LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v J. SCOTT ESKIND Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: LR-15395, CourtName: OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISERS ACT OF 1940. THE COURT ORDERED A FREEZE, Defendant: J. Scott Eskind, Plaintiff: SEC, State: GA Georgia, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>LR-15395, Eskind, Investors, Asset, Securities, Management, Commission, Tower, Exchange Commission, Act, United States, Scott Eskind, District, Georgia, Relief, Investment Advisers, Accounting, Scheme, Funds, Complaint, Induce, Disclose, General Partner, Purpose, Falsifying, Books, Thefts, Eskind Solicited Investments, Offering Documents , ContentID: 120242665

Case Documents
1 1997-06-25 SEC LITIGATION RELEASE
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 105759
2 pages
TXT
Total Documents: 1 document , 2 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC LITIGATION RELEASE

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
INVESTORS
ASSET
SECURITIES
MANAGEMENT
COMMISSION
TOWER
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
ACT
COURT
UNITED STATES
SCOTT ESKIND
DISTRICT
GEORGIA
RELIEF
INVESTMENT ADVISERS
ACCOUNTING
SCHEME
FUNDS
COMPLAINT
PARTNER
INDUCE
DISCLOSE
GENERAL PARTNER
PURPOSE
FALSIFYING
BOOKS
THEFTS
ESKIND SOLICITED INVESTMENTS
OFFERING DOCUMENTS





                   UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

     Litigation Release 15395 / June 25, 1997

     SEC v. J. Scott Eskind
     (Civil Action No. 1: 97-CV-1790-CAM, N.D. Ga.)

          The Securities and Exchange Commission announced today that on
June
     23, 1997, the Honorable Charles A. Moye, Jr., United States District
Judge
     for the Northern District of Georgia, entered an order of preliminary
     injunction and other relief as to defendant J. Scott Eskind ("Eskind"),
of
     Atlanta, Georgia.  The order enjoins and restrains Eskind from
violating
     Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 10(b) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, and Section
206
     of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940.  The Court ordered a freeze
of
     assets held or controlled by Eskind. The Court further ordered Eskind
to
     prepare a sworn accounting of all monies received from the scheme and
of
     the disposition and use of said funds.  The accounting is to be
submitted
     to the Court within 20 days of the date of the Court's order.

          Eskind consented to the relief without admitting or denying the
     allegations set forth in a complaint, filed by the Commission on June
20,
     1997.  In its complaint, the Commission alleged that, between November
1994
     and May 1996, Eskind was secretary and treasurer of Tower Asset
Management
     ("Tower"), the general partner and investment adviser of Asset
Management
     Fund, L.P. ("Asset Management"), a limited partnership formed for the
     purpose of investing in securities.  In or before April 1996, Eskind
     misappropriated or converted approximately $246,000 of Asset
Management's
     assets, and concealed his actions by falsifying the partnership's
SNIPPETS:
  • UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
  • SEC v. J. Scott Eskind
  • The Securities and Exchange Commission announced today that on June
  • 23, 1997, the Honorable Charles A. Moye, Jr., United States District Judge for the Northern
  • The order enjoins and restrains Eskind from violating Section 17of the Securities Act of
  • of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940.
  • The Court further ordered Eskind to prepare a sworn accounting of all monies received from
  • Eskind consented to the relief without admitting or denying the allegations set forth in a
  • Eskind was secretary and treasurer of Tower Asset Management
  • the general partner and investment adviser of Asset Management
  • Fund, L.P., a limited partnership formed for the purpose of investing in securities.
  • In or before April 1996, Eskind misappropriated or converted approximately $246,000 of Asset
  • When the thefts were discovered, Eskind was terminated by Tower.
  • Eskind solicited investments from the public using Asset Management's offering documents.
  • Eskind induced or attempted to induce at least three investors to invest in what was falsely
  • Eskind persuaded two of the investors to invest, respectively, $500,000 and $150,000 in his
  • Eskind did not disclose to the investors that he had been terminated by Tower nor did he
  •    |