UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Litigation Release No. 15444 / August 15, 1997
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION V. DHIREIN PATEL, U.S. District
Court
for the Eastern District of Michigan, Civil Action No. 97-CV-74151
(E.D.
Mich. August 13, 1997)
The Securities and Exchange Commission announced that on August
13,
1997, it filed a Complaint for Permanent Injunction in the United
States
District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan against Dhirein
Patel,
a resident of Troy, Michigan. The Complaint alleges that Patel,
while
employed at CUC International, Inc., a company based in Stamford,
Connecticut, engaged in trading of stock in Advance Ross Corporation
while
in possession of material, nonpublic information concerning CUC's
proposed
acquisition of Advance Ross. Advance Ross was formerly a publicly
held
company based in Chicago, Illinois and is now wholly-owned by CUC.
Patel has consented, without admitting or denying the allegations
in
the Complaint, to the entry of Final Judgment and Order of Permanent
Injunction which will enjoin him from future violations of Section
10(b) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. The
Final
Judgment will also require Patel to disgorge his profits of $10,390
plus
prejudgment interest and to pay a civil penalty of $10,390 pursuant
to
Section 21A of the Exchange Act.
In its Complaint, the Commission alleges that in late September
or
early October of 1995, Patel, who was CUC's Director of Taxes, was
SNIPPETS:
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION V. DHIREIN PATEL, U.S. District Court for the Eastern
it filed a Complaint for Permanent Injunction in the United States
District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan against Dhirein Patel, a resident of
The Complaint alleges that Patel, while employed at CUC International, Inc., a company based
Advance Ross was formerly a publicly held company based in Chicago, Illinois and is now
Patel has consented, without admitting or denying the allegations in the Complaint, to the
Judgment will also require Patel to disgorge his profits of $10,390 plus prejudgment interest
In its Complaint, the Commission alleges that in late September or early October of 1995,
Complaint further alleges that, On October 16, 1995, when CUC's proposed acquisition of
shares of Advance Ross stock.
According to the Complaint, on October
Advance Ross and CUC publicly announced CUC's intended purchase of Advance Ross' stock.
The Complaint alleges that, as a result, the stock price of Advance Ross closed up
The Complaint alleges that Patel received profits of $10,390 as a result of this price
|