LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v MICHELLE P. SUPPES and MARK ANTHONY Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: LR-15388, Defendant: Michelle P. Suppes and Mark Anthony, Plaintiff: SEC, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>LR-15388, Securities, Suppes, Anthony, Exchange Commission, Bar Order, Consent, Broker, Dealer, Michelle, Mark, Civ, Rpp, Judgments, Complaint, Injunctions, Violating, Investment, Exchange Act, Civil, Allegations, Permanent Injunctions, Order Barring, Municipal Securities Dealer, Investment Adviser, Investment Company, Pay Civil Penalties, Registered Broker-dealer, Civil Injunctive Action, Anthony Sarivola , ContentID: 120242672

Case Documents
1 1997-06-19 SEC LITIGATION RELEASE
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 105766
2 pages
TXT
Total Documents: 1 document , 2 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC LITIGATION RELEASE

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
SUPPES
ANTHONY
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
BAR ORDER
CONSENT
BROKER
DEALER
LITIGATION
MICHELLE
MARK
CIV
RPP
JUDGMENTS
COMPLAINT
INJUNCTIONS
VIOLATING
INVESTMENT
EXCHANGE ACT
CIVIL
ALLEGATIONS
PERMANENT INJUNCTIONS
ORDER BARRING
MUNICIPAL SECURITIES DEALER
INVESTMENT ADVISER
INVESTMENT COMPANY
PAY CIVIL PENALTIES
REGISTERED BROKER-DEALER
CIVIL INJUNCTIVE ACTION
ANTHONY SARIVOLA





                   UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

     Litigation Release No. 15388 / June 19, 1997

     Securities and Exchange Commission v. Michelle P. Suppes and Mark
Anthony
     (U.S.D.C. - S.D.N.Y.) 97 Civ. 2376 (RPP)

          The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") announced
the
     entry on May 27, 1997 of final judgments on consent against Michelle
P.
     Suppes ("Suppes") and Mark Anthony ("Anthony").  Without admitting or
     denying the allegations in the Commission's Complaint, Suppes and
Anthony
     each consented to permanent injunctions against violating (i) a
Commission
     Order barring them from association with any broker, dealer,
municipal
     securities dealer, investment adviser or investment company ("Bar
Order"),
     and (ii) Section 15(b)(6)(B)(i) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934,
     which prohibits any person subject to a Bar Order from associating with
a
     broker or dealer.  Suppes and Anthony also consented to pay civil
penalties
     of $5,000 each.

          The Complaint alleged that Suppes and Anthony were violating both
the
     Bar Order and Section 15(b)(6)(B)(i) of the Exchange Act by continuing
to
     associate with Suppes Securities, Inc., a registered broker-dealer.
The
     Commission issued the Bar Order following final judgments on consent
     entered against Suppes and Anthony in a prior civil injunctive
action,
     Securities and Exchange Commission v. Anthony Sarivola, et al.
(U.S.D.C. -
     S.D.N.Y.) 95 Civ. 9270 (RPP).  See Litigation Release No. 15214
(January
     15, 1997).
SNIPPETS:
  • UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
  • Litigation Release No. 15388 / June 19,
  • Securities and Exchange Commission v. Michelle P. Suppes and Mark Anthony
  • 97 Civ.
  • 2376 (RPP)
  • The Securities and Exchange Commission announced the entry on May 27, 1997 of final judgments
  • Without admitting or denying the allegations in the Commission's Complaint, Suppes and
  • broker or dealer.
  • Suppes and Anthony also consented to pay civil penalties of $5,000 each.
  • The Complaint alleged that Suppes and Anthony were violating both the Bar Order and Section
  • Commission issued the Bar Order following final judgments on consent entered against Suppes
  •    |