LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v JOHN G. BENNETT, JR Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: LR-15095, Defendant: John G. Bennett, Jr., Plaintiff: SEC, State: PA Pennsylvania, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>LR-15095, Era, Bennett, Indictment, Funds, Anonymous Donors, Alleges, Money, Accounts, United States, Securities, Eastern District, Pennsylvania, Fraud, Benefactors, Matching, Loan, Exchange, Commission, John, Filing, Money Laundering, Gifts, Scheme, Non-profit, Holding Period, Representations, Paid, Nonprofit Organizations, Trust Agreements, Matching Payments , ContentID: 120242963

Case Documents
1 1996-09-30 SEC LITIGATION RELEASE
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 106057
2 pages
TXT
Total Documents: 1 document , 2 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC LITIGATION RELEASE

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
BENNETT
INDICTMENT
FUNDS
ANONYMOUS DONORS
ALLEGES
MONEY
ACCOUNTS
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES
EASTERN DISTRICT
PENNSYLVANIA
FRAUD
BENEFACTORS
MATCHING
LOAN
EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
JOHN
FILING
MONEY LAUNDERING
GIFTS
SCHEME
NON-PROFIT
HOLDING PERIOD
REPRESENTATIONS
PAID
NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS
TRUST AGREEMENTS
MATCHING PAYMENTS





         UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Litigation Release No. 15095 / September 30, 1996

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JOHN G. BENNETT (E.D. Pa., Filed
September 27, 1996)

          Michael R. Stiles, the United States Attorney for the
Eastern District of Pennsylvania, and the Securities and Exchange
Commission ("Commission") announced the indictment on September
27, 1996 in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania of John G.
Bennett, Jr. ("Bennett"), the founder and former president of the
Foundation For New Era Philanthropy ("New Era").  The E.D. Pa.
indictment charges Bennett with sixteen counts of mail fraud,
eighteen counts of wire fraud, one count of bank fraud, one count
of false statements to the government, three counts of filing
false tax returns, one count of impeding the administration of
the revenue laws, fifteen counts of money laundering, and twenty-
seven counts of money laundering to promote an unlawful activity.


     The indictment against Bennett is based, in large part, upon
the same essential facts as are alleged in the Commission's
complaint against Bennett and New Era, which was filed in the
Eastern District of Pennsylvania on May 18, 1995.  The indictment
alleges that Bennett's conduct resulted in losses of $135,000,000
and in the filing for bankruptcy protection by New Era in May,
1995. The indictment also alleges that Bennett operated the New
Era Concepts program at New Era.  New Concepts offered individual
benefactors a chance to double their gifts to charity.  The funds
to double the gifts allegedly came from "anonymous donors."
Later in the scheme, non-profit organizations were offered the
opportunity to double funds by submitting them to New Era.  These
organizations could send money to New Era and have the funds
matched by the anonymous donors and returned.  The matching
allegedly occurred after a three to nine month holding period.
The indictment alleges that the operation of this scheme brought
in approximately $354,000,000.  The indictment says that, in
order to obtain funds from benefactors and nonprofit
organizations, Bennett made various representations about the
operation of New Era, all of which were false.  Some of these
representations are: 1) that the anonymous donors existed, that
they provided matching funds, and that there were trust
SNIPPETS:
  • UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
  • Commission announced the indictment on September 27, 1996 in the Eastern District of
  • the founder and former president of the Foundation For New Era Philanthropy.
  • indictment charges Bennett with sixteen counts of mail fraud, eighteen counts of wire fraud,
  • The indictment alleges that Bennett's conduct resulted in losses of $135,000,000 and in the
  • New Concepts offered individual benefactors a chance to double their gifts to charity.
  • Later in the scheme, non-profit organizations were offered the opportunity to double funds by
  • These organizations could send money to New Era and have the funds matched by the anonymous
  • The matching allegedly occurred after a three to nine month holding period.
  • The indictment says that, in order to obtain funds from benefactors and nonprofit
  • 1) that the anonymous donors existed, that they provided matching funds, and that there were in escrow or "quasi-escrow" accounts at Prudential Securities, Inc. during the holding period,
  •    |