LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v STEVEN H. SCHIFFER, JOANN R. SCHULZ, GARY S. KRAMER, et al Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: LR-15435, CourtCode: DIS, CourtName: COMPLAINT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT, Defendant: Steven H. Schiffer, Joann R. Schulz, Gary S. Kramer, Jonathan Solow, Frank J. Cannata, and Peter G. Mintz, Plaintiff: SEC, State: WA Washington, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>LR-15435, Securities, Complaint, Schiffer, Securities Act, Phoenix, Exchange, Commission, Schulz, Violation, Complaint Alleges, Kramer, Stock, Cannata, Sale, Provisions, Shares, Losses, Requests, Jonathan Solow, Mintz, Commission Filings, Federal Securities Laws, Officer, Antifraud, Applications, Anticipated Revenue, Possession, Nonpublic Information , ContentID: 120242625

Case Documents
1 1997-08-07 SEC LITIGATION RELEASE
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 105719
3 pages
TXT
Total Documents: 1 document , 3 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC LITIGATION RELEASE

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
COMPLAINT
SCHIFFER
SECURITIES ACT
PHOENIX
EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
SCHULZ
VIOLATION
COMPLAINT ALLEGES
KRAMER
STOCK
CANNATA
SALE
DEFENDANTS
PROVISIONS
SHARES
LOSSES
REQUESTS
JONATHAN SOLOW
MINTZ
COURT
COMMISSION FILINGS
FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS
OFFICER
ANTIFRAUD
APPLICATIONS
ANTICIPATED REVENUE
POSSESSION
NONPUBLIC INFORMATION






                          SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                                   Washington, D.C.

     Litigation Release No. 15435 / August 7, 1997

     SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. STEVEN H. SCHIFFER, JOANN R.
SCHULZ,
     GARY S. KRAMER, JONATHAN SOLOW, FRANK J. CANNATA, and PETER G. MINTZ,
97
     Civ. 5853 (RO) (S.D.N.Y. August 7, 1997)

          Today, the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") filed
a
     Complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern District
of
     New York, alleging market manipulation, insider trading, the making
of
     false and misleading statements in Commission filings, and the sale
of
     unregistered securities, all in violation of the federal securities
laws.
     All of these activities related to Phoenix Laser Systems, Inc.
("Phoenix"),
     a now-defunct company that was in the business of developing a laser
     workstation to perform eye surgery.

          The defendants are:  Steven H. Schiffer (former chairman and
chief
     executive officer of Phoenix), Joann R. Schulz (Phoenix's former
president
     and chief operating officer), Gary S. Kramer (former investment
relations
     representative of Phoenix), Jonathan Solow (formerly Phoenix's vice
     president, secretary, and director), Frank J. Cannata (a stockbroker
and
     consultant to Phoenix), and Peter G. Mintz (a stockbroker and analyst,
who
     covered Phoenix for his firm).

          According to the Complaint, between May 1992 and August 1992,
     Schiffer, Kramer, Solow, Cannata, and Mintz, manipulated Phoenix's
common
SNIPPETS:
  • SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
  • SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. STEVEN H. SCHIFFER, JOANN R. SCHULZ,
  • GARY S. KRAMER, JONATHAN SOLOW, FRANK J. CANNATA, and PETER G. MINTZ,
  • Complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, alleging
  • All of these activities related to Phoenix Laser Systems, Inc., a now-defunct company that
  • According to the Complaint, between May 1992 and August 1992, Schiffer, Kramer, Solow,
  • Based on this activity, the Complaint alleges that these defendants violated the antifraud
  • Administration applications, the number of orders for Phoenix's product, and anticipated
  • million shares of Phoenix stock directly for approximately $4.2 million, and he sold
  • S transactions described below, for approximately $11 million, thereby avoiding losses of
  • Similarly, between December 1991 and September 1993, while in possession of such material,
  • Based on this activity, the Complaint alleges that Schiffer and Schulz violated the antifraud
  • The Complaint also requests that the Court order Schiffer, Schulz, Kramer, and Cannata to
  •    |