1996, THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE, Defendant: Kimberly D. Goodman, Plaintiff: SEC, State: CA California, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>LR-15063, Goodman, Securities, Commission, Clients, Exchange Commission, Balances, District, California, Judgement, Refco, Consenting, Injunction, Assistance, Wymer, Auditors, Cash, Accounts, Letters, Clients Losing, Amount, Audit Confirmation Letters, Confirmation Letters Verifying, Balances Ranging, Zero, Wymer Paid Goodman, Luxury Gifts, Mercedes Benz, Rolex Watch, Entry, Securities Industry , ContentID: 120242994

Case Documents
1 1996-09-23 SEC LITIGATION RELEASE
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 106088
1 pages
TXT
Total Documents: 1 document , 1 page.    CAUTION.    PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS IS A ONE PAGE CASE.
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC LITIGATION RELEASE

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
SECURITIES
COMMISSION
CLIENTS
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
BALANCES
DISTRICT
CALIFORNIA
JUDGEMENT
REFCO
CONSENTING
INJUNCTION
ASSISTANCE
WYMER
AUDITORS
CASH
ACCOUNTS
LETTERS
CLIENTS LOSING
AMOUNT
AUDIT CONFIRMATION LETTERS
CONFIRMATION LETTERS VERIFYING
BALANCES RANGING
ZERO
WYMER PAID GOODMAN
LUXURY GIFTS
MERCEDES BENZ
ROLEX WATCH
ENTRY
SECURITIES INDUSTRY
==========================================START OF PAGE 1======

             U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

LITIGATION RELEASE NO. 15063 / September 23, 1996

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Kimberly D. Goodman, Civil
Action No. CV-96-5706 RJK (Ex) (C.D. Cal);

     The Securities and Exchange Commission announced that on
September 13, 1996, the United States District Court for the
Central District of California entered a judgment permanently
enjoining a former employee of Refco Securities, Inc., Kimberly
D. Goodman, from committing future violations of the antifraud
provisions of the federal securities laws.  Goodman consented to
the injunction without admitting or denying the allegations in
the Commission's complaint.

     The judgment was entered in a lawsuit filed by the
Commission on August 6, 1996.  In that action, the Commission
alleged that Goodman assisted the former California money
manager, Steven D. Wymer, in an investment scheme that resulted
in Wymer's clients losing more than $80 million.  The Commission
further alleged, among other things, that between July 1988 and
November 1991, Goodman lied to Wymer's clients and their auditors
about the amount of cash and securities they had in their
accounts at Refco.  For instance, Goodman signed at least 20
audit confirmation letters verifying fictitious account balances
to the auditors of Wymer's clients.  In those letters, Goodman
stated that the clients had balances ranging from $400,000 to
$75,000,000, when in fact the clients' balances were often near
zero.  In exchange for her assistance, Wymer paid Goodman
approximately $183,000 in cash and bestowed on her approximately
$130,000 in luxury gifts, including a $60,000 Jaguar convertible,
a Mercedes Benz and a Rolex watch.

     In addition to consenting to the entry of an injunction
against her, Goodman also agreed to be barred from the securities
industry.


SNIPPETS:
  • Securities and Exchange Commission v. Kimberly D. Goodman, Civil Action No. CV-96-5706 RJK
  • The Securities and Exchange Commission announced that on September 13, 1996, the United
  • The judgment was entered in a lawsuit filed by the Commission on August 6,
  • In that action, the Commission alleged that Goodman assisted the former California money
  • The Commission further alleged, among other things, that between July 1988 and November 1991,
  • Goodman signed at least 20 audit confirmation letters verifying fictitious account balances
  • In those letters, Goodman stated that the clients had balances ranging from $400,000 to
  • In exchange for her assistance, Wymer paid Goodman approximately $183,000 in cash and
  • In addition to consenting to the entry of an injunction against her, Goodman also agreed to
  •    |