LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v STUART GREGORY SMITH and CAPITAL INVESTMENT MANAGERS, et al Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: LR-15410, Defendant: Stuart Gregory Smith and Capital Investment Managers, Inc., Plaintiff: SEC, State: ND North Dakota, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>LR-15410, Securities, Water, Exchange, Complaint, Commission, Smith, Investment, Exchange Act, Alleges, Cimi, Violations, Fort Worth, Broker-dealer, Cimi Customer, Anti-fraud, Provisions, United States, Stuart, Gregory, Investment Managers, District, Texas, Permanent, Consent, Common Stock, Investors Holding, Thereunder, Judgement , ContentID: 120242650

Case Documents
1 1997-07-10 SEC LITIGATION RELEASE
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 105744
2 pages
TXT
Total Documents: 1 document , 2 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC LITIGATION RELEASE

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
WATER
EXCHANGE
COMPLAINT
COMMISSION
SMITH
INVESTMENT
EXCHANGE ACT
ALLEGES
DEFENDANTS
CIMI
VIOLATIONS
FORT WORTH
BROKER-DEALER
CIMI CUSTOMER
ANTI-FRAUD
PROVISIONS
UNITED STATES
STUART
GREGORY
INVESTMENT MANAGERS
DISTRICT
COURT
TEXAS
PERMANENT
CONSENT
COMMON STOCK
INVESTORS HOLDING
THEREUNDER
JUDGEMENT





                   UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

     LITIGATION RELEASE NO. 15410 July 10, 1997

     SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. STUART GREGORY SMITH AND
CAPITAL
     INVESTMENT MANAGERS, INC.
     497-CV 545-A, USDC, ND/TX (Fort Worth Division)

          The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") announced
that
     on July 7, 1997, it filed a complaint in United States District Court
in
     Fort Worth, Texas, seeking a permanent injunction against Stuart
Gregory
     Smith and Capital Investment Managers, Inc. ("CIMI"), a broker-dealer
     registered with the Commission.  In its complaint, the Commission
alleges
     that, from July 1992 through October 1993, defendants caused twenty
six
     separate CIMI customer accounts to purchase approximately $7.5 million
of
     privately-placed Water Point Systems, Inc. ("Water Point"), debt
securities
     and that defendants subsequently exchanged some of these securities
for
     other Water Point securities with less favorable terms.  The
Commission
     further alleges that defendants executed many of these transactions
without
     the knowledge or consent of the CIMI customers and by forging, or
causing
     to be forged, customer signatures.  Water Point, a Fort Worth, Texas
     company, marketed and distributed home and office water purification
     equipment.  Defendant Smith served as a Water Point director from
November
     1992 through March 1995 and, together with his wife, beneficially
owned
     12.5 percent of Water Point's outstanding common stock.  On March 10,
1995,
     Water Point filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition, which was later
     converted to a Chapter 7 liquidation.  Water Point investors holding
common
SNIPPETS:
  • UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
  • The Securities and Exchange Commission announced that on July 7, 1997, it filed a complaint
  • Smith and Capital Investment Managers, Inc., a broker-dealer registered with the Commission.
  • In its complaint, the Commission alleges that, from July 1992 through October 1993,
  • The Commission further alleges that defendants executed many of these transactions without
  • Water Point, a Fort Worth, Texas company, marketed and distributed home and office water
  • Water Point investors holding common stock and unsecured notes lost their entire investment,
  • 1934 ("Exchange Act") and Rules 10b-5, 15c1-2, 15c1-5 and 17a-4 thereunder.
  • The complaint further alleges that Smith violated the anti-fraud provisions and aided and
  • Although the complaint sought civil penalties against Smith, the proposed final judgment does
  •    |