LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v SOUTHWEST INCOME TRUST, INC., et al Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: LR-15421, Defendant: Southwest Income Trust, Inc., et al, Plaintiff: SEC, State: AZ Arizona, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>LR-15421, Securities, Investors, Judgement, Act, Trust, Shoop, Exchange, Commission, Marriott, Funds, Violations, Trading, Arizona, Alleges, Complaint, Enjoins, Income Trust, Civil Penalties, Sale, Treasury Securities, Trading Profits, Thereunder, Freeze, Assets, Entry, Admitting, Denying, Allegations , ContentID: 120242639

Case Documents
1 1997-07-24 SEC LITIGATION RELEASE
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 105733
4 pages
TXT
Total Documents: 1 document , 4 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC LITIGATION RELEASE

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
INVESTORS
JUDGEMENT
ACT
TRUST
SHOOP
EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
MARRIOTT
FUNDS
VIOLATIONS
TRADING
DEFENDANTS
ARIZONA
ALLEGES
COMPLAINT
ENJOINS
COURT
INCOME TRUST
CIVIL PENALTIES
SALE
TREASURY SECURITIES
TRADING PROFITS
THEREUNDER
FREEZE
ASSETS
ENTRY
ADMITTING
DENYING
ALLEGATIONS





                   UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


     Litigation Release No. 15421 / July 24, 1997

     SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION V. SOUTHWEST INCOME TRUST, ET AL.,
Civil
     Action No. 97-0953 PHX RCB

          The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") announced
that
     on July 11 and July 21, 1997, the Honorable Robert C. Broomfield,
United
     States District Judge, issued Judgments respectively against an
Arizona
     accountant, Steven Robert Shoop ("Shoop"), and a California attorney,
     Anthony Ghirardello Marriott, for their roles in a $10.7 million
scheme
     involving the fraudulent sale of investments in a Treasury securities
     trading program.

          The Commission alleges in its Complaint that the defendants,
including
     Shoop and Marriott, raised the $10.7 million from approximately 149
     investors in Arizona and California through the sale of interests in
     investment trusts ("Trusts") and other programs.  The defendants
     represented to investors that:  investor funds would only be used to
     purchase and trade Treasury securities; investors would receive 1%
per
     month in profits from trading Treasury securities; if the 1% monthly
return
     from trading profits were not achieved, investors' funds would be
returned;
     and only after payment of the 1% monthly return, would the trustees of
the
     Trusts, sales agents, and others be paid from excess trading profits.

          The Complaint further alleges that contrary to these
representations,
     the defendants operated a Ponzi-like scheme that paid investors their
1%
     monthly return from other investors' funds, failed to return
investors'
SNIPPETS:
  • UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
  • States District Judge, issued Judgments respectively against an Arizona accountant, Steven
  • The Commission alleges in its Complaint that the defendants, including Shoop and Marriott,
  • The defendants represented to investors that: investor funds would only be used to purchase
  • The Judgment against Shoop permanently enjoins him from future fraud and registration
  • Specifically, the Judgment enjoins Shoop from future violations of Sections 5, 5and 17of the
  • The Judgment additionally orders that Shoop shall pay disgorgement, prejudgment interest and,
  • Securities Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder.
  • The Judgment also continues a freeze on Marriott's assets until further order of the Court.
  • Marriott consented to the entry of the Judgment without admitting or denying the Commission's
  • Trust; Advantage Income Trust; and Investors Trading Trust; Palo Verde
  •    |