LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v INTERACTIVE MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES LTD., et al Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: LR-15441, Defendant: Interactive Medical Technologies Ltd., William E. Shell, and Clark M. Holcomb, Plaintiff: SEC, State: CA California, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>LR-15441, Imt, Holcomb, Shell, Securities, Registration Provisions, Complaint, Violation, Imt Stock, Exchange Commission, Broker-dealer, Interactive Medical Technology, Permanent Injunction, Offering, Shares, California, William, Clark, President, Connection, Relevant Time Period, Age, Alleges, Future Violation, Act, Civil Penalties, Admitting, Denying, Allegations Therein, Entry, Judgments , ContentID: 120242619

Case Documents
1 1997-08-13 SEC LITIGATION RELEASE
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 105713
2 pages
TXT
Total Documents: 1 document , 2 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC LITIGATION RELEASE

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
HOLCOMB
SHELL
SECURITIES
REGISTRATION PROVISIONS
COMPLAINT
VIOLATION
IMT STOCK
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
BROKER-DEALER
INTERACTIVE MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY
PERMANENT INJUNCTION
OFFERING
SHARES
CALIFORNIA
WILLIAM
CLARK
PRESIDENT
CONNECTION
RELEVANT TIME PERIOD
AGE
ALLEGES
FUTURE VIOLATION
ACT
CIVIL PENALTIES
ADMITTING
DENYING
ALLEGATIONS THEREIN
ENTRY
JUDGMENTS





                   UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

     Litigation Release No. 15441 / August 13, 1997


     SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. INTERACTIVE MEDICAL
TECHNOLOGIES
     LTD., WILLIAM E. SHELL, AND CLARK M. HOLCOMB,
     97 Civ. 6027 (S.D.N.Y. August 13, 1997)

          The Securities and Exchange Commission filed a Complaint today
     charging Interactive Medical Technology, Inc. ("IMT"), Dr. William E.
     Shell, the former president of IMT, and Clark M. Holcomb with violating
the
     registration provisions of the federal securities laws in connection
with
     their offering of approximately 2.5 million shares of IMT common stock
to
     the public during 1992 and 1993.  Holcomb was also charged with acting
as
     an unregistered broker-dealer in connection with this public offering
of
     IMT stock.

          IMT is a corporation with its principal offices in Santa Monica,
     California.  During the relevant time period, IMT was engaged in the
     development of, among other things, dietary supplements.  Shell, age
53, is
     a founder of IMT and a medical doctor with a cardiology practice in
Beverly
     Hills, California.  During the relevant time period, Shell served as
IMT's
     president, chief executive officer and chairman of the board.  Holcomb,
age
     47, is a licensed real-estate agent who resides in Westlake Village,
     California.

          The Complaint alleges that from approximately April 1992 through
at
     least June 1993, IMT, Shell and Holcomb raised approximately $5
million
     from the sale of IMT stock to approximately 300 investors.  No
registration
SNIPPETS:
  • SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. INTERACTIVE MEDICAL
  • TECHNOLOGIES LTD., WILLIAM E. SHELL, AND CLARK M. HOLCOMB,
  • The Securities and Exchange Commission filed a Complaint today charging Interactive Medical
  • Holcomb was also charged with acting as an unregistered broker-dealer in connection with this
  • IMT is a corporation with its principal offices in Santa Monica, California.
  • Shell, age 53, is a founder of IMT and a medical doctor with a cardiology practice in Beverly
  • During the relevant time period, Shell served as IMT's president, chief executive officer and
  • The Complaint alleges that from approximately April 1992 through at least June 1993, IMT,
  • No registration statement was in effect with respect to these shares of IMT stock.
  • IMT and Shell were previously enjoined from violating the registration provisions, based upon
  • in violation of the broker dealer registration provisions.
  • The Complaint seeks the following relief: permanent injunctions from future violation of
  • Simultaneous with the filing of the Complaint, and without admitting or denying the
  •    |