LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v GEORGE A. ROTELLI Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: LR-15123, Defendant: George A. Rotelli, Plaintiff: SEC, State: VT Vermont, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>LR-15123, Rotelli, Securities, Fund, Investment, Clients, Exchange Commission, Complaint, District, Act, United States, George, Filing, Vermont, Investment Adviser, Judgement, Alleges, Account, Instructions, Fictitious Account Statements, Statements Purportedly Showing, Criminal Information Charging, Fraud, Connection, Scheme, Administrative Proceeding, Securities Industry, Plead Guilty, Criminal Charges, Grant David Ward , ContentID: 120242935

Case Documents
1 1996-10-15 SEC LITIGATION RELEASE
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 106029
2 pages
TXT
Total Documents: 1 document , 2 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC LITIGATION RELEASE

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
SECURITIES
FUND
INVESTMENT
CLIENTS
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
COMPLAINT
DISTRICT
ACT
UNITED STATES
GEORGE
FILING
VERMONT
INVESTMENT ADVISER
JUDGEMENT
ALLEGES
ACCOUNT
INSTRUCTIONS
FICTITIOUS ACCOUNT STATEMENTS
STATEMENTS PURPORTEDLY SHOWING
ATTORNEY
CRIMINAL INFORMATION CHARGING
FRAUD
CONNECTION
SCHEME
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
SECURITIES INDUSTRY
PLEAD GUILTY
CRIMINAL CHARGES
GRANT DAVID WARD
==========================================START OF PAGE 1======

         UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

LITIGATION RELEASE No. 15123 \ October 15, 1996

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION V. GEORGE A. ROTELLI, Civil
Action No. 2:96-CV-340 (D. VT)

     The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") today
announced the filing of a Complaint in the United States District
Court for the District of Vermont against George A. Rotelli
("Rotelli"), a stockbroker and investment adviser formerly
associated with American Express Financial Advisors, Inc. for
misappropriating $116,988 from five clients.  Rotelli consented
to the entry of a Final Judgment without admitting or denying the
allegations in the Complaint.  The Final Judgment permanently
enjoins Rotelli from violating the antifraud provisions of the
federal securities laws (Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of
1933, Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5
thereunder, and Sections 206(1) and 206(2) of the Investment
Advisers Act of 1940), and orders Rotelli to disgorge the sum of
$116,988, plus prejudgment interest of $21,385, for a total of
$138,373.

     Specifically, the Complaint alleges that between November
1992 and January 1996, Rotelli offered investments in a
fictitious mutual fund that he called the "Government Securities
Income Fund IV."  In fact, no such fund existed.  The Complaint
further alleges that Rotelli misrepresented to his clients that
the fund was backed by U.S. Treasury securities, would generate a
return of 6.5 - 7.25%, and that their principal would be
guaranteed.  In reliance on these representations, Rotelli's
clients gave him checks totalling $116,988, which, pursuant to
Rotelli's instructions, were made payable to Rotelli.  Instead of
investing his clients' funds, Rotelli deposited the checks into
his personal checking account and converted the funds to his own
use.  Rotelli further defrauded his clients by providing them
with fictitious account statements purportedly showing the
increase in value of their investment.

     Simultaneous with the filing of the Commission's action, the
U.S. Attorney for the District of Vermont filed a criminal
information charging Rotelli with fraud in connection with his
scheme, and the Commission also instituted an administrative
proceeding against Rotelli in which he was barred from the
securities industry.  Rotelli has agreed to plead guilty to the
criminal charges.
SNIPPETS:
  • UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
  • SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION V. GEORGE A. ROTELLI,
  • The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced the filing of a Complaint in the
  • Rotelli consented to the entry of a Final Judgment without admitting or denying the
  • Specifically, the Complaint alleges that between November 1992 and January 1996, Rotelli
  • In reliance on these representations, Rotelli's clients gave him checks totalling $116,988,
  • Rotelli further defrauded his clients by providing them with fictitious account statements
  • Simultaneous with the filing of the Commission's action, the U.S. Attorney for the District
  • Rotelli has agreed to plead guilty to the criminal charges.
  • Grant David Ward 424-5936
  •    |