LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v ABDUL ISMAIL, ONG CONGQIN BOBBY, and LUM KWAN SUNG Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: LR-15442, CourtName: UNKNOWN PURCHASER AND OBTAINED A COURT ORDER FREEZING HIS TRADING, Defendant: Abdul Ismail, Ong Congqin Bobby, and Lum Kwan Sung, Plaintiff: SEC, State: WA Washington, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>LR-15442, Commission, Ismail, Securities, Trading, Ong Congqin Bobby, Lum Kwan, Purchases, Apl, Trading Proceeds, Evidence, Abdul Ismail, Civil Insider Trading, Merger, Swiss, Bank, Account, Order Freezing, Staff, Exchange Commission, Freeze, Deposition, Lacks Sufficient Evidence, Prosecuting, Prejudice, Refile, Uncover, Pending Claims, Extend , ContentID: 120242618

Case Documents
1 1997-08-15 SEC LITIGATION RELEASE
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 105712
2 pages
TXT
Total Documents: 1 document , 2 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC LITIGATION RELEASE

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
ISMAIL
SECURITIES
TRADING
DEFENDANTS
ONG CONGQIN BOBBY
LUM KWAN
PURCHASES
APL
TRADING PROCEEDS
EVIDENCE
ABDUL ISMAIL
CIVIL INSIDER TRADING
MERGER
SWISS
BANK
ACCOUNT
COURT
ORDER FREEZING
STAFF
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
FREEZE
DEPOSITION
LACKS SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE
PROSECUTING
PREJUDICE
REFILE
UNCOVER
PENDING CLAIMS
EXTEND





                          SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                                   Washington, D.C.


     Litigation Release No. 15442 / August 15, 1997

     SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. ABDUL ISMAIL, ONG CONGQIN BOBBY,
AND
     LUM KWAN SUNG, 97 Civ. 2664 (U.S.D.C., S.D.N.Y.) (JSM)

          The Securities and Commission announced today that it has
voluntarily
     dismissed its civil insider trading claim against Abdul Ismail, a
London
     businessman.  Ismail is one of three defendants in a civil insider
trading
     action involving purchases of the securities of APL Limited in advance
of
     the public announcement, on April 13, 1997, that the company would be
     acquired in a merger with Neptune Orient Lines Ltd.  Using a numbered
Swiss
     bank account, Ismail bought approximately $228,000 of APL stock options
on
     April 11, 1997, which nearly doubled in value after the merger was
     announced two days later.  The Commission filed suit against Ismail as
an
      unknown purchaser  and obtained a court order freezing his trading
     proceeds on April 15, 1997.  The Commission also sued a second, known
     defendant (Ong Congqin Bobby) in its April 15 complaint, and added a
third,
     known defendant (Lum Kwan Sung) on April 25.

          Because the Swiss bank through which Ismail traded refused to
divulge
     his identity, the Commission s staff was unable to interview him before
the
     action was filed.  Since then, the staff has conducted a thorough
     investigation of his trading, including questioning him in a
deposition.
     Based on all of the evidence gathered since the case was filed, the
     Commission has determined that it lacks sufficient evidence to
continue
     prosecuting its claim against Ismail at this time.  Under the terms of
SNIPPETS:
  • SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. ABDUL ISMAIL, ONG CONGQIN BOBBY,
  • The Securities and Commission announced today that it has voluntarily dismissed its civil
  • Ismail is one of three defendants in a civil insider trading action involving purchases of
  • The Commission filed suit against Ismail as an unknown purchaser and obtained a court order
  • The Commission also sued a second, known defendant (Ong Congqin Bobby) in its April 15
  • Because the Swiss bank through which Ismail traded refused to divulge his identity, the
  • Since then, the staff has conducted a thorough investigation of his trading, including
  • Based on all of the evidence gathered since the case was filed, the Commission has determined
  • Under the terms of the dismissal, the freeze on Ismail s trading proceeds will be lifted
  • The dismissal is without prejudice, which means that the Commission would be permitted to
  • The Commission s dismissal of its claim against Ismail does not affect its pending claims
  • Those defendants have consented to extend the freezes on their accounts through dates in
  •    |