LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v MARK E. GATCH and HENRY BENJAMIN SCHMIDT Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: LR-15394, CourtName: COMPLAINT ON JUNE 24, 1997 IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE, Defendant: Mark E. Gatch and Henry Benjamin Schmidt, Plaintiff: SEC, State: OH Ohio, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>LR-15394, Investors, Gatch, Schmidt, Securities, Ohio, United States, Exchange Commission, Complaint, Fund, Trading, Act, Mark, Scheme, Investment Adviser, Kentucky, Promissory Notes, Profits, Civil Penalty, Henry, Benjamin, District, Resident, Co-founder, Florida, Soliciting, Representations, Losses, Fraud, Performance Claims , ContentID: 120242666

Case Documents
1 1997-06-25 SEC LITIGATION RELEASE
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 105760
4 pages
TXT
Total Documents: 1 document , 4 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC LITIGATION RELEASE

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
GATCH
SCHMIDT
SECURITIES
OHIO
UNITED STATES
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
COMPLAINT
FUND
TRADING
ACT
MARK
SCHEME
INVESTMENT ADVISER
KENTUCKY
PROMISSORY NOTES
PROFITS
CIVIL PENALTY
HENRY
BENJAMIN
DISTRICT
DEFENDANTS
RESIDENT
CO-FOUNDER
FLORIDA
SOLICITING
REPRESENTATIONS
LOSSES
FRAUD
PERFORMANCE CLAIMS
                   UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

     LITIGATION RELEASE NO. 15394 / June 25, 1997

     SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION V. MARK E. GATCH AND HENRY
BENJAMIN
     SCHMIDT, Case No. C-1-97-599 (SSB) (S.D. Ohio, W.D.)

          The Securities and Exchange Commission announced the filing of a
     complaint on June 24, 1997 in United States District Court for the
Southern
     District of Ohio, Western Division, alleging a Ponzi scheme operated by
Ben
     Mar Investments, Inc. ("Ben Mar"), a defunct unregistered investment
     adviser based in Florence, Kentucky.  Named as defendants were:

          *    Mark E. Gatch ("Gatch"), age 39, a resident of Amelia, Ohio
and
               the co-founder, president, and chief financial officer of
Ben
               Mar;

          *    Henry Benjamin Schmidt ("Schmidt"), age 63, a resident of
               Crestview Hills, Kentucky, and St. Petersburg, Florida, and
the
               co-founder and owner of Ben Mar.

     The Commission's Complaint alleges as follows:

          From February 1992 through March 1995, Gatch and Schmidt, through
Ben
     Mar, raised approximately $19.5 million from at least 365 investors
by
     selling unregistered promissory notes that promised interest based on
the
     performance of an investment pool managed by Ben Mar (the "Ben Mar
Fund").
     The investors were located in Kentucky, Ohio, Florida, and other
states.
     In soliciting investors, Gatch and Schmidt told investors that they
could
     expect to earn profits on their investment of 4% to 5% per month, based
on
     past performance.  Gatch also made false representations concerning
his
     trading strategy and the risks of that strategy.  Contrary to these
     representations, Gatch's trading consistently resulted in substantial
     losses.  Gatch concealed these losses, and maintained the illusion of
SNIPPETS:
  • UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
  • SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION V. MARK E. GATCH AND HENRY BENJAMIN
  • SCHMIDT,
  • The Securities and Exchange Commission announced the filing of a complaint on June 24, 1997
  • District of Ohio, Western Division, alleging a Ponzi scheme operated by Ben
  • Mar Investments, Inc., a defunct unregistered investment adviser based in Florence, Kentucky.
  • * Henry Benjamin Schmidt, age 63, a resident of
  • co-founder and owner of Ben Mar.
  • raised approximately $19.5 million from at least 365 investors by selling unregistered
  • The investors were located in Kentucky, Ohio, Florida, and other states.
  • In soliciting investors, Gatch and Schmidt told investors that they could expect to earn
  • Gatch also made false representations concerning his trading strategy and the risks of that
  • Gatch concealed these losses, and maintained the illusion of trading profits, by using the
  • By the time the scheme came to light, investors had lost approximately $12.2 million,
  • Mar investors, illegally sold unregistered securities of Ben Mar, and failed to comply with
  • Schmidt, however, failed to investigate the performance claims and failed to take any steps
  • In addition to the fraud on investors in the Ben Mar Fund -- which was an unregistered
  • The Complaint charges both defendants with violating or aiding and abetting violations of
  • Act and Rule 206-2 thereunder, and seeks permanent injunctive relief, a civil penalty against
  •    |